Writing 'we accept the null hypothesis'
Hypothesis tests never prove or accept H0. The correct language is 'we fail to reject H0' or 'there is not convincing statistical evidence that...' Writing 'we accept H0' signals a fundamental misunderstanding of inference and will cost you the conclusion component.
Listing conditions without verifying them
Writing 'random: yes, independence: yes, large counts: yes' earns no credit for condition checking. You must show the numerical verification: state that the sample was randomly selected, confirm the sample is less than 10% of the population, and calculate np and n(1-p) with actual values.
Omitting context from conclusions and interpretations
A conclusion that says 'reject H0, p < 0.05' is incomplete. A slope interpretation that says 'for each unit increase in x, y increases by 3.2' is incomplete. Every statistical statement must reference the actual variables and population from the problem to earn full credit.
Misidentifying the procedure for the scenario
Choosing a z-test for means instead of a t-test, or running a two-sample test when the data are paired, will cost you the method component and likely the conditions component too. Before writing, confirm: one or two samples? Proportion or mean? Paired or independent?
Skipping the formula or setup on calculator-based procedures
AP Statistics scorers cannot see your calculator. If you write only the output without showing the test statistic formula, substituted values, or degrees of freedom, you may lose the procedure component even when the answer is numerically correct. Show your setup.