Types of Ecological Relationships

Why This Matters

Ecological relationships are the invisible threads holding ecosystems together—and the AP Biology exam loves testing whether you understand why species interact the way they do. These relationships connect directly to major course themes: energy flow through ecosystems, natural selection and coevolution, population dynamics, and community structure. When you see an FRQ about population regulation or ecosystem stability, ecological relationships are almost always part of the answer.

Here's the key insight: every ecological relationship exists on a spectrum of benefit and harm. You're being tested on your ability to categorize interactions based on their effects on each species involved (positive, negative, or neutral) and to explain the evolutionary pressures these interactions create. Don't just memorize definitions—know what selective pressures each relationship type generates and how it shapes community dynamics over time.

---

Relationships Where Both Species Are Affected

These interactions involve costs or benefits for both participants, creating strong selective pressures that drive coevolution. When two species consistently affect each other's fitness, natural selection favors adaptations in both populations.

Predation

• One species (predator) kills and consumes another (prey)—this +/- interaction is the primary mechanism for energy transfer between trophic levels
• Drives coevolutionary "arms races" where prey evolve defenses (camouflage, toxins, speed) and predators evolve counter-adaptations
• Regulates prey population size and prevents any single species from dominating, maintaining community diversity

Competition

• Both species experience reduced fitness (-/- interaction) when competing for limited resources like food, space, or mates
• Intraspecific competition (within species) vs. interspecific competition (between species)—both drive natural selection but affect population dynamics differently
• Competitive exclusion principle states two species cannot occupy the same niche indefinitely; one will outcompete the other or they'll undergo niche partitioning

---

Symbiotic Relationships: Living in Close Association

Symbiosis refers to any close, long-term interaction between species—it's the umbrella term, not a specific relationship type. The three main symbiotic categories are distinguished by whether each partner benefits, is harmed, or remains unaffected.

Mutualism

• Both species benefit (+/+)—classic examples include pollinators and flowering plants, mycorrhizal fungi and plant roots, and gut bacteria in humans
• Obligate mutualism means neither species can survive alone (lichens), while facultative mutualism provides benefits but isn't required for survival
• Coevolution is strongest here because both species gain fitness advantages from maintaining the relationship

Parasitism

• Parasite benefits at host's expense (+/-)—similar to predation, but parasites typically don't immediately kill their hosts
• Ectoparasites live outside the host (ticks, lice) while endoparasites live inside (tapeworms, Plasmodium)
• Influences host population dynamics and can regulate populations as effectively as predation; also drives evolution of host immune responses

Commensalism

• One species benefits, the other is unaffected (+/0)—examples include barnacles on whales, epiphytic orchids on trees, and cattle egrets following grazing animals
• Often involves hitchhiking, shelter, or access to food without direct cost to the host species
• Hardest relationship to confirm because subtle negative or positive effects on the "unaffected" species may exist but be difficult to measure

---

Relationships With Unequal or One-Sided Effects

Some interactions affect only one species while the other remains neutral. These relationships often shape community structure through indirect effects rather than tight coevolutionary bonds.

Amensalism

• One species is harmed, the other unaffected (-/0)—often caused by physical interference or chemical inhibition
• Allelopathy is a key example: plants like black walnut trees release toxins that inhibit growth of nearby plants without gaining direct benefit
• Large organisms shading or trampling smaller ones demonstrates how body size differences create asymmetric effects on fitness

---

The Symbiosis Framework

Understanding that symbiosis is a category containing multiple relationship types is frequently tested. The exam expects you to classify specific examples and explain the evolutionary implications.

Symbiosis (Framework Overview)

• Umbrella term for close, prolonged interspecific interactions—includes mutualism, parasitism, and commensalism as subcategories
• Coevolution is common because sustained close contact creates strong reciprocal selective pressures over generations
• Distinguishing factor is intimacy of association, not whether the relationship is beneficial—parasitism is symbiotic even though one partner is harmed

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. Both predation and parasitism are +/- relationships. What key difference determines whether an interaction is classified as predation versus parasitism?

2. Which two relationship types would most directly lead to niche partitioning in a community, and why?

3. Compare and contrast obligate mutualism and facultative mutualism—how would the extinction of one partner affect the other species differently in each case?

4. A student observes birds following a tractor and eating insects disturbed from the soil. The tractor is unaffected. What type of ecological relationship is this, and how would you distinguish it from mutualism?

5. An FRQ asks you to explain how ecological relationships maintain ecosystem stability. Which three relationship types would provide the strongest examples of population regulation, and what mechanism does each use?