Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Voice leading is the connective tissue of tonal harmonyโit's what transforms a series of isolated chords into a coherent musical statement. When you're analyzing Bach chorales, Mozart string quartets, or even pop progressions, you're being tested on your ability to recognize why certain voice movements sound polished while others sound clunky or amateurish. The principles here govern independence of voices, smooth melodic motion, and proper treatment of dissonance, all of which appear repeatedly in part-writing exercises and analytical questions.
Don't just memorize a list of "don'ts." Instead, understand the underlying acoustic and perceptual reasons behind each rule. When you know why parallel fifths weaken texture or why the leading tone demands resolution, you can apply these concepts flexiblyโwhether you're completing a figured bass, analyzing a chorale, or identifying errors in a given passage. These rules aren't arbitrary; they're the grammar of tonal music.
The fundamental goal of voice leading is maintaining distinct melodic lines that work together without collapsing into each other. When voices move in ways that obscure their individuality, the texture loses depth and the ear struggles to track separate parts.
Compare: Parallel fifths vs. hidden fifthsโboth involve perfect intervals and similar motion, but parallels are consecutive while hidden intervals approach the perfect interval from different starting points. Parallels are always wrong; hidden fifths depend on context (outer voices, leaping motion). If asked to identify the more severe error, choose parallel motion.
Certain scale degrees carry inherent melodic energy that demands specific resolution. The leading tone () and chordal sevenths create tension that must resolve for the phrase to feel complete.
Compare: General tendency tone resolution vs. specific leading tone treatmentโall leading tones are tendency tones, but the leading tone has the strongest pull and strictest resolution requirements. FRQs often test whether you know when inner-voice exceptions are acceptable.
Good voice leading minimizes unnecessary movement while maintaining interest. The principle of parsimonyโmoving each voice as little as possibleโcreates cohesion without sacrificing musical vitality.
Compare: Common tone retention vs. avoiding large leapsโboth serve smooth voice leading, but common tones address harmonic continuity while leap restrictions address melodic continuity. A well-led voice does both: holds common tones when available, moves by step otherwise.
The overall sound depends on strategic distribution of chord tones and thoughtful motion between outer voices. These rules ensure the harmony sounds full while the texture remains interesting.
Compare: Contrary motion vs. complete voicingโcontrary motion addresses how voices move, while complete voicing addresses what pitches are present. Both contribute to a rich texture, but they solve different problems. An FRQ might present a passage with good contrary motion but incomplete chords, or vice versa.
| Concept | Key Rules |
|---|---|
| Voice Independence | Avoid parallel 5ths/8ves, avoid hidden 5ths/8ves, avoid voice crossing |
| Tendency Tone Resolution | Resolve leading tone to tonic, resolve chordal 7ths down by step |
| Smooth Melodic Motion | Maintain common tones, avoid leaps larger than octave, stay in range |
| Texture and Balance | Use contrary motion in outer voices, include all chord tones |
| Doubling Priorities | Double root first, bass note in first inversion, never double leading tone |
| Acceptable Exceptions | Inner voice leading tone to fifth, brief inner voice crossing |
| Most Severe Errors | Parallel 5ths/8ves, unresolved outer voice leading tone, missing third |
| Context-Dependent | Hidden intervals (depends on voice and motion type) |
Both parallel fifths and hidden fifths involve perfect intervalsโwhat distinguishes them, and which is considered the more serious error in all contexts?
Which two rules both serve the goal of maintaining voice independence, and how do they approach this goal differently (one addressing interval relationships, one addressing register)?
If you're connecting a chord to a chord and the leading tone is in an inner voice, what are your two options for resolving it, and when is each appropriate?
Compare the treatment of common tones with the use of contrary motion: in what situation might these two principles conflict, and which typically takes priority?
You're analyzing a chorale and notice the tenor briefly dips below the bass before returning to its normal range. Is this automatically an error? What factors would you consider in your assessment?