upgrade
upgrade

💸Cost Accounting

Variance Analysis Formulas

Study smarter with Fiveable

Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.

Get Started

Why This Matters

Variance analysis is the backbone of management accounting—it's how companies figure out why actual results differ from what they planned. You're not just being tested on whether you can plug numbers into formulas; you're being tested on your ability to diagnose performance problems and trace variances to their root causes. Every formula tells a story about either a price/rate issue (we paid more or less than expected) or a quantity/efficiency issue (we used more or less than expected).

The real exam skill here is understanding which variance to calculate when, who's responsible for each variance, and how variances connect to each other. A purchasing manager controls material prices but not usage; a production supervisor controls efficiency but not wage rates. Master these relationships, and you'll crush both multiple-choice questions and FRQs that ask you to analyze performance. Don't just memorize formulas—know what each variance reveals about operations.


Price and Rate Variances

These variances isolate the impact of paying more or less per unit of input than expected. The key mechanism: hold quantity constant and focus solely on the price difference.

Direct Materials Price Variance

  • Formula: (APSP)×AQ(AP - SP) \times AQ—where AP is actual price, SP is standard price, and AQ is actual quantity purchased
  • Purchasing department responsibility—this variance reflects supplier negotiations, market price changes, or decisions to buy different quality materials
  • Favorable when AP < SP—but watch out: buying cheap materials might cause unfavorable quantity variances later due to waste

Direct Labor Rate Variance

  • Formula: (ARSR)×AH(AR - SR) \times AH—where AR is actual rate, SR is standard rate, and AH is actual hours worked
  • HR and management responsibility—reflects wage negotiations, overtime premiums, or using workers at different skill levels than planned
  • Isolates the "price" of labor—a favorable variance from using lower-paid workers might backfire if they're less efficient

Compare: Materials Price Variance vs. Labor Rate Variance—both measure what we paid versus what we expected to pay, but materials prices are often market-driven while labor rates reflect internal decisions like overtime authorization. If an FRQ asks about controllability, this distinction matters.


Quantity and Efficiency Variances

These variances measure whether inputs were used efficiently. The key mechanism: hold price constant at standard and focus on the quantity difference.

Direct Materials Quantity Variance

  • Formula: (AQSQ)×SP(AQ - SQ) \times SP—where AQ is actual quantity used, SQ is standard quantity allowed for actual output, and SP is standard price
  • Production department responsibility—reflects material waste, spoilage, or better-than-expected yields
  • "Standard quantity allowed" is key—this flexes with actual production volume, so you're comparing apples to apples

Direct Labor Efficiency Variance

  • Formula: (AHSH)×SR(AH - SH) \times SR—where AH is actual hours, SH is standard hours allowed for actual output, and SR is standard rate
  • Production supervisor responsibility—reflects worker productivity, training effectiveness, and production scheduling
  • Directly tied to operational efficiency—unfavorable variances might indicate poor supervision, equipment problems, or unrealistic standards

Compare: Materials Quantity Variance vs. Labor Efficiency Variance—both use the same structure (actual minus standard, times standard price), but they measure different resources. An FRQ might give you a scenario where cheap materials cause both a favorable price variance and an unfavorable efficiency variance due to rework.


Variable Overhead Variances

Variable overhead variances follow the same price/efficiency logic but apply to indirect costs that change with activity level. These are typically driven by the same factors as direct labor since variable overhead is often applied based on labor hours.

Variable Overhead Spending Variance

  • Formula: Actual VOH(AH×SVOR)Actual\ VOH - (AH \times SVOR)—where SVOR is the standard variable overhead rate, comparing actual spending to what you'd expect given actual hours
  • Measures rate differences in variable overhead—did you spend more or less per hour on utilities, supplies, and indirect labor than expected?
  • Multiple cost drivers complicate analysis—unlike direct materials with one price, variable overhead includes many items, making root cause analysis harder

Variable Overhead Efficiency Variance

  • Formula: (AHSH)×SVOR(AH - SH) \times SVOR—same structure as labor efficiency, just applied to variable overhead
  • Driven entirely by labor efficiency—if workers are inefficient with their time, they also "use" more variable overhead
  • Mirrors the labor efficiency variance—favorable labor efficiency always means favorable VOH efficiency when both use labor hours as the base

Compare: VOH Spending vs. VOH Efficiency—spending variance asks "did we control overhead costs per hour?" while efficiency variance asks "did we work the right number of hours?" A department could have favorable spending (good cost control) but unfavorable efficiency (too many hours worked).


