Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Listening might seem passive, but it's actually one of the most complex communication skills you'll be tested on. In Introduction to Communication Behavior, you're expected to understand that listening is not a single skill—it's a collection of distinct cognitive processes, each serving different communication goals. The types of listening you choose (or default to) directly shape the quality of your relationships, your ability to learn, and your effectiveness in professional settings.
When exam questions ask about listening, they're testing whether you understand why different situations call for different listening approaches, how each type functions cognitively and emotionally, and what outcomes each produces. Don't just memorize the names—know what mental process each type involves and when you'd strategically deploy it.
These types distinguish how much cognitive effort and interaction the listener invests. The key variable here is the listener's level of participation in the communication exchange.
Compare: Active Listening vs. Reflective Listening—both require engagement, but active listening is a broad approach while reflective listening is a specific technique within it. If an exam asks for a concrete listening strategy, reflective listening gives you a demonstrable behavior to describe.
These types are defined by the listener's goal. What you're trying to get out of the message determines which cognitive processes you activate.
Compare: Critical Listening vs. Evaluative Listening—both involve judgment, but critical listening focuses on the argument's quality while evaluative listening emphasizes the speaker's intentions and message validity. Exam tip: critical listening analyzes logic; evaluative listening assesses trustworthiness.
These types involve how listeners filter, interpret, and detect meaning. The emphasis is on what the listener notices and how they process subtle cues.
Compare: Discriminative Listening vs. Selective Listening—discriminative listening tries to catch all nuances in how something is said, while selective listening deliberately (or unconsciously) filters out parts of the message. One expands attention; the other narrows it.
This type prioritizes the emotional and relational dimensions of communication. The goal is connection rather than information.
Compare: Empathetic Listening vs. Reflective Listening—both make speakers feel heard, but empathetic listening targets emotional understanding while reflective listening confirms content accuracy. Use empathetic listening when someone needs support; use reflective listening when clarity matters most.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| High engagement | Active listening, Reflective listening |
| Low engagement | Passive listening, Selective listening |
| Information goals | Comprehensive listening, Critical listening |
| Judgment/decision goals | Critical listening, Evaluative listening |
| Emotional/relational goals | Empathetic listening |
| Aesthetic goals | Appreciative listening |
| Perceptual processing | Discriminative listening, Selective listening |
| Feedback techniques | Reflective listening, Active listening |
Which two listening types both involve judgment, and how do their focal points differ?
A student zones out during a lecture but can still repeat the last sentence the professor said. Which listening type does this represent, and why is it problematic for learning?
Compare and contrast empathetic listening and comprehensive listening. In what situations would each be most appropriate?
If you needed to detect whether a speaker was being sarcastic, which listening type would you rely on, and what specific cues would you attend to?
FRQ-style prompt: A manager must decide whether to approve a proposal based on an employee's verbal pitch. Identify two listening types the manager should employ and explain how each contributes to an informed decision.