Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Contraception sits at the intersection of several major themes you'll encounter throughout your human sexuality course: reproductive anatomy and physiology, sexual health decision-making, bodily autonomy, and the social determinants of health. Understanding how different methods work requires you to connect biological mechanisms—ovulation suppression, sperm barriers, implantation prevention—to real-world factors like access, cost, user compliance, and relationship dynamics. Exams will test whether you can explain not just what a method does, but why certain methods work better for certain people.
Here's the key insight: contraceptive methods aren't just a list to memorize. They represent different approaches to the same biological goal—preventing fertilization or implantation. You're being tested on your ability to categorize methods by mechanism, compare effectiveness rates, distinguish between user-dependent and provider-dependent options, and identify which methods offer STI protection (spoiler: only one category does). Don't just memorize names—know what principle each method illustrates and how it fits into the broader landscape of reproductive health choices.
Hormonal contraceptives work by introducing synthetic versions of estrogen and/or progestin into the body. These hormones prevent the release of eggs from the ovaries, thicken cervical mucus to block sperm, and thin the uterine lining to discourage implantation.
Compare: Pills vs. Patches vs. Rings—all use the same hormonal mechanism (estrogen + progestin suppressing ovulation), but differ in delivery method and compliance demands. If an exam asks about user-dependent factors in contraceptive effectiveness, these three illustrate how the same drug can have different real-world success rates based on how it's administered.
LARCs represent the most effective reversible contraceptive options because they remove user error from the equation. Once inserted by a healthcare provider, these methods work continuously without any action required from the user.
Compare: Hormonal IUD vs. Implant—both are progestin-only LARCs with similar effectiveness rates, but they differ in location (uterine vs. subcutaneous), duration (3-7 years vs. 3 years), and side effect profiles. The implant is easier to insert but more likely to cause irregular bleeding; the IUD often reduces menstrual flow over time.
Compare: Injection vs. Implant—both are progestin-only and provider-administered, but the injection requires quarterly visits while the implant works for 3 years. The injection's delayed fertility return makes it less ideal for those planning pregnancy in the near future, while the implant offers immediate reversibility.
Barrier methods work by physically blocking sperm from reaching the egg. Unlike hormonal methods, these don't alter the body's reproductive physiology—they simply create an obstacle at the time of intercourse.
Compare: Condoms vs. Diaphragm—both are barrier methods used at the time of intercourse, but condoms are the only option providing STI protection. Condoms are also more accessible (no fitting required, available over-the-counter) while diaphragms require healthcare provider involvement and spermicide.
Sterilization procedures are designed to be permanent, though reversal is sometimes possible. These surgical interventions physically prevent sperm and egg from meeting by blocking the reproductive tract.
Compare: Tubal Ligation vs. Vasectomy—both achieve permanent contraception through surgical blockage, but vasectomy is simpler, cheaper, has fewer complications, and is performed under local anesthesia. Despite this, tubal ligation is performed far more frequently, illustrating how social factors influence contraceptive choices beyond medical considerations.
Emergency contraception is used after unprotected intercourse or contraceptive failure. These methods work primarily by delaying or preventing ovulation—they do not terminate an established pregnancy.
Compare: Plan B vs. Copper IUD for Emergency Contraception—both can prevent pregnancy after unprotected sex, but the copper IUD is far more effective (99%+ vs. ~89% for Plan B) and provides ongoing contraception for up to 10 years. The IUD requires a provider visit, while Plan B is available over-the-counter.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Hormonal ovulation suppression | Pills, Patch, Ring, Implant, Injection, Hormonal IUD |
| Long-acting reversible (LARCs) | IUDs (both types), Implant |
| User-dependent effectiveness | Pills, Condoms, Diaphragm |
| STI protection | Male condoms, Female condoms |
| Progestin-only options | Implant, Injection, Hormonal IUD, Mini-pill |
| Non-hormonal options | Copper IUD, Condoms, Diaphragm, Sterilization |
| Permanent methods | Tubal ligation, Vasectomy |
| Emergency options | Plan B, Ella, Copper IUD |
Which two contraceptive methods are classified as LARCs, and what characteristic makes them more effective than user-dependent methods like pills or condoms?
Compare and contrast the copper IUD and hormonal IUD—how do their mechanisms differ, and what might make a person choose one over the other?
If a patient wants highly effective contraception but is concerned about hormonal side effects, which methods would you recommend and why?
Why is the failure rate for condoms so different between "perfect use" and "typical use," and what does this reveal about user-dependent contraceptive methods generally?
An FRQ asks you to discuss how social factors influence contraceptive choices beyond medical effectiveness. Using vasectomy vs. tubal ligation as your example, what points would you make about gender, access, and decision-making in reproductive health?