Fixed Overhead Variances

Fixed overhead behaves differently because these costs don't change with production volume in the short run. The variance analysis splits into spending control and capacity utilization.

Fixed Overhead Spending Variance

  • Formula: Actual FOHBudgeted FOHActual\ FOH - Budgeted\ FOH—the simplest variance calculation, just actual minus budget
  • Measures budget adherence for fixed costs—did we spend what we planned on rent, depreciation, and salaried supervisors?
  • Often small and uncontrollable—many fixed costs are committed, so large variances usually indicate budget errors or unexpected events

Fixed Overhead Volume Variance

  • Formula: (Actual UnitsBudgeted Units)×SFOR(Actual\ Units - Budgeted\ Units) \times SFOR—or equivalently, Budgeted FOHApplied FOHBudgeted\ FOH - Applied\ FOH
  • Measures capacity utilization, not spending—this variance exists because we apply fixed overhead at a predetermined rate based on expected volume
  • Favorable when production exceeds budget—you're spreading fixed costs over more units, reducing cost per unit (but this doesn't mean you actually saved money)

Compare: FOH Spending vs. FOH Volume—spending variance measures cost control while volume variance measures capacity utilization. The volume variance is sometimes called a "plug" because it reconciles budgeted and applied overhead. Exams love asking which variance is controllable—spending variance somewhat, volume variance rarely.


Sales Variances

Sales variances shift focus from cost control to revenue analysis. These help explain why actual revenue differs from budgeted revenue.

Sales Price Variance

  • Formula: (ASPBSP)×AQ(ASP - BSP) \times AQ—where ASP is actual selling price, BSP is budgeted selling price, and AQ is actual quantity sold
  • Marketing and sales responsibility—reflects pricing decisions, discounts given, or market conditions
  • Favorable when prices exceed budget—but consider whether higher prices caused lower volume

Sales Volume Variance

  • Formula: (AQBQ)×BSP(AQ - BQ) \times BSP—where AQ is actual units sold and BQ is budgeted units sold
  • Measures demand and market performance—reflects sales team effectiveness, market conditions, and competitive factors
  • Can be further split—advanced analysis separates this into market size variance and market share variance

Compare: Sales Price vs. Sales Volume Variance—these mirror the cost variance structure but apply to revenue. A company might have favorable price variance (sold at premium prices) but unfavorable volume variance (sold fewer units)—classic price-volume tradeoff. FRQs often ask you to evaluate whether a pricing strategy was successful overall.


Quick Reference Table

ConceptBest Examples
Price/Rate VariancesMaterials Price, Labor Rate, VOH Spending
Quantity/Efficiency VariancesMaterials Quantity, Labor Efficiency, VOH Efficiency
Fixed Overhead AnalysisFOH Spending, FOH Volume
Revenue AnalysisSales Price, Sales Volume
Purchasing ResponsibilityMaterials Price Variance
Production ResponsibilityMaterials Quantity, Labor Efficiency, VOH Efficiency
Capacity UtilizationFOH Volume Variance
Controllable vs. UncontrollableSpending variances (more controllable) vs. Volume variance (less controllable)

Self-Check Questions

  1. Which two variances share the exact same efficiency measure, just applied to different cost pools? What does this tell you about their relationship?

  2. A company reports a favorable materials price variance but an unfavorable materials quantity variance. What purchasing decision might explain both results, and what's the net effect on total materials cost?

  3. Compare the fixed overhead spending variance and the fixed overhead volume variance: which one measures actual cost control, and which one is essentially an accounting reconciliation?

  4. If an FRQ gives you actual hours worked, standard hours allowed, and the standard variable overhead rate, which variance can you calculate? Write the formula and explain what it reveals about operations.

  5. A sales manager argues that a $50,000 unfavorable sales volume variance was offset by a $60,000 favorable sales price variance, so overall performance was good. What's the flaw in this reasoning, and what additional information would you need to fully evaluate performance?