Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Characterization is the engine that drives every story you'll read this year. When you understand how authors build characters, you unlock deeper analysis skills for everything from short stories to novels to the texts on your exams. You're not just being tested on whether you can identify a protagonist—you're being tested on whether you can explain how an author reveals that character's personality, motivations, and growth through specific techniques.
Think of characterization as a toolkit authors use to show you who someone really is. Some tools are obvious (the narrator tells you directly), while others require you to play detective (inferring from actions, dialogue, or what others say). Mastering these methods helps you write stronger literary analysis essays and ace questions about author's craft. Don't just memorize the terms—know what each technique accomplishes and be ready to spot examples in any text.
Authors reveal characters in two fundamental ways: telling you outright or showing you through evidence. Understanding this distinction is the foundation for analyzing any character in literature.
Compare: Direct vs. Indirect Characterization—both reveal character traits, but direct tells while indirect shows. If an essay prompt asks about author's craft or character development, focus on indirect methods since they demonstrate more sophisticated technique.
Most indirect characterization falls into five categories you can remember with the acronym STEAL: Speech, Thoughts, Effects on others, Actions, and Looks. These are your go-to tools for any character analysis.
Compare: Dialogue vs. Thoughts—both reveal what a character is thinking, but dialogue shows their public self while thoughts show their private self. The gap between these is often where the most interesting character analysis lives.
Compare: Actions vs. Reactions—actions show what a character does, while reactions show what a character causes. Both reveal character, but from opposite angles. Strong analysis considers both.
These techniques work alongside STEAL to create fully realized characters. They often appear in combination with other methods rather than standing alone.
Compare: Physical Description vs. Background—both provide context for who a character is, but physical description shows the external self while background reveals how they became that self. Use both in essays about character development.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Direct Characterization | Narrator statements, character introductions, explicit trait labels |
| Speech/Dialogue | Word choice, tone, dialect, what's left unsaid |
| Thoughts/Feelings | Internal monologue, emotional reactions, private motivations |
| Actions/Behavior | Choices under pressure, consistent patterns, pivotal decisions |
| Effects on Others | Other characters' reactions, reputation, social dynamics |
| Physical Description | Appearance, clothing, body language, grooming |
| Background/History | Flashbacks, exposition, formative experiences |
| STEAL Acronym | Speech, Thoughts, Effects, Actions, Looks |
What is the key difference between direct and indirect characterization, and why do exam questions tend to focus more on indirect methods?
Which two STEAL methods both reveal a character's thinking, and how do they differ in what they show about the character's public versus private self?
If a character says "I'm fine" but the narrator describes them clenching their fists and avoiding eye contact, which characterization methods are being used, and what do they reveal?
Compare and contrast how physical description and background/history both provide context for a character—what does each method emphasize?
You're writing an essay analyzing how an author develops a complex antagonist. Which characterization methods would provide the strongest evidence, and why?