โ„ข๏ธTrademark Law Unit 2 โ€“ Distinctiveness and Trademark Eligibility

Distinctiveness and trademark eligibility are crucial concepts in trademark law. These principles determine which marks can receive legal protection and how strong that protection will be. Understanding the spectrum of distinctiveness helps businesses choose effective trademarks. This unit covers key requirements for trademark eligibility, types of trademarks, and common challenges in selecting and protecting marks. It also provides real-world examples and practical tips for choosing strong, distinctive trademarks that can be effectively enforced.

What's This Unit All About?

  • Explores the fundamental principles of trademark distinctiveness and eligibility
  • Focuses on understanding what makes a mark eligible for trademark protection
  • Covers the spectrum of distinctiveness, from generic to fanciful marks
  • Examines the requirements a mark must meet to be considered distinctive and eligible for registration
  • Discusses common challenges and pitfalls in selecting and protecting trademarks
  • Provides real-world examples and case studies to illustrate key concepts
  • Offers practical tips for choosing strong, distinctive, and protectable trademarks

Key Concepts and Definitions

  • Trademark: A word, phrase, symbol, or design that identifies and distinguishes the source of goods or services
  • Distinctiveness: The ability of a mark to identify and distinguish the source of goods or services from those of others
  • Generic mark: A term that refers to the general class or category of goods or services (aspirin, escalator)
  • Descriptive mark: A mark that describes a quality, characteristic, function, or feature of the goods or services (Best Buy, American Airlines)
  • Suggestive mark: A mark that suggests a quality or characteristic of the goods or services but requires imagination, thought, or perception to reach a conclusion about the nature of the goods or services (Coppertone, Microsoft)
  • Arbitrary mark: A mark that has a common meaning but is used in an arbitrary or unexpected way in relation to the goods or services (Apple for computers, Camel for cigarettes)
  • Fanciful mark: A coined or invented word that has no inherent meaning or association with the goods or services (Kodak, Exxon)

Types of Trademarks

  • Word marks: Consist of words, letters, numbers, or combinations thereof (Coca-Cola, IBM)
  • Design marks: Consist of symbols, logos, or other graphical elements (Nike swoosh, Apple logo)
  • Trade dress: The overall appearance and packaging of a product, including size, shape, color, texture, and graphics (Coca-Cola bottle shape, Tiffany & Co. blue box)
  • Sound marks: Consist of a distinctive sound or series of sounds (NBC chimes, MGM lion roar)
  • Color marks: Consist of a specific color or combination of colors used in a distinctive way (Tiffany & Co. blue, UPS brown)
  • Scent marks: Consist of a distinctive scent or fragrance (Play-Doh scent, Verizon stores' fragrance)
  • Motion marks: Consist of a distinctive motion or sequence of motions (Lamborghini car door opening, 20th Century Fox searchlight logo)

Requirements for Trademark Eligibility

  • The mark must be distinctive, capable of identifying and distinguishing the source of goods or services
  • The mark must be used in commerce, or there must be a bona fide intent to use the mark in commerce
  • The mark must not be confusingly similar to any existing trademarks or trade names
  • The mark must not be deceptive, misleading, or falsely suggest a connection with persons, institutions, or national symbols
  • The mark must not be a generic term for the goods or services
  • The mark must not be a functional feature of the goods or services
    • Functional features are essential to the use or purpose of the product or affect its cost or quality

The Spectrum of Distinctiveness

  • Generic marks: Offer no trademark protection; cannot be registered or enforced
  • Descriptive marks: Require secondary meaning (acquired distinctiveness) to be eligible for protection
    • Secondary meaning is achieved when consumers associate the mark with a particular source through extensive use and promotion
  • Suggestive marks: Inherently distinctive and eligible for trademark protection without proof of secondary meaning
  • Arbitrary marks: Inherently distinctive and eligible for strong trademark protection
  • Fanciful marks: Inherently distinctive and receive the highest level of trademark protection
    • Fanciful marks are considered the strongest type of trademark because they have no inherent meaning or association with the goods or services

Common Challenges and Pitfalls

  • Choosing a mark that is too generic or descriptive, making it difficult to enforce and protect
  • Failing to conduct a thorough trademark search to identify potential conflicts with existing marks
  • Not considering the potential for trademark dilution, where a famous mark's distinctiveness is weakened by unauthorized use
  • Overlooking the importance of consistent use and proper trademark notice (ยฎ for registered marks, โ„ข for unregistered marks)
  • Not monitoring the market for potential infringement and taking prompt action to enforce trademark rights
  • Allowing a trademark to become generic through improper use or lack of enforcement (aspirin, escalator)
  • Not considering the international implications of trademark selection and protection in a global market

Real-World Examples and Case Studies

  • Apple Inc. successfully registered "Apple" as a trademark for computers, despite the term being arbitrary for the goods (Apple Inc. v. Apple Corps)
  • Walmart failed to obtain a trademark registration for its "Investing in American Jobs" slogan, as it was deemed merely informational and not distinctive (In re Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.)
  • Christian Louboutin's red sole trademark was upheld as a valid and enforceable trademark for women's high-heel shoes (Christian Louboutin S.A. v. Yves Saint Laurent America Holding, Inc.)
  • The "Booking.com" mark was found to be descriptive but had acquired secondary meaning, making it eligible for trademark protection (USPTO v. Booking.com B.V.)
  • The "Pretzel Crisps" mark was deemed to be generic for pretzel crackers, and thus not eligible for trademark protection (Frito-Lay North America, Inc. v. Princeton Vanguard, LLC)

Practical Tips for Trademark Selection

  • Choose a mark that is inherently distinctive, such as a suggestive, arbitrary, or fanciful term
  • Avoid generic or descriptive terms, as they offer limited or no trademark protection
  • Conduct a thorough trademark search to identify potential conflicts with existing marks
  • Consider the potential for trademark dilution and choose a mark that is unlikely to weaken the distinctiveness of famous marks
  • Use the mark consistently and provide proper trademark notice (ยฎ for registered marks, โ„ข for unregistered marks)
  • Monitor the market for potential infringement and take prompt action to enforce your trademark rights
  • Be mindful of the international implications of your trademark selection and protect your mark in relevant foreign markets
  • Consult with a qualified trademark attorney to develop a comprehensive trademark strategy and ensure proper protection


ยฉ 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
APยฎ and SATยฎ are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.

ยฉ 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
APยฎ and SATยฎ are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.