Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Cadences are the punctuation marks of music—they tell listeners when a phrase pauses, when a section ends, and when the composer wants to pull the rug out from under your expectations. You're being tested on your ability to recognize harmonic function, voice leading, and compositional intent through these crucial moments. Understanding cadences isn't just about identifying chord progressions; it's about explaining why a passage feels complete, why tension lingers, or why a resolution surprises us.
In harmonic analysis, cadences reveal how composers manipulate tonal expectations to create emotional impact. Whether you're analyzing a Bach chorale or a pop song, the same principles apply: tension and release, expectation and surprise, motion and rest. Don't just memorize which chords appear in each cadence—know what each cadence does to the listener and why a composer would choose one over another.
These cadences provide the strongest sense of arrival and closure. The dominant-to-tonic motion () represents the most fundamental harmonic resolution in tonal music, with voice leading that pulls tendency tones to their expected destinations.
Compare: PAC vs. IAC—both use dominant-to-tonic motion, but PAC requires root position and tonic in soprano while IAC relaxes one or more of these conditions. On an FRQ asking about phrase structure, identifying why a cadence feels weaker often matters more than just naming it.
These cadences stop the motion but leave harmonic tension unresolved. Ending on the dominant chord maintains the pull toward tonic, creating anticipation for what comes next.
Compare: Standard HC vs. Phrygian HC—both end on , but the Phrygian type specifically requires the approach chord with its distinctive stepwise bass descent. If you hear a half cadence in minor with a particularly "old" or "Spanish" sound, check for that chord.
These cadences exploit the listener's anticipation of resolution, redirecting harmonic motion to create surprise or extend phrases. The dominant chord sets up an expectation of tonic arrival that the composer deliberately thwarts.
Compare: Deceptive vs. Interrupted Cadence—in most American theory pedagogy, these terms describe the same motion. Some traditions distinguish them based on context or continuation. Know your course's preferred terminology.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Strongest resolution | PAC |
| Weaker authentic resolution | IAC, Plagal Cadence |
| Pause on dominant | Half Cadence, Phrygian Half Cadence |
| Surprise/subverted expectation | Deceptive Cadence, Interrupted Cadence |
| Prolongation through avoidance | Evaded Cadence |
| motion | PAC, IAC |
| motion | Plagal Cadence |
| Minor-key specialty | Phrygian Half Cadence |
Both PAC and IAC involve motion—what specific conditions must be met for a cadence to qualify as "perfect" rather than "imperfect"?
You're analyzing a phrase that ends on a chord with the bass moving by step from to . What type of cadence is this, and what chord precedes the dominant?
Compare and contrast the deceptive cadence and the evaded cadence. How do they each manipulate listener expectations, and at what point in the cadential process does each "break the rules"?
A hymn ends with a progression after a PAC has already occurred. What is this cadence called, and why might a composer add it after the piece has already achieved full resolution?
If an FRQ asks you to explain how a composer extends a phrase beyond its expected length, which cadence types would best support your argument, and why?