Grounded theorization

Definition

Grounded theorization is a qualitative research method that involves developing theories based on data collected from the field rather than starting with a preconceived hypothesis. This approach emphasizes the generation of theory through systematic data collection and analysis, allowing researchers to derive insights that are deeply rooted in real-world contexts.

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

1. Grounded theorization was developed by sociologists Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in the 1960s as a response to traditional quantitative research methods.
2. The process of grounded theorization involves iterative cycles of data collection and analysis, allowing researchers to adapt their focus as new insights emerge.
3. Theories generated through grounded theorization are context-specific and can evolve over time as more data is collected and analyzed.
4. Grounded theorization emphasizes the importance of the researcher's perspective and experiences, which can influence the interpretation of data.
5. It is widely used across various disciplines, including sociology, psychology, and education, due to its flexibility and depth in understanding complex social phenomena.

Review Questions

• How does grounded theorization differ from traditional research methods in terms of theory development?
  • Grounded theorization differs from traditional research methods by focusing on generating theories directly from data collected in the field, rather than testing existing theories or hypotheses. In traditional methods, researchers often start with a hypothesis and design their study around it. In contrast, grounded theorization allows for an emergent approach where theories evolve as data is analyzed, providing a more nuanced understanding of the phenomenon being studied.
• Discuss the role of constant comparative methods in the process of grounded theorization and how it enhances theory development.
  • Constant comparative methods play a crucial role in grounded theorization by allowing researchers to compare new data with previously collected data throughout the study. This ongoing comparison helps to refine categories and concepts, leading to a deeper understanding of patterns and relationships within the data. By continuously integrating new findings into the analysis, researchers can develop a more robust and comprehensive theory that reflects the complexity of real-world situations.
• Evaluate how theoretical sampling contributes to the effectiveness of grounded theorization as a qualitative research approach.
  • Theoretical sampling enhances the effectiveness of grounded theorization by ensuring that participants are chosen based on their relevance to the developing theory. This targeted selection allows researchers to gather rich, contextualized data that directly informs and shapes their theoretical framework. As new insights arise during the study, researchers can adjust their sampling strategy to explore different aspects or dimensions of the phenomenon, ultimately leading to a more refined and credible theory that accurately represents the experiences of those involved.

Related terms

Constant comparative method: A technique used in grounded theorization where data is continuously compared throughout the research process to refine categories and develop a theory.

Theoretical sampling:

A sampling strategy used in grounded theorization where participants are selected based on their relevance to the emerging theory, rather than through random sampling.

Open coding:

The initial stage of coding in grounded theorization where data is broken down into discrete parts to identify and categorize concepts.