🇪🇺ap european history review

English and French experiences of absolutism during the 17th century

Written by the Fiveable Content Team • Last updated September 2025
Verified for the 2026 exam
Verified for the 2026 examWritten by the Fiveable Content Team • Last updated September 2025

Definition

The English and French experiences of absolutism during the 17th century refer to the differing approaches both nations took in establishing absolute monarchy, where a ruler holds supreme authority. While France embraced a strong centralization of power under leaders like Louis XIV, England's path was marked by conflict, leading to a constitutional monarchy after the Glorious Revolution. These contrasting experiences highlight the varying outcomes of absolutist rule in Europe.

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

  1. Louis XIV's reign in France is often considered the pinnacle of absolutism, where he famously stated, 'L'état, c'est moi' (I am the state), symbolizing his total control.
  2. In contrast to France, England experienced significant conflict during this period, including the English Civil War, which challenged the idea of absolute monarchy and ultimately led to a constitutional framework.
  3. The English Bill of Rights in 1689 established limits on royal power and laid the foundation for parliamentary sovereignty, marking a shift away from absolutist rule.
  4. France's absolutism allowed for cultural flourishing, particularly through art and architecture, with the construction of the Palace of Versailles symbolizing royal power and grandeur.
  5. While both nations dealt with issues related to taxation and governance, England's path diverged as its citizens sought greater representation and rights compared to France's centralized approach.

Review Questions

  • Compare and contrast the methods used by Louis XIV in France and Charles I in England to maintain their authority during the 17th century.
    • Louis XIV maintained his authority through a combination of centralized control and cultural patronage, effectively managing the nobility by requiring their presence at Versailles, thereby limiting their power. In contrast, Charles I attempted to assert his authority by bypassing Parliament, leading to conflict that escalated into the English Civil War. While Louis XIV was successful in establishing a strong absolutist regime, Charles I's failure resulted in his execution and ultimately shifted England toward a constitutional monarchy.
  • Analyze how the outcomes of absolutism in England and France influenced the political landscape of Europe in subsequent centuries.
    • The outcomes of absolutism in England and France set contrasting precedents for governance in Europe. France's model led to further centralization under monarchs who sought absolute power, while England’s experience resulted in a constitutional framework that limited monarchical authority. This divergence contributed to differing approaches to governance throughout Europe, influencing revolutions, reform movements, and eventually shaping modern democratic ideals based on representation and rights.
  • Evaluate the long-term implications of the Glorious Revolution on English governance compared to the lasting effects of Louis XIV's reign on French society.
    • The Glorious Revolution established a constitutional monarchy in England that emphasized parliamentary supremacy and civil liberties, setting a precedent for democratic governance that would influence future political developments globally. In contrast, Louis XIV's reign solidified an absolutist state in France that fostered centralized control but also sowed seeds for future discontent among various social classes. The legacy of these experiences would culminate in contrasting revolutionary movements—England evolving towards democracy while France faced upheaval with the French Revolution fueled by dissatisfaction with absolutism.

"English and French experiences of absolutism during the 17th century" also found in: