sampling surveys unit 6 study guides

What's Multistage Sampling?

• Multistage sampling involves selecting a sample in stages using smaller and smaller sampling units at each stage
• Consists of two or more stages of random sampling, with the sampling units at each stage being sub-sampled from the previous stage
• Begins by dividing the population into groups or clusters (primary sampling units or PSUs)
  • PSUs are selected using a probability sampling method (simple random sampling, systematic sampling, or stratified sampling)
• Elements within selected PSUs can be subsampled using simple random sampling (two-stage sampling) or further clustered into secondary sampling units (three-stage sampling)
• Combines principles of cluster sampling and stratified sampling to create a more complex sampling design
• Often used when a complete list of all members of the population does not exist or is difficult to obtain
• Allows for the selection of a sample that is representative of the population while being more cost-effective and efficient than other sampling methods

Why Use Multistage Sampling?

• Enables researchers to obtain a representative sample when a complete sampling frame of the entire population is not available or feasible to create
• Reduces the cost and time required for data collection compared to other probability sampling methods (simple random sampling)
• Allows for the stratification of the population at various stages, ensuring that important subgroups are adequately represented in the sample
• Provides a way to sample geographically dispersed populations by first selecting clusters (cities, counties) and then sampling within those clusters
• Increases the efficiency of fieldwork by concentrating data collection efforts within selected clusters or areas
• Offers flexibility in the design, allowing researchers to adapt the sampling process to the specific needs and constraints of the study
• Enables the estimation of population parameters with a known level of precision while minimizing the overall sample size required

Types of Multistage Sampling

• Two-stage sampling: Involves selecting primary sampling units (PSUs) in the first stage and then selecting elements from each PSU in the second stage
  • Example: Selecting a sample of schools (PSUs) and then selecting students within each school
• Three-stage sampling: Adds an additional stage of sampling between the selection of PSUs and the final sampling units
  • Example: Selecting counties (PSUs), then selecting households within counties, and finally selecting individuals within households
• Cluster sampling with stratification: Combines multistage sampling with stratification, where the population is first divided into strata and then clusters are selected within each stratum
• Sampling with probability proportional to size (PPS): A method where the probability of selecting a PSU is proportional to its size, ensuring that larger PSUs have a higher chance of being selected
• Area sampling: A type of multistage sampling where the PSUs are geographical areas (counties, cities, or census tracts) and subsequent stages involve selecting smaller areas or households within the selected areas
• Multiphase sampling: Involves collecting data on a large sample in the first phase and then selecting a subsample for more detailed data collection in subsequent phases

Steps in Multistage Sampling

1. Define the target population and the sampling frame
2. Determine the number of stages and the sampling units at each stage
3. Select the primary sampling units (PSUs) using a probability sampling method
   • Divide the population into non-overlapping PSUs
   • Choose the appropriate sampling method for selecting PSUs (simple random sampling, systematic sampling, or stratified sampling)
4. Within each selected PSU, select the secondary sampling units (SSUs) using a probability sampling method
   • Create a sampling frame for each selected PSU
   • Use simple random sampling or systematic sampling to select SSUs
5. If necessary, continue the process of selecting smaller sampling units within the SSUs until the final sampling units (FSUs) are reached
6. Collect data from the selected FSUs
7. Weight the data to account for the unequal probabilities of selection at each stage and to ensure that the sample is representative of the population
8. Analyze the data and draw conclusions, taking into account the complex sampling design

Pros and Cons

Pros:

• Cost-effective compared to other probability sampling methods, as it reduces travel and data collection expenses
• Efficient in terms of time and resources, as it concentrates data collection efforts within selected clusters or areas
• Allows for the representation of important subgroups through stratification at various stages
• Provides a way to sample geographically dispersed or hard-to-reach populations
• Offers flexibility in the design, allowing researchers to adapt the sampling process to specific needs and constraints

Cons:

