Light
collapse
Practice Quizzes
AP US Government
Unit 2 – Branches of Government
Topic 2.3
What could have been the outcome if earmarks were never banned from congressional appropriations?
Legislators might have used them as a tool for negotiation, potentially leading to an increase in bipartisan cooperation on budget issues.
All public funds will likely get diverted into projects benefitting specific constituents at the expense of national interest.
Legislative efficiency will fall as members would spend more time on securing funds for local projects rather than national issues.
It would lead to unchecked rises in government spending without any possibility of control or oversight by other branches of government.
Related content
Practice quizzes
Practice this subject
Practice this unit
Practice this topic
Study guides (1)
AP US Government - 2.3 Congressional Behavior
Key terms
Earmarks
Banned
Congressional Appropriations
About Us
About Fiveable
Blog
Careers
Testimonials
Code of Conduct
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
CCPA Privacy Policy
Resources
Cram Mode
AP Score Calculators
Study Guides
Practice Quizzes
Glossary
Crisis Text Line
Request a Feature
Report an Issue
Stay Connected
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
About Us
About Fiveable
Blog
Careers
Testimonials
Code of Conduct
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
CCPA Privacy Policy
Resources
Cram Mode
AP Score Calculators
Study Guides
Practice Quizzes
Glossary
Crisis Text Line
Request a Feature
Report an Issue
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Back
Practice Quiz
Guides
Glossary
Guides
Glossary
Next
