Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Understanding marketing research methods isn't just about memorizing a list of techniques—you're being tested on your ability to match the right method to the right research question. The AP exam frequently asks you to evaluate scenarios and recommend appropriate research approaches, which means you need to understand when and why each method works best, not just what it is.
These methods fall into distinct categories based on the type of data they produce (quantitative vs. qualitative), how data is collected (primary vs. secondary), and what research questions they answer (exploratory, descriptive, or causal). Don't just memorize definitions—know what each method reveals about consumer behavior and when a marketer would choose one approach over another.
These methods produce numerical data that can be statistically analyzed, allowing marketers to identify patterns, test hypotheses, and make predictions with measurable confidence levels.
Compare: Surveys vs. Experimental Research—both produce quantitative data, but surveys describe what is while experiments test what causes what. If an FRQ asks about proving a marketing tactic's effectiveness, experimental research is your answer.
These methods explore motivations, perceptions, and experiences in depth, generating rich insights that numbers alone can't capture. They sacrifice statistical generalizability for explanatory power.
Compare: Focus Groups vs. Interviews—both are qualitative, but focus groups reveal social dynamics and shared language while interviews uncover individual depth. Choose interviews for sensitive topics; choose focus groups for exploring how ideas spread.
Rather than asking consumers what they do or think, observational methods record actual behavior, eliminating the gap between stated preferences and revealed preferences.
Compare: Observational Research vs. Social Media Listening—both capture behavior without direct questioning, but observational research shows physical interactions while social listening reveals digital conversations and sentiment. Use observational for in-store behavior; use social listening for brand perception tracking.
Not all research requires collecting new data. These methods leverage existing information to provide context, identify trends, or learn from others' experiences.
Compare: Secondary Data Analysis vs. Case Studies—both use existing information, but secondary analysis identifies broad patterns while case studies examine specific examples in depth. Secondary data tells you the industry average; case studies show you how one company beat it.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Quantitative data collection | Surveys, Experimental Research, Conjoint Analysis |
| Qualitative data collection | Focus Groups, Interviews, Ethnographic Research |
| Establishing causation | Experimental Research (A/B testing) |
| Understanding motivations | Interviews, Focus Groups, Ethnographic Research |
| Observing actual behavior | Observational Research, Social Media Listening |
| Cost-effective research | Secondary Data Analysis, Surveys |
| Real-time insights | Social Media Listening |
| Product development decisions | Conjoint Analysis, Focus Groups |
A company wants to prove that their new packaging design increases purchase intent. Which research method would provide the strongest evidence, and why can't a survey accomplish the same goal?
Compare and contrast focus groups and ethnographic research. In what situation would ethnographic research reveal insights that a focus group would miss?
Which two methods both capture consumer behavior without direct questioning? What different types of insights does each provide?
A startup with limited budget needs to understand market size and competitor positioning before launching. Which method should they start with, and what are its limitations?
If an FRQ presents a scenario where a company knows what consumers are choosing but not why, which category of research methods should they employ? Name two specific methods and explain what each would reveal.