upgrade
upgrade

🔤English 9

Types of Characterization

Study smarter with Fiveable

Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.

Get Started

Why This Matters

Characterization is the engine that drives every story you'll read this year. When you understand how authors build characters, you unlock deeper analysis skills for everything from short stories to novels to the texts on your exams. You're not just being tested on whether you can identify a protagonist—you're being tested on whether you can explain how an author reveals that character's personality, motivations, and growth through specific techniques.

Think of characterization as a toolkit authors use to show you who someone really is. Some tools are obvious (the narrator tells you directly), while others require you to play detective (inferring from actions, dialogue, or what others say). Mastering these methods helps you write stronger literary analysis essays and ace questions about author's craft. Don't just memorize the terms—know what each technique accomplishes and be ready to spot examples in any text.


The Two Main Approaches: Direct vs. Indirect

Authors reveal characters in two fundamental ways: telling you outright or showing you through evidence. Understanding this distinction is the foundation for analyzing any character in literature.

Direct Characterization

  • The author explicitly states traits—no guesswork required, as the narrator simply tells you "She was stubborn" or "He had a generous heart"
  • Creates clarity and efficiency, often used to establish characters quickly at the beginning of a story or for minor characters who don't need complexity
  • Watch for narrator reliability—direct characterization only works if you trust the voice delivering it, which becomes a key analysis point in unreliable narrator texts

Indirect Characterization

  • Requires inference from evidence—you piece together personality through what characters do, say, think, and how others react to them
  • Creates depth and complexity, making characters feel more realistic because real people don't come with labels attached
  • Dominates most literary fiction—this is what exam questions target when they ask you to "analyze how the author develops" a character

Compare: Direct vs. Indirect Characterization—both reveal character traits, but direct tells while indirect shows. If an essay prompt asks about author's craft or character development, focus on indirect methods since they demonstrate more sophisticated technique.


The S.T.E.A.L. Methods of Indirect Characterization

Most indirect characterization falls into five categories you can remember with the acronym STEAL: Speech, Thoughts, Effects on others, Actions, and Looks. These are your go-to tools for any character analysis.

Dialogue (Speech)

  • Reveals personality through word choice and tone—formal vocabulary suggests education or status; slang suggests casualness or youth
  • Exposes relationships and power dynamics, since how characters speak to each other shows respect, contempt, intimacy, or distance
  • Pay attention to what's not said—hesitation, interruptions, and silences can reveal as much as the words themselves

Thoughts and Feelings

  • Grants access to internal monologue—this is the only way readers learn what characters won't say aloud or show through behavior
  • Reveals motivation and internal conflict, helping you understand why a character acts a certain way even when their actions seem contradictory
  • Creates reader empathy, since sharing someone's private thoughts builds connection even with morally complex characters

Compare: Dialogue vs. Thoughts—both reveal what a character is thinking, but dialogue shows their public self while thoughts show their private self. The gap between these is often where the most interesting character analysis lives.

Actions and Behavior

  • "Actions speak louder than words" applies directly here—what a character does under pressure reveals their true values and priorities
  • Patterns matter more than single moments, so track consistent behaviors that establish identity versus surprising choices that signal change
  • Choices in conflict are key—exam questions often focus on pivotal decisions because they reveal character most dramatically

Reactions of Other Characters (Effects)

  • Shows reputation and social impact—how others treat a character tells you about that character's role in their world
  • Provides outside perspective that can confirm or contradict what we learn through other methods, adding complexity
  • Useful for analyzing antagonists, since we often learn about villains primarily through how protagonists and minor characters respond to them

Compare: Actions vs. Reactions—actions show what a character does, while reactions show what a character causes. Both reveal character, but from opposite angles. Strong analysis considers both.


Building the Whole Picture: Supporting Methods

These techniques work alongside STEAL to create fully realized characters. They often appear in combination with other methods rather than standing alone.

Physical Description (Looks)

  • Appearance suggests personality—a character's clothing, posture, and grooming choices reflect their values, status, and self-image
  • Beware stereotypes—skilled authors subvert expectations (the well-dressed villain, the scruffy hero), so note when appearance contrasts with behavior
  • Body language communicates emotion—clenched fists, avoiding eye contact, or nervous habits reveal what characters try to hide

Background and Personal History

  • Past explains present—a character's upbringing, trauma, or formative experiences provide context for current motivations
  • Often delivered through flashback or exposition, so recognize these structural choices as deliberate characterization moves
  • Connects to theme—background often ties individual characters to broader ideas about society, family, or identity that the text explores

Compare: Physical Description vs. Background—both provide context for who a character is, but physical description shows the external self while background reveals how they became that self. Use both in essays about character development.


Quick Reference Table

ConceptBest Examples
Direct CharacterizationNarrator statements, character introductions, explicit trait labels
Speech/DialogueWord choice, tone, dialect, what's left unsaid
Thoughts/FeelingsInternal monologue, emotional reactions, private motivations
Actions/BehaviorChoices under pressure, consistent patterns, pivotal decisions
Effects on OthersOther characters' reactions, reputation, social dynamics
Physical DescriptionAppearance, clothing, body language, grooming
Background/HistoryFlashbacks, exposition, formative experiences
STEAL AcronymSpeech, Thoughts, Effects, Actions, Looks

Self-Check Questions

  1. What is the key difference between direct and indirect characterization, and why do exam questions tend to focus more on indirect methods?

  2. Which two STEAL methods both reveal a character's thinking, and how do they differ in what they show about the character's public versus private self?

  3. If a character says "I'm fine" but the narrator describes them clenching their fists and avoiding eye contact, which characterization methods are being used, and what do they reveal?

  4. Compare and contrast how physical description and background/history both provide context for a character—what does each method emphasize?

  5. You're writing an essay analyzing how an author develops a complex antagonist. Which characterization methods would provide the strongest evidence, and why?