Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Truth table symbols are the alphabet of formal logic—without fluency in these symbols, you can't read, write, or evaluate logical arguments. You're being tested not just on recognizing what each symbol means, but on understanding how they transform truth values and when specific combinations yield true or false results. The connectives you'll learn here—conjunction, disjunction, negation, conditional, and biconditional—show up in every proof, every argument analysis, and every validity question you'll encounter.
Master these symbols and you'll be able to construct truth tables quickly, spot logical equivalences, and evaluate complex compound statements with confidence. Don't just memorize the symbols—know the truth conditions for each connective and understand why certain combinations produce the results they do. When you see , you should immediately think about what makes it false, not just what it "means" in English.
Before you can evaluate any compound statement, you need the two fundamental truth values that every proposition must take. In classical logic, every statement is either true or false—never both, never neither.
Compare: T vs. F—these are mutually exclusive and exhaustive values. Every proposition gets exactly one. On exams, errors often come from miscounting rows: a truth table with variables needs rows to capture all T/F combinations.
Negation is the only connective that operates on a single proposition. It flips the truth value—nothing more, nothing less.
Compare: Negation vs. other connectives—negation is unary (one input), while all others are binary (two inputs). If an exam asks which connective can stand alone with a single proposition, negation is your answer.
These connectives yield true only when their component propositions align in specific ways. Conjunction demands both be true; biconditional demands both match.
Compare: Conjunction (∧) vs. Biconditional (↔)—conjunction requires both inputs to be true; biconditional requires both inputs to match (both true OR both false). On truth tables, conjunction has one T row; biconditional has two T rows.
Disjunction is the most permissive binary connective. It only fails when everything fails.
Compare: Conjunction (∧) vs. Disjunction (∨)—conjunction has one T row (both true); disjunction has one F row (both false). These are duals of each other, connected by De Morgan's Laws: .
The conditional causes more confusion than any other connective because its truth conditions don't match everyday "if-then" intuitions. Focus on the one case that makes it false.
Compare: Conditional (→) vs. Biconditional (↔)—the conditional is asymmetric (direction matters); the biconditional is symmetric (works both ways). A common exam trap: is NOT equivalent to , but IS equivalent to .
| Concept | Key Symbols | Truth Condition |
|---|---|---|
| Truth Values | T, F | Assigned to every proposition |
| Negation | ¬, ~ | Flips the value |
| Conjunction | ∧, & | True only if BOTH true |
| Disjunction | ∨ | False only if BOTH false |
| Conditional | →, ⊃ | False only if T → F |
| Biconditional | ↔, ≡ | True if values MATCH |
| Strictest connective | ∧ | One T row |
| Most permissive connective | ∨ | One F row |
Which two connectives yield true when both propositions are true AND when both are false? How do they differ in the mixed cases?
You're building a truth table for . How many rows do you need, and in which row(s) will the final column show T?
Compare the conditional (→) and biconditional (↔): if is false and is true, what truth value does each connective produce? Why?
A classmate claims that and are logically equivalent. Using truth table reasoning, explain why this is incorrect and identify what these two statements actually represent.
Which connective is the only unary operator, and how does this affect the structure of its truth table compared to binary connectives?