Types of Intelligence

Why This Matters

Intelligence is one of the most debated concepts in psychology, and the AP exam will test you on more than just definitions—you're being tested on how psychologists conceptualize and measure cognitive abilities. The core tension you need to understand is whether intelligence is one general ability or many distinct abilities, and how different theorists have answered that question. This debate shapes everything from how IQ tests are constructed to how schools identify gifted students.

Each theory of intelligence reflects a different assumption about the human mind, and the exam loves to ask you to compare these approaches. You'll need to distinguish between Spearman's single-factor model, Gardner's multiple intelligences, and Sternberg's triarchic theory—and explain what evidence supports or challenges each. Don't just memorize names and definitions; know what problem each theory was trying to solve and how it changed our understanding of human potential.

---

The "One Intelligence" Approach: General Cognitive Ability

Some psychologists argue that intelligence is best understood as a single, underlying mental capacity that influences performance across all cognitive tasks. This view is supported by the positive correlations observed between different types of mental tests.

General Intelligence (g factor)

• Charles Spearman proposed the g factor in the early 1900s after noticing that people who scored well on one cognitive test tended to score well on others
• Positive correlations across tasks suggest a common underlying ability—Spearman used factor analysis to identify this shared variance
• Foundation for modern IQ testing—most standardized intelligence tests (like the WAIS and Stanford-Binet) are designed to measure g

Fluid Intelligence

• Ability to reason and solve novel problems independent of prior knowledge—think of it as your raw processing power
• Peaks in early adulthood and declines with age—this is why processing speed and working memory tasks become harder as we get older
• Tested through pattern recognition and abstract reasoning tasks like Raven's Progressive Matrices, where prior learning doesn't help

Crystallized Intelligence

• Accumulated knowledge and skills gained through education and experience—vocabulary, facts, and learned procedures
• Remains stable or increases with age—older adults often outperform younger adults on tests of verbal knowledge and expertise
• Explains the "wisdom" advantage—while fluid intelligence declines, crystallized intelligence compensates in familiar domains

---

The "Many Intelligences" Approach: Distinct Abilities

Other psychologists reject the idea of a single g factor, arguing instead that humans possess multiple, relatively independent cognitive abilities. These theories emerged partly as critiques of traditional IQ testing's narrow focus.

Multiple Intelligences Theory

• Howard Gardner proposed eight distinct intelligences—linguistic, logical-mathematical, musical, spatial, bodily-kinesthetic, interpersonal, intrapersonal, and naturalistic
• Challenges the g factor assumption—Gardner argued that traditional IQ tests only measure linguistic and logical-mathematical abilities while ignoring other valuable capacities
• Influential in education but controversial in psychology—critics note that some "intelligences" may be better described as talents or skills, and empirical support is limited

Triarchic Theory of Intelligence

• Robert Sternberg identified three components—analytical (academic problem-solving), creative (generating novel ideas), and practical (adapting to real-world demands)
• Analytical intelligence is what traditional IQ tests measure—logical reasoning, critical thinking, and evaluating information
• Practical intelligence (sometimes called "street smarts") predicts real-world success in ways that IQ scores alone cannot capture

---

Specific Cognitive Abilities

Whether you believe in g or multiple intelligences, psychologists agree that certain cognitive skills can be measured and studied independently. These abilities often appear as subscales on comprehensive intelligence tests.

Verbal Intelligence

• Language-based reasoning and comprehension—includes vocabulary, reading comprehension, and verbal analogies
• Heavily weighted on traditional IQ tests—the WAIS includes multiple verbal subtests measuring this ability
• Strongly correlated with academic achievement—verbal skills predict success in most educational settings

Spatial Intelligence

• Mental visualization and manipulation of objects—understanding maps, rotating shapes mentally, and recognizing patterns
• Important for STEM fields—architects, engineers, surgeons, and artists rely heavily on spatial reasoning
• Relatively independent from verbal ability—some individuals show large discrepancies between verbal and spatial scores

Mathematical Intelligence

• Numerical reasoning and quantitative problem-solving—includes calculation, logical sequencing, and pattern detection
• Part of Gardner's logical-mathematical intelligence—but also measured as a distinct subscale on tests like the WAIS
• Overlaps with fluid intelligence—novel math problems require abstract reasoning, not just memorized procedures

---

Intelligence Beyond IQ: Social and Emotional Abilities

Some researchers argue that traditional intelligence theories miss crucial human capacities—particularly those involving emotions and social interaction. These abilities may predict life outcomes that IQ cannot.

Emotional Intelligence

• Recognizing, understanding, and managing emotions—both your own feelings and those of others
• Four components typically identified—perceiving emotions, using emotions to facilitate thought, understanding emotions, and regulating emotions
• Predicts relationship quality and leadership effectiveness—though debate continues about whether this is truly "intelligence" or a personality trait

Practical Intelligence

• Solving real-world, everyday problems—adapting to environments, knowing how to get things done, and applying knowledge contextually
• Central to Sternberg's triarchic theory—represents the ability to "fit in" to or reshape your environment
• Not strongly correlated with IQ—someone with average test scores might excel at navigating complex social or professional situations

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. How would Spearman explain the finding that a student who excels at verbal reasoning also tends to perform well on spatial tasks? How might Gardner interpret the same finding differently?

2. A 70-year-old professor knows far more vocabulary than a 25-year-old graduate student, but the younger student solves novel logic puzzles faster. Which types of intelligence does each person demonstrate, and why does this pattern occur?

3. Compare Sternberg's triarchic theory with Gardner's multiple intelligences theory. What do they share in common, and what is the key difference in how they structure cognitive abilities?

4. If an FRQ asks you to evaluate the claim that "IQ tests measure everything important about intelligence," which theories and types of intelligence would you use to challenge this claim?

5. Why might emotional intelligence predict job performance in a manager role better than traditional IQ scores? Which theorist's framework best explains this finding?