Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Linear transformations are the heart of abstract linear algebra—they're the structure-preserving maps that let us understand how vector spaces relate to one another. When you're tested on this material, you're not just being asked to recall matrix forms. You're being evaluated on whether you understand what properties each transformation preserves, how transformations compose, and why certain transformations are invertible while others aren't. These concepts connect directly to eigentheory, dimension theorems, and the classification of operators you'll encounter throughout the course.
The key insight is that linear transformations fall into natural families based on what geometric or algebraic properties they preserve: some keep lengths intact, others maintain orientation, and some collapse dimensions entirely. Don't just memorize the matrix representations—know what each transformation does to the kernel and image, whether it's invertible, and how it behaves under composition. That conceptual understanding is what separates a 5 from a 3 on transformation questions.
These transformations keep vectors the same "size"—they preserve norms and, consequently, inner products. Geometrically, they're the rigid motions that don't stretch or compress space.
Compare: Rotation vs. Reflection—both are orthogonal transformations preserving distance, but rotations have (orientation-preserving) while reflections have (orientation-reversing). If an FRQ asks about classifying orthogonal transformations, determinant sign is your key tool.
These transformations alter the size of vectors while keeping certain structural properties intact. They're characterized by diagonal or scalar matrix representations.
Compare: Scaling vs. Dilation—scaling allows different factors along different axes (anisotropic), while dilation uses the same factor everywhere (isotropic). Dilation matrices are scalar multiples of identity; general scaling matrices are merely diagonal.
These transformations have nontrivial kernels—they send some nonzero vectors to zero, which means they're not invertible and reduce the effective dimension of the image.
Compare: Zero transformation vs. Projection—both are non-invertible with nontrivial kernels, but the zero transformation has maximal kernel (all of ) while projections have kernel equal to a proper subspace. Projections are idempotent; the zero transformation is also idempotent (since ), but trivially so.
These transformations modify geometric relationships like angles or parallelism while preserving other properties. They reveal how linear maps can distort without collapsing.
Compare: Shear vs. Rotation—both have determinant 1 and are thus area-preserving, but rotations preserve angles while shears distort them. Rotations are orthogonal and diagonalizable (over ); shears are neither.
These transformations serve as the "building blocks" and identity elements in the algebra of linear maps.
Compare: Identity vs. Zero under composition—identity is the multiplicative identity (), while zero is absorbing (). Neither has a proper inverse in the transformation algebra, but for different reasons: identity is its own inverse; zero has no inverse.
Compare: Translation vs. All Others—translation is the only transformation on this list that isn't linear. Recognizing this distinction is a common exam trap; if a problem asks "which of these is not a linear transformation," translation is your answer.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Isometries (distance-preserving) | Rotation, Reflection, Identity |
| Orthogonal transformations | Rotation (), Reflection () |
| Invertible transformations | Identity, Rotation, Reflection, Scaling (nonzero factors), Dilation () |
| Non-invertible (nontrivial kernel) | Zero, Projection, Shear (when singular) |
| Idempotent transformations | Projection, Identity, Zero |
| Determinant = 1 | Rotation, Shear |
| Not linear | Translation |
Which two transformations are both orthogonal but differ in their effect on orientation? What algebraic property distinguishes them?
A transformation satisfies . Name two transformations with this property and explain how their kernels differ.
Compare and contrast scaling and dilation: under what condition is a scaling transformation also a dilation? What property do dilations have that general scalings lack?
If you compose a rotation by with a rotation by , what transformation results? What if you compose two reflections across different lines?
An FRQ asks you to identify a transformation that preserves area but is not diagonalizable. Which transformation fits, and why does it fail to be diagonalizable?