Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Value chain analysis is one of the most practical frameworks you'll encounter in competitive strategy—it's how you move from abstract ideas about "competitive advantage" to concrete, actionable insights about where a firm actually wins or loses. When exam questions ask you to evaluate a company's strategic position or recommend improvements, value chain analysis gives you the systematic approach to dissect operations, identify cost drivers, and pinpoint differentiation opportunities. You're being tested on your ability to connect internal activities to external competitive outcomes.
The real power here isn't just listing activities—it's understanding linkages, cost drivers, and value creation mechanisms that determine whether a firm achieves cost leadership or differentiation. Don't just memorize the nine steps; know which steps address internal diagnosis, which focus on external benchmarking, and which drive strategic action. That conceptual distinction is what separates strong exam answers from surface-level responses.
Before comparing yourself to competitors, you need a clear picture of how your firm creates value. These foundational steps establish the analytical baseline.
Compare: Value contribution analysis vs. cost driver analysis—both examine individual activities, but one asks "what does this add?" while the other asks "what does this cost?" Strong FRQ answers connect both: an activity might add significant value and have controllable cost drivers, making it a priority for investment.
Individual activities don't operate in isolation. Competitive advantage often emerges from how activities connect rather than from any single activity alone.
Internal analysis only tells half the story. These steps position your value chain within the competitive landscape.
Compare: Industry value chain analysis vs. competitor benchmarking—industry analysis gives you the structure of competition, while competitor comparison gives you relative position. An FRQ might ask you to do both: first map where value is created industry-wide, then assess where a specific firm stands.
With diagnosis complete, these steps translate analysis into strategic direction.
Compare: Differentiation vs. cost leadership identification—both emerge from value chain analysis, but they look at different signals. Differentiation focuses on value contribution uniqueness; cost leadership focuses on cost driver advantages. Know which activities typically support each strategy.
Analysis without action is academic. This final step converts insights into operational improvements.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Internal diagnosis | Identify activities, analyze value contribution, identify cost drivers |
| Linkage analysis | Evaluate linkages between activities |
| External benchmarking | Analyze industry value chain, compare to competitors |
| Strategic positioning | Assess competitive advantage, identify differentiation/cost leadership potential |
| Implementation | Develop optimization strategies |
| Primary activities | Inbound logistics, operations, outbound logistics, marketing/sales, service |
| Support activities | Firm infrastructure, HR, technology development, procurement |
| Cost driver types | Scale, capacity utilization, learning, linkages, policy choices |
Which two steps focus specifically on external analysis rather than internal diagnosis, and why must they be performed after mapping your own value chain?
Compare and contrast how you would use value chain analysis to pursue differentiation versus cost leadership—which steps would you emphasize differently?
A firm discovers that its operations activity has high costs but also creates significant customer value. Using value chain analysis logic, what should the firm investigate next?
If an FRQ asks you to "assess a company's competitive position using value chain analysis," which steps provide the internal baseline and which provide the competitive context?
Why does evaluating linkages between activities often reveal competitive advantages that analyzing individual activities cannot? Provide an example of how a linkage might create value.