Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Energy storage is the linchpin of the modern energy transition—without it, renewable sources like solar and wind remain unreliable because they generate power when nature allows, not when consumers need it. You're being tested on understanding how different storage technologies solve the fundamental problem of temporal mismatch between energy supply and demand, and why certain technologies excel at specific applications while failing at others.
The key concepts here include energy density vs. power density, round-trip efficiency, discharge duration, and scalability. Each storage system represents a different engineering trade-off: some store massive amounts of energy but respond slowly; others discharge instantly but can't sustain output for long. Don't just memorize the technologies—know what physical principle each one exploits and which grid applications it serves best.
These systems store energy through physical movement or position changes, exploiting fundamental physics principles like gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy. They're typically large-scale, long-lasting, and ideal for grid-level applications.
Compare: Pumped Hydro vs. Gravity Storage—both exploit gravitational potential energy, but pumped hydro requires specific topography and water resources while gravity systems can be deployed almost anywhere. If an FRQ asks about storage options for flat terrain or water-scarce regions, gravity storage is your answer.
Batteries store energy through reversible chemical reactions, offering portability and modularity that mechanical systems can't match. The trade-offs involve energy density, cycle life, cost, and safety considerations.
Compare: Lithium-ion vs. Flow Batteries—lithium-ion excels where space and weight matter (vehicles, portable devices), while flow batteries dominate stationary applications requiring long-duration discharge and frequent cycling. Know which application calls for which technology.
Unlike batteries, capacitors store energy in electric fields rather than chemical bonds, enabling fundamentally different performance characteristics—extremely fast response but limited duration.
Compare: Supercapacitors vs. Lithium-ion Batteries—supercapacitors deliver power quickly but briefly; lithium-ion stores more energy but responds more slowly. Hybrid systems combine both: supercapacitors handle power spikes while batteries provide sustained output.
Thermal systems store energy as temperature differences, exploiting sensible heat (temperature change) or latent heat (phase change). They're particularly effective for integrating with solar thermal generation and shifting cooling loads.
Chemical storage converts electricity into storable fuels, offering the longest duration storage and the ability to transport energy across distances—at the cost of conversion efficiency losses.
Compare: Hydrogen vs. Lithium-ion—batteries win for daily cycling and short-term storage (higher efficiency, lower cost), but hydrogen excels for seasonal storage and transportation applications where its portability and energy density matter more than round-trip efficiency.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Large-scale grid storage | Pumped Hydro, Compressed Air, Flow Batteries |
| Fast frequency response | Flywheels, Supercapacitors |
| High energy density (portable) | Lithium-ion Batteries |
| Long discharge duration (4+ hours) | Flow Batteries, Thermal Storage, Hydrogen |
| Seasonal/long-term storage | Hydrogen, Compressed Air |
| Mature/low-cost technology | Lead-acid Batteries, Pumped Hydro |
| Unlimited cycle life | Flywheels, Supercapacitors |
| Geographic flexibility | Gravity Storage, Batteries, Hydrogen |
Which two storage technologies exploit gravitational potential energy, and what geographic constraint limits one but not the other?
Compare the trade-offs between lithium-ion batteries and flow batteries for a utility-scale installation requiring 8 hours of daily discharge. Which would you recommend and why?
A grid operator needs sub-second response to frequency fluctuations. Which two technologies would best serve this application, and what characteristic do they share?
Why does hydrogen storage have lower round-trip efficiency than battery storage, yet still play a critical role in renewable energy systems? What applications justify the efficiency loss?
If an FRQ asks you to design a storage solution for a remote island with no suitable topography for pumped hydro and limited space, which technologies would you consider and what trade-offs would you evaluate?