Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Social work interventions aren't just a list to memorize—they represent the core toolkit you'll use throughout your career and the foundation of how the profession conceptualizes change. You're being tested on your ability to match the right intervention to the right situation, understanding levels of practice (micro, mezzo, macro), theoretical orientations, and evidence-based approaches. Exams will ask you to distinguish between interventions that look similar on the surface but operate from fundamentally different assumptions about how change happens.
Think of interventions as answers to different questions: Some ask "How do we help this individual think differently?" while others ask "How do we change the systems affecting entire communities?" The person-in-environment perspective runs through all of them, but each intervention targets a different point in that relationship. Don't just memorize what each intervention is—know what problem it solves, what level it operates on, and when you'd choose it over alternatives.
These interventions work at the micro level, focusing on individual psychological processes. They assume that changing internal patterns—thoughts, beliefs, behaviors—leads to improved functioning and well-being.
Compare: CBT vs. Solution-Focused Brief Therapy—both are structured and time-limited, but CBT analyzes problematic thought patterns while SFBT deliberately avoids problem exploration. If an exam asks about a client who needs quick results and has clear goals, SFBT is your answer; if the client has persistent negative thinking patterns, choose CBT.
These interventions recognize that people exist within relationships and systems. Change happens not just inside the individual but in the interactions between people.
Compare: Individual Counseling vs. Family Therapy—both are direct practice, but individual counseling locates the problem within the person while family therapy locates it in relational patterns. Exam tip: if a question describes family conflict or a child's behavior problems, family therapy addresses the system rather than just the "identified patient."
These interventions address acute distress and the lasting effects of traumatic experiences. They prioritize safety and stabilization before deeper therapeutic work.
Compare: Crisis Intervention vs. Trauma-Informed Care—crisis intervention is a specific, time-limited response to an acute event, while trauma-informed care is an ongoing organizational approach that shapes all interactions. Both prioritize safety, but crisis intervention is reactive while trauma-informed care is preventive and pervasive.
These interventions focus on building readiness for change rather than implementing change directly. They recognize that client motivation is not a prerequisite for treatment but something developed within the helping relationship.
Compare: Motivational Interviewing vs. Psychoeducation—both aim to increase engagement, but MI works with the client's internal motivation while psychoeducation provides external information. Use MI when a client is ambivalent; use psychoeducation when a client lacks understanding of their condition or options.
These interventions emphasize clear objectives, measurable outcomes, and efficient use of time. They reflect the realities of agency-based practice where accountability and documentation matter.
Compare: Task-Centered Practice vs. Case Management—both are structured and goal-oriented, but task-centered practice focuses on the client completing specific behavioral tasks while case management focuses on the worker coordinating external resources. Task-centered is therapeutic; case management is primarily logistical (though both require strong relationships).
These interventions operate at the mezzo and macro levels, targeting communities, organizations, and policies rather than individuals. They address the structural causes of problems rather than just their individual manifestations.
Compare: Community Organizing vs. Advocacy—both seek systemic change, but community organizing builds the capacity of affected populations to advocate for themselves, while advocacy often involves the social worker speaking on behalf of clients. Organizing is empowerment-focused; advocacy can be more paternalistic if not done carefully.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Micro-level clinical work | Individual Counseling, CBT, Behavioral Modification |
| Relational/systems focus | Family Therapy, Group Therapy |
| Crisis and trauma | Crisis Intervention, Trauma-Informed Care |
| Building motivation/engagement | Motivational Interviewing, Psychoeducation, Strengths-Based Approach |
| Structured goal-oriented practice | Task-Centered Practice, Case Management, Solution-Focused Brief Therapy |
| Macro-level change | Community Organizing, Advocacy |
| Evidence-based approaches | CBT, Motivational Interviewing, Task-Centered Practice |
| Empowerment-oriented | Strengths-Based Approach, Community Organizing, Trauma-Informed Care |
A client presents with depression and persistent negative self-talk. Which two interventions both address cognitive patterns, and how do they differ in their approach to problem exploration?
You're working with a family where the adolescent has been identified as "the problem." Which intervention would help you reframe this as a systemic issue, and what key concepts would guide your assessment?
Compare case management and task-centered practice: In what type of client situation would you choose one over the other?
A client says they "know they should quit drinking but aren't sure they're ready." Which intervention is specifically designed for this presentation, and what are its core techniques?
How do community organizing and advocacy both address social justice, and what distinguishes who holds power in each approach?