Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Trade barriers are at the heart of international economics—they explain why countries don't simply trade freely despite the theoretical benefits of comparative advantage. When you encounter questions about protectionism, trade policy, or economic integration, you're really being tested on your understanding of how governments intervene in markets and what happens when they do. These barriers affect prices, quantities, government revenue, consumer welfare, and producer surplus—all concepts that show up repeatedly in FRQs.
The key insight is that trade barriers work through different mechanisms: some raise prices directly (tariffs), some restrict quantities (quotas), and some create invisible friction (regulatory barriers). Each mechanism produces distinct winners and losers, and the AP exam loves asking you to trace these effects through supply and demand analysis. Don't just memorize the list—know why each barrier exists, who benefits, and what economic distortions it creates.
These barriers work by directly increasing the cost of foreign goods, making domestic alternatives relatively cheaper without limiting quantity.
Compare: Tariffs vs. Subsidies—both make domestic goods more competitive, but tariffs raise consumer prices while subsidies use taxpayer money. If an FRQ asks about government revenue effects, tariffs generate it; subsidies spend it.
These barriers directly limit how much of a good can cross borders, creating artificial scarcity regardless of price.
Compare: Quotas vs. VERs—both limit quantity, but quota rents stay home with quotas while VERs hand profits to foreign producers. This makes VERs economically irrational unless you factor in political pressure.
These "invisible" barriers don't explicitly tax or limit trade but create friction that raises costs and discourages imports.
Compare: TBTs vs. SPS Measures—both are regulatory barriers, but TBTs cover manufactured goods (safety standards, labeling) while SPS measures target food and agriculture (disease, contamination). Know which applies to which product category.
These barriers manipulate the medium of exchange itself, affecting trade competitiveness through monetary channels.
Compare: Exchange Rate Controls vs. Tariffs—both can make imports more expensive, but tariffs are transparent and WTO-regulated while exchange controls are harder to challenge internationally and create broader economic distortions.
This catch-all term encompasses everything except tariffs—important because these barriers have grown as tariffs have fallen under trade agreements.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Price-raising mechanisms | Tariffs, Subsidies |
| Quantity restrictions | Quotas, VERs, Embargoes |
| Government revenue generators | Tariffs only (not quotas or VERs) |
| Regulatory/invisible barriers | Licensing, TBTs, SPS Measures |
| Political tools | Embargoes, Exchange Rate Controls |
| Creates quota rents for foreigners | VERs |
| Creates quota rents domestically | Quotas (with licenses) |
| Hardest to identify/challenge | NTBs, TBTs, SPS Measures |
Which two trade barriers restrict quantity rather than raising prices, and how do they differ in where the economic rents end up?
A country wants to protect its steel industry while also generating government revenue. Which barrier should it choose, and why would a quota fail to meet both objectives?
Compare tariffs and subsidies: How does each affect consumer prices, and which one costs the government money rather than generating it?
An FRQ describes a country requiring extensive product testing that only domestic labs can perform. What type of barrier is this, and how would you argue it's protectionist rather than a legitimate safety measure?
Why might a country prefer to negotiate a VER with a trading partner rather than impose a quota, even though VERs are economically worse for the importing country?