• Increased complexity in the sampling design and data analysis compared to simple random sampling
• Potential for higher sampling error due to the clustering of units, leading to less precise estimates than simple random sampling
• Requires accurate and up-to-date information about the PSUs and SSUs to create appropriate sampling frames
• May introduce bias if the clusters or sampling units are not representative of the population
• Difficulty in estimating the design effect and adjusting for the complex sampling design in the analysis phase

Calculating Sample Size and Weights

• Sample size calculation in multistage sampling is more complex than in simple random sampling due to the clustering of units
• Factors to consider when determining the sample size:
  • Desired level of precision (margin of error)
  • Confidence level
  • Design effect (a measure of the increase in variance due to the complex sampling design)
  • Intraclass correlation (ICC) within clusters
• Use sample size formulas specific to multistage sampling that account for the design effect and ICC
  • Example formula: $n = \frac{z^2 p(1-p) deff}{d^2}$, where $n$ is the sample size, $z$ is the z-score for the desired confidence level, $p$ is the expected proportion, $deff$ is the design effect, and $d$ is the margin of error
• Weighting is necessary to account for the unequal probabilities of selection at each stage and to ensure that the sample is representative of the population
• Calculate base weights as the inverse of the product of the selection probabilities at each stage: $w_i = \frac{1}{\prod_{j=1}^{m} \pi_{ij}}$, where $w_i$ is the base weight for unit $i$, $m$ is the number of stages, and $\pi_{ij}$ is the selection probability for unit $i$ at stage $j$
• Adjust base weights for non-response and post-stratification to ensure that the weighted sample aligns with known population characteristics

Real-World Examples

1. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES):
   • Uses a four-stage sampling design to select a representative sample of the U.S. population
   • Stages: counties (PSUs), segments within counties, households within segments, and individuals within households
   • Oversamples certain subgroups (racial/ethnic minorities, older adults) to ensure adequate representation
2. Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS):
   • Conducted in over 90 developing countries to collect data on population, health, and nutrition
   • Typically employs a two-stage sampling design
   • Stages: enumeration areas (PSUs) selected with PPS, and households within selected enumeration areas
3. European Social Survey (ESS):
   • A cross-national survey conducted in over 30 European countries
   • Uses a multistage sampling design with stratification in most countries
   • Common stages: regions (PSUs), municipalities or postal code areas within regions, households within municipalities, and individuals within households
4. India National Family Health Survey (NFHS):
   • Collects data on population, health, and nutrition in India
   • Employs a two-stage sampling design in rural areas and a three-stage design in urban areas
   • Rural stages: villages (PSUs) and households within villages
   • Urban stages: wards (PSUs), census enumeration blocks within wards, and households within blocks

Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

1. Inaccurate or outdated sampling frames:
   • Ensure that the sampling frames for PSUs and subsequent stages are up-to-date and comprehensive
   • Use the most recent census data, administrative records, or satellite imagery to create accurate sampling frames
2. Inadequate representation of important subgroups:
   • Stratify the population at various stages to ensure that important subgroups are adequately represented
   • Consider oversampling rare or hard-to-reach subgroups to increase their representation in the sample
3. Ignoring the design effect in sample size calculations:
   • Account for the design effect when calculating the required sample size to ensure that the study has sufficient power
   • Use sample size formulas specific to multistage sampling that incorporate the design effect and intraclass correlation
4. Failing to adjust for unequal probabilities of selection:
   • Calculate and apply appropriate weights to account for the unequal probabilities of selection at each stage
   • Use the inverse of the product of selection probabilities at each stage as the base weight for each unit
5. Not accounting for the complex sampling design in data analysis:
   • Use statistical methods that account for the complex sampling design, such as survey data analysis techniques in statistical software packages (STATA, R, SAS)
   • Incorporate the sampling weights and adjust for the clustering and stratification in the analysis to obtain unbiased estimates and correct standard errors
6. Inadequate documentation of the sampling process:
   • Thoroughly document each stage of the sampling process, including the selection methods, sampling frames, and any modifications made during data collection
   • Provide clear descriptions of the sampling design in study reports and publications to enable accurate interpretation and replication of the results