Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Sentence types aren't just grammar labels—they're the building blocks of effective communication and rhetorical analysis. When you analyze an author's craft on an exam, you need to explain why a writer chose short, punchy imperatives instead of flowing complex sentences, or how a series of rhetorical questions builds tension. Understanding sentence types by function (what they do) and by structure (how they're built) gives you the vocabulary to discuss style, tone, and purpose with precision.
You're being tested on two distinct classification systems: functional types (declarative, interrogative, imperative, exclamatory) and structural types (simple, compound, complex, compound-complex). Don't just memorize definitions—know how each type creates specific effects in writing. A skilled writer manipulates both function and structure to control pacing, emphasize ideas, and engage readers. That's what examiners want you to recognize and explain.
Every sentence performs a job for the reader. Functional classification sorts sentences by their purpose—whether they inform, question, command, or exclaim. Recognizing function helps you analyze how writers guide reader responses.
Compare: Declarative vs. Exclamatory—both can convey the same basic information, but exclamatory sentences add emotional intensity through structure and punctuation. If an essay prompt asks about tone or author's attitude, look for exclamatory sentences as evidence of heightened emotion.
Structural classification examines the architecture of sentences—how many clauses they contain and how those clauses connect. Independent clauses express complete thoughts; dependent clauses cannot stand alone. Mastering structure helps you vary your own writing and analyze syntactic choices.
Compare: Simple vs. Compound vs. Complex—simple sentences emphasize single ideas with force, compound sentences balance equal ideas, and complex sentences subordinate one idea to another. When analyzing an author's style, note which structure dominates and what effect it creates.
Understanding correct sentence structure means recognizing when it breaks down. These errors appear frequently on grammar assessments and in revision-focused prompts.
Compare: Run-ons vs. Fragments—run-ons have too much (multiple independent clauses improperly joined), while fragments have too little (no complete independent clause). Both errors involve clause boundaries, but the fixes are opposite: run-ons need separation, fragments need completion.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Functional types (by purpose) | Declarative, Interrogative, Imperative, Exclamatory |
| Structural types (by clauses) | Simple, Compound, Complex, Compound-Complex |
| Sentences requiring specific end punctuation | Interrogative (question mark), Exclamatory (exclamation mark) |
| Sentences with implied subjects | Imperative (you understood) |
| Sentences showing idea equality | Compound (FANBOYS conjunctions) |
| Sentences showing idea hierarchy | Complex (subordinating conjunctions) |
| Common structural errors | Run-on sentences, Sentence fragments |
| Conjunctions for compound sentences | FANBOYS: for, and, nor, but, or, yet, so |
What's the difference between classifying sentences by function versus by structure? Give one example of each classification system.
Which two sentence types can end with an exclamation mark, and how do their purposes differ?
Compare compound and complex sentences: both contain multiple clauses, so what distinguishes them structurally and in terms of idea relationships?
A student writes: Because I studied all night. Is this a fragment or a run-on? Explain what's missing and how to fix it.
If you wanted to analyze an author's use of short, punchy sentences for dramatic effect, which structural type would you likely be discussing, and what effect does this structure typically create?