Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Unemployment isn't just one thing—it's a collection of distinct phenomena, each with different causes and different policy solutions. On the AP Macro exam, you're being tested on your ability to distinguish why someone is unemployed, not just that they're unemployed. The exam loves to ask which type of unemployment changes during a recession (cyclical), which types persist even at full employment (frictional and structural), and how the natural rate of unemployment connects to long-run equilibrium.
Understanding these distinctions also unlocks bigger concepts: the business cycle, the Phillips curve trade-off, and why policymakers can't simply "fix" all unemployment with demand-side policies. Some unemployment is actually healthy for a dynamic economy, while other types signal serious problems. Don't just memorize definitions—know what economic principle each type illustrates and how it connects to aggregate supply, aggregate demand, and long-run equilibrium.
These types persist even when the economy is operating at potential GDP. Together, they form the natural rate of unemployment—the baseline level that exists due to normal labor market dynamics, not economic weakness.
Compare: Frictional vs. Structural—both exist at full employment, but frictional is short-term and voluntary while structural is long-term and involuntary. If an FRQ asks about policies to reduce unemployment at full employment, focus on supply-side solutions for structural unemployment.
This category directly connects to the business cycle. When aggregate demand falls, this type of unemployment rises—and it's the primary target of stabilization policy.
Compare: Cyclical vs. Natural unemployment—cyclical unemployment is the deviation from the natural rate. When actual unemployment exceeds the natural rate, the economy has a recessionary gap. This distinction is crucial for Phillips curve questions.
These types result from wages being set above equilibrium—either by policy, institutions, or market power. They represent involuntary unemployment where workers want jobs at prevailing wages but can't find them.
Compare: Classical vs. Keynesian unemployment—both are involuntary, but classical blames wage rigidity (supply-side) while Keynesian blames insufficient demand (demand-side). The policy prescription differs: classical suggests wage flexibility, Keynesian suggests fiscal stimulus.
These types emerge when the structure of the economy shifts, displacing workers from declining sectors or technologies.
Compare: Technological vs. Seasonal unemployment—both involve predictable job losses, but technological unemployment represents permanent structural change requiring adaptation, while seasonal unemployment is temporary and recurring with the same jobs returning each cycle.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Natural rate of unemployment | Frictional, Structural |
| Responds to demand-side policy | Cyclical, Keynesian |
| Caused by wage rigidity | Classical, Involuntary |
| Supply-side solutions needed | Structural, Technological |
| Exists at full employment | Frictional, Structural, Natural |
| Tied to business cycle | Cyclical |
| Not in labor force | Voluntary |
| Predictable patterns | Seasonal |
If the economy is at full employment (actual unemployment equals the natural rate), which types of unemployment still exist, and why can't policy eliminate them?
Compare and contrast cyclical and structural unemployment: How do their causes differ, and why does this matter for choosing between demand-side and supply-side policies?
A country experiences a recession and unemployment rises from 5% to 8%. If the natural rate is 5%, what is the cyclical unemployment rate, and what does this imply about the output gap?
An FRQ describes workers losing jobs because a new minimum wage law was implemented. Which type of unemployment does this represent, and how would you illustrate it graphically?
Why is the natural rate of unemployment associated with the vertical LRAS curve, and what happens to this relationship when cyclical unemployment exists?