Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Atmospheric stability is the engine behind nearly every weather phenomenon you'll encounter on exams—from why some days produce towering thunderstorms while others stay stubbornly clear, to why pollution gets trapped over cities during certain conditions. You're being tested on your ability to compare lapse rates, predict air parcel behavior, and explain the physical mechanisms that drive convection, cloud formation, and severe weather development.
The key insight here is that stability isn't just a single concept—it's a comparison game. Every stability determination comes down to asking: "How does the environmental lapse rate compare to the rate at which a rising parcel cools?" Master this comparison framework, and you'll be able to tackle any stability problem thrown at you. Don't just memorize definitions—know which lapse rate matters when, and what happens to air parcels under each condition.
Before diving into stability types, you need to understand the three lapse rates that govern everything. Stability is determined by comparing the environmental lapse rate to the adiabatic lapse rates—this comparison tells you whether a displaced air parcel will keep moving or return to its starting point.
Compare: Dry Adiabatic () vs. Moist Adiabatic ()—both describe cooling rates for rising air, but the moist rate is slower due to latent heat release. If an FRQ asks why clouds form at a certain altitude, explain the transition from dry to moist adiabatic cooling at the lifting condensation level.
These three categories form the foundation of stability analysis. The key is comparing the environmental lapse rate (ELR) to both adiabatic rates and determining how a displaced parcel will behave.
Compare: Absolutely Stable vs. Absolutely Unstable—both are determined by comparing ELR to adiabatic rates, but stable conditions suppress vertical motion while unstable conditions enhance it. On FRQs about severe weather, identify what pushed the atmosphere from stable to unstable (surface heating, cold air aloft, etc.).
Some atmospheric conditions appear stable initially but can become unstable when triggered. These "hidden" instabilities are crucial for forecasting severe weather because they represent stored potential energy waiting to be released.
Compare: Convective Instability vs. Potential Instability—both describe initially stable air that becomes unstable, but convective instability emphasizes surface heating while potential instability emphasizes mechanical lifting. Both are critical concepts for explaining why "cap" or "lid" conditions can lead to explosive storm development.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Suppressed vertical motion | Absolutely stable, inversion layers |
| Enhanced vertical motion | Absolutely unstable, convective instability |
| Moisture-dependent stability | Conditionally stable |
| Triggered instability | Convective instability, potential instability |
| Reference cooling rates | Dry adiabatic (), moist adiabatic () |
| Diagnostic measurement | Environmental lapse rate |
| Well-mixed conditions | Neutral stability |
| Air quality impacts | Inversion layers, absolutely stable |
If the environmental lapse rate is , what is the stability classification for unsaturated air? What about saturated air?
Which two stability types both involve initially stable air that can become unstable, and what distinguishes the triggering mechanism for each?
Compare absolutely stable and absolutely unstable conditions: how does each affect cloud type, air quality, and turbulence?
An FRQ describes a summer afternoon with intense surface heating and cool air aloft. Which stability type is developing, and what weather would you predict?
Why does the moist adiabatic lapse rate vary with temperature while the dry adiabatic lapse rate remains constant? What physical process explains this difference?