Types of Curriculum Models

Why This Matters

Understanding curriculum models isn't just about memorizing definitions—it's about grasping the philosophical assumptions that drive educational design. Every curriculum reflects deeper beliefs about what knowledge is worth teaching, how students learn best, and what the purpose of education should be. These models connect directly to the major philosophical traditions you're studying: essentialism, progressivism, perennialism, reconstructionism, and existentialism all manifest in how curricula are structured and delivered.

When you encounter exam questions about curriculum, you're being tested on your ability to identify the underlying philosophy each model represents and explain why certain approaches align with specific educational goals. Don't just memorize the ten models—know what each one assumes about the learner, the teacher, and the nature of knowledge itself. That conceptual understanding is what separates surface-level recall from genuine philosophical analysis.

---

Knowledge-Transmission Models

These models prioritize what students learn over how they learn it. The underlying assumption is that certain knowledge is objectively valuable and should be systematically transmitted from teacher to student.

Subject-Centered Curriculum

• Rooted in essentialist and perennialist philosophy—assumes certain disciplines contain essential knowledge all students must master
• Teacher acts as knowledge authority—instruction flows from expert to novice through structured lessons and textbooks
• Assessment emphasizes content mastery—standardized tests measure whether students have acquired the predetermined knowledge base

Core Curriculum

• Establishes non-negotiable learning requirements—mathematics, science, language arts, and social studies form the common foundation
• Reflects democratic ideals of equal access—all students receive the same essential knowledge regardless of background
• Connects to perennialism's "great ideas" tradition—certain subjects are considered universally valuable across time and context

---

Student-Centered Models

These models shift authority from content to learner, assuming that education should respond to individual needs, interests, and developmental readiness. This reflects progressive philosophy's emphasis on the child as an active meaning-maker.

Learner-Centered Curriculum

• Grounded in Dewey's progressive philosophy—education should emerge from student experiences and genuine interests
• Prioritizes process over product—collaboration, critical thinking, and problem-solving matter more than content coverage
• Accommodates diverse learning styles—instruction adapts to individual paces and preferences rather than forcing uniformity

Humanistic Curriculum

• Emphasizes whole-person development—emotional, social, and ethical growth are as important as intellectual achievement
• Reflects existentialist philosophy—students explore personal values and construct individual meaning
• Creates autonomy-supportive environments—self-directed learning and personal reflection replace teacher-dominated instruction

Experiential Curriculum

• Learning happens through direct engagement—hands-on activities, projects, and field experiences replace passive reception
• Reflection transforms experience into knowledge—students analyze what they did and connect it to broader concepts
• Bridges theory and practice—abstract ideas gain meaning through real-world application (praxis in action)

---

Problem-Oriented Models

These models organize learning around authentic challenges rather than predetermined content or individual interests. The assumption is that knowledge gains meaning through application to real issues.

Problem-Centered Curriculum

• Rooted in reconstructionist philosophy—education should address social problems and prepare students for civic engagement
• Promotes inquiry-based learning—students investigate, hypothesize, and test solutions rather than absorb answers
• Inherently interdisciplinary—real problems don't respect subject boundaries, requiring integrated knowledge application

Integrated Curriculum

• Dissolves artificial disciplinary boundaries—learning experiences combine subjects into cohesive, thematic units
• Reflects holistic epistemology—knowledge is interconnected, not compartmentalized into isolated domains
• Requires teacher collaboration—educators across disciplines plan together, modeling the integration students practice

---

Structure-and-Sequence Models

These models focus on how learning unfolds over time, assuming that effective education requires intentional organization of when and how concepts are introduced.

Spiral Curriculum

• Associated with Jerome Bruner's cognitive theory—any subject can be taught at any age if structured appropriately
• Concepts return with increasing complexity—students revisit key ideas, building deeper understanding each time
• Prevents fragmented learning—connections across grade levels create coherent intellectual development

Competency-Based Curriculum

• Mastery replaces seat time—students advance when they demonstrate proficiency, not when the semester ends
• Reflects behaviorist and pragmatist influences—observable skills and practical applications define success
• Assessment is criterion-referenced—students are measured against competency standards, not compared to peers

---

Implicit Curriculum

Not all curriculum is written in lesson plans. This model acknowledges that schools teach values, norms, and behaviors through their very structure and culture.

Hidden Curriculum

• Transmits unspoken social lessons—students learn punctuality, obedience, competition, and conformity through school routines
• Can reinforce or challenge social inequities—classroom dynamics and teacher expectations often reflect broader power structures
• Operates beneath conscious awareness—neither teachers nor students may recognize what's being taught implicitly

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. Which two curriculum models most directly reflect progressive educational philosophy, and what distinguishes their approach to student-centered learning?

2. A school requires all students to take four years of English, three years of math, and two years of science. Which curriculum model does this represent, and what philosophical tradition supports it?

3. Compare and contrast spiral curriculum and competency-based curriculum: What assumption about learning do they share, and how do their approaches to student progression differ?

4. If an FRQ asks you to analyze how schools transmit values beyond their official content, which curriculum model provides the best framework for your response? What philosophical critique does this model enable?

5. A teacher designs a unit where students investigate local water quality, integrating chemistry, civics, and writing skills. Which two curriculum models does this approach reflect, and what philosophical assumptions connect them?