Types of Surveillance Systems

Why This Matters

Surveillance systems are the backbone of epidemiology—they're how we detect outbreaks, track disease patterns, and know whether interventions are actually working. When you're tested on surveillance, you're really being tested on your understanding of data collection strategies, trade-offs between sensitivity and resources, and how different systems complement each other to create a complete picture of population health.

Don't just memorize the names of these systems. Know why you'd choose one over another, what trade-offs each involves, and how they work together. An FRQ might ask you to design a surveillance strategy for a specific scenario—and that means understanding the underlying logic, not just definitions.

---

Systems by Data Collection Approach

The most fundamental distinction in surveillance is who initiates the data collection—health authorities actively seeking cases, or providers passively reporting them. This choice affects everything from accuracy to cost.

Active Surveillance

• Health officials proactively seek out cases—through direct outreach to providers, regular phone calls, or site visits to collect data
• Higher sensitivity and completeness than passive methods, catching cases that might otherwise go unreported
• Resource-intensive but essential for outbreak investigations, eradication programs, and diseases with low incidence where every case matters

Passive Surveillance

• Healthcare providers report cases voluntarily—without prompts or follow-up from health authorities
• Cost-effective and sustainable for routine monitoring, making it the backbone of most national disease reporting systems
• Prone to underreporting since busy providers may miss or delay reports, meaning it captures only a fraction of true cases

---

Systems by Data Source

Different surveillance systems tap into different types of information—from confirmed lab results to symptom patterns to environmental samples. The data source determines what questions the system can answer.

Laboratory-Based Surveillance

• Collects data directly from diagnostic lab tests—providing pathogen-specific, confirmed information rather than clinical suspicion
• Essential for tracking antimicrobial resistance and identifying specific strains during outbreaks through molecular typing
• Gold standard for accuracy but depends on specimens being collected and tested in the first place

Syndromic Surveillance

• Monitors symptom patterns rather than confirmed diagnoses—using data from emergency departments, pharmacy sales, school absenteeism, or 911 calls
• Enables early outbreak detection by identifying unusual clusters of symptoms before lab confirmation is available
• Trades specificity for speed—may generate false alarms but provides critical early warning for bioterrorism or novel pathogens

Environmental Surveillance

• Monitors environmental reservoirs—including wastewater, air quality, water sources, and vector populations
• Detects pathogens before human cases appear—as seen with wastewater monitoring for polio and SARS-CoV-2
• Links environmental exposures to health outcomes—critical for understanding climate-related disease patterns and contamination events

---

Systems by Population Coverage

Surveillance can target everyone in a population, selected sentinel sites, or individual cases. The scope determines whether you're measuring burden, detecting trends, or investigating transmission.

Population-Based Surveillance

• Monitors all health events in a defined population—providing true incidence rates and disease burden estimates
• Requires clear denominators (knowing exactly who's in your surveillance population) to calculate meaningful rates
• Informs resource allocation by revealing which communities carry the highest disease burden and identifying health disparities

Sentinel Surveillance

• Uses selected reporting sites (hospitals, clinics, or labs) chosen to represent broader trends without monitoring everyone
• Cost-effective for trend detection—fewer sites mean less data management while still capturing meaningful patterns
• Provides early warning signals for seasonal diseases like influenza, where sentinel networks track when activity is rising

Case-Based Surveillance

• Investigates individual cases in detail—collecting demographic, clinical, exposure, and contact information for each patient
• Essential for contact tracing and understanding transmission chains during outbreaks of high-consequence diseases
• Labor-intensive but high-yield—provides the granular data needed to identify risk factors and target interventions

---

Systems by Information Structure

Some surveillance systems rely on structured, routine reporting while others scan unstructured information from diverse sources. This distinction matters for detecting novel threats.

Integrated Disease Surveillance

• Combines multiple surveillance systems into a unified framework—sharing data across diseases, sectors, and geographic levels
• Reduces duplication and improves efficiency—one reporting system can capture multiple conditions simultaneously
• Strengthens health system capacity by creating standardized processes that work for routine monitoring and emergency response

Event-Based Surveillance

• Scans unstructured data sources—including news reports, social media, ProMED alerts, and informal health worker reports
• Captures signals missed by traditional systems—particularly useful for detecting events in areas with weak routine surveillance
• Enables rapid global monitoring—systems like GPHIN and HealthMap identified early COVID-19 signals before official reports

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. Which two surveillance systems both prioritize early detection but use fundamentally different data sources to achieve it?

2. A health department wants to calculate the true incidence rate of diabetes in their county. Which surveillance approach would provide the denominator data they need, and why wouldn't sentinel surveillance work?

3. Compare and contrast active and passive surveillance: Under what circumstances would you recommend switching from passive to active surveillance for a disease that's normally monitored passively?

4. An FRQ describes a situation where emergency department visits for respiratory illness are spiking, but no lab-confirmed cases have been reported yet. Which surveillance system detected this signal, and what are its limitations?

5. Why might a country with limited resources choose to implement integrated disease surveillance rather than maintaining separate systems for each reportable condition?