Types of Social Movements

Why This Matters

Social movements are the engine of social change, and understanding them is central to sociology's core questions: How does collective action emerge? What makes some movements succeed while others fail? How do individuals become agents of structural transformation? When you encounter questions about social movements on exams, you're being tested on your ability to analyze collective behavior, social stratification, power dynamics, and cultural change—not just your ability to name movement types.

The key insight here is that movements differ along two dimensions: scope of change (how much of society they want to transform) and target of change (whether they focus on individuals or social structures). Don't just memorize these categories—know what each type reveals about the relationship between individual agency and social structure, and be ready to classify real-world examples using these analytical frameworks.

---

Movements by Scope of Change

Social movements vary dramatically in how much transformation they seek. Some work within existing systems to tweak policies, while others aim to tear down and rebuild entire social orders. This spectrum from limited to radical change is one of the most testable distinctions in the sociology of social movements.

Reform Movements

• Work within existing systems to change specific policies or practices—they accept the basic structure of society but push for targeted improvements
• Civil rights, environmental protection, and healthcare reform exemplify this type; the goal is adjustment, not revolution
• Utilize institutional channels like lobbying, voting campaigns, and legal advocacy to achieve incremental change

Revolutionary Movements

• Seek total transformation of existing social, political, or economic systems—nothing short of complete restructuring will do
• Arise from perceived systemic injustice where reform seems inadequate or impossible; think the French Revolution or anti-colonial independence movements
• Challenge the legitimacy of current power structures rather than working within them, often requiring mass mobilization and confrontation

Reactionary Movements

• Aim to reverse social change and restore a previous state of society or traditional values that participants believe have been lost
• Emerge in response to rapid modernization or progressive reforms perceived as threatening cultural identity or moral order
• Resist rather than propose—their vision is backward-looking, seeking to reclaim an idealized past rather than create something new

---

Movements by Target of Change

The other crucial dimension is who or what the movement aims to transform. Some movements focus on changing social structures and institutions; others focus on transforming individuals themselves. This distinction shapes everything from recruitment strategies to measures of success.

Alternative Movements

• Target limited change in individuals—encourage people to adopt new lifestyles or behaviors without demanding broader structural transformation
• Wellness, minimalism, and voluntary simplicity movements exemplify this type; participants change themselves rather than society
• Emphasize personal choice and gradual adoption of new values, making them less confrontational but also less politically ambitious

Redemptive Movements

• Seek radical transformation of individuals—complete personal renewal, often spiritual or moral in nature
• Religious conversion movements and twelve-step programs fit here; the goal is total individual transformation, not social reform
• Focus on inner change as the primary mechanism, believing that transformed individuals will naturally create a better society

---

Movements by Historical Period and Structure

Sociologists distinguish between movement types based on when they emerged and how they organize. These categories help explain shifts in movement tactics, goals, and constituencies over time.

Old Social Movements

• Dominated the 19th and early 20th centuries, focusing on material concerns like labor rights, suffrage, and economic redistribution
• Featured formal hierarchical organization with established leadership, clear membership, and bureaucratic structures
• Class-based mobilization was central; movements organized workers, women, or racial groups around shared structural positions

New Social Movements

• Emerged post-1960s, shifting focus to identity, lifestyle, quality of life, and post-material concerns like environmentalism and LGBTQ+ rights
• Emphasize grassroots organizing and participatory democracy rather than top-down leadership; networks replace hierarchies
• Identity and culture become central to mobilization—who you are matters as much as your economic position

---

Movements by Orientation and Scope

Some movements operate purely in opposition, while others cross national boundaries to address global concerns. These categories highlight how movements position themselves relative to existing power and geographic scale.

Resistance Movements

• Defined by opposition to specific policies, institutions, or practices perceived as unjust—they know what they're against more than what they're for
• Employ confrontational tactics including protests, boycotts, civil disobedience, and direct action to disrupt business as usual
• Can emerge rapidly in response to government actions or corporate practices, often lacking the formal organization of other movement types

Transnational Social Movements

• Operate across national borders, addressing issues like climate change, human rights, and global economic inequality that no single nation can solve
• Build international networks through NGOs, social media, and cross-border coalitions to share resources and coordinate action
• Illustrate globalization's impact on collective action—problems are global, so movements must be too

---

Movements Centered on Belief Systems

Religious and spiritual motivations have driven collective action throughout history, creating a distinct category that can overlap with other movement types.

Religious Movements

• Mobilize around shared spiritual beliefs and practices, aiming to promote moral, ethical, or theological change in society
• Can function as reform, revolutionary, or redemptive movements depending on their goals—the Religious Right seeks policy reform while millenarian movements may seek total transformation
• Provide powerful solidarity resources through existing congregations, shared rituals, and moral frameworks that motivate sacrifice for the cause

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. Using Aberle's two dimensions (scope of change and target of change), how would you classify a movement encouraging people to reduce their carbon footprint through personal lifestyle changes versus a movement demanding government regulation of fossil fuel companies?

2. What distinguishes a reactionary movement from a revolutionary movement, given that both seek dramatic social change? Provide an example of each.

3. Compare and contrast old social movements and new social movements in terms of their organizational structure, primary concerns, and basis for mobilization.

4. A religious organization launches a campaign to convert individuals to their faith while also lobbying for laws based on their moral values. Which movement types does this represent, and how do they overlap?

5. If an FRQ asked you to explain why the same social issue (like environmental degradation) might generate both alternative movements and reform movements simultaneously, what key distinction would you emphasize in your response?