Why This Matters
Triangle similarity is one of the most powerful tools in your geometry toolkitโand it shows up everywhere on exams. When you understand similarity, you unlock the ability to solve problems involving indirect measurement, proportional reasoning, and geometric proofs. You're being tested on your ability to recognize when triangles are similar, why a particular criterion applies, and how to use that relationship to find missing measurements.
The key insight? Similar triangles have the same shape but different sizes, which means their corresponding angles are equal and their corresponding sides are proportional. This single concept connects to dilations, parallel line theorems, scale factors, and real-world applications like calculating heights you can't measure directly. Don't just memorize the three criteriaโknow what each one requires and when to use it.
The Three Similarity Criteria
These are your primary tools for proving triangles are similar. Each criterion gives you a different "shortcut" so you don't have to verify all angles AND all sidesโjust enough information to guarantee similarity.
Angle-Angle (AA) Similarity
- Two pairs of congruent anglesโthat's all you need, since the third angle is automatically determined by the Triangle Angle Sum Theorem
- No side lengths required, making AA the most commonly used criterion when angle measures are given or can be found
- Best for parallel line problems where alternate interior or corresponding angles create the congruent pairs you need
Side-Angle-Side (SAS) Similarity
- One pair of congruent angles with the sides that form that angle in proportionโthe angle must be the included angle between the two sides
- Ratio of sides matters, not actual lengths; if DEABโ=DFACโ and โ Aโ
โ D, you've got SAS similarity
- Use when you have mixed informationโsome angle measures and some side lengths, but not enough for AA or SSS
Side-Side-Side (SSS) Similarity
- All three pairs of corresponding sides must be proportionalโsame ratio for every pair
- No angle information needed, making this ideal when you're given only side lengths
- Check all three ratios: if DEABโ=EFBCโ=DFACโ, the triangles are similar
Compare: AA vs. SAS vs. SSSโall three prove similarity, but they require different given information. AA needs only angles (easiest to use with parallel lines), SAS needs one angle plus two proportional sides, and SSS needs all sides proportional. On proofs, identify what you're given first, then choose the matching criterion.
Foundational Concepts
Before you can apply the criteria, you need to understand what similarity actually means and how to work with the measurements involved.
Definition of Similar Triangles
- Same shape, different sizeโcorresponding angles are congruent, and corresponding sides are proportional
- Notation matters: โณABCโผโณDEF means โ Aโ
โ D, โ Bโ
โ E, โ Cโ
โ F, and the sides follow the same order
- Foundation for all similarity workโif you can't identify which parts correspond, you can't set up correct proportions
Scale Factor
- The ratio of corresponding side lengths between similar triangles, often written as k
- Determines enlargement or reduction: k>1 means the second triangle is larger; k<1 means it's smaller
- Use it to find unknowns: if k=3 and one side of the smaller triangle is 4, the corresponding side of the larger triangle is 4ร3=12
Corresponding Parts
- Corresponding angles are equal; corresponding sides are proportionalโthis is the defining property of similar triangles
- Order in the similarity statement tells you everything: in โณABCโผโณXYZ, side AB corresponds to XY, BC to YZ, and AC to XZ
- Misidentifying corresponding parts is the most common error on similarity problemsโalways match vertices carefully
Compare: Scale factor vs. individual side ratiosโthe scale factor is the single constant ratio that applies to all corresponding sides. If your ratios aren't equal, the triangles aren't similar. This is a quick check before committing to a proof.
These extend your similarity toolkit beyond the basic criteria, connecting similarity to parallel lines and transformations.
Triangle Proportionality Theorem (Parallel Line Theorem)
- A line parallel to one side of a triangle divides the other two sides proportionally
- Creates similar triangles: the smaller triangle formed is similar to the original by AA (parallel lines create congruent corresponding angles)
- Key setup for many proofs: look for parallel lines as your signal to apply this theorem
- Dilation preserves shape but changes sizeโthe definition of a similarity transformation
- Center point and scale factor determine the transformation: every point moves along a ray from the center, multiplied by the scale factor
- Proves similarity visually: if one triangle is a dilation of another, they're similar by definition
Compare: Parallel Line Theorem vs. Dilationโboth create similar triangles, but through different mechanisms. The Parallel Line Theorem works within a single figure (cutting a triangle with a parallel line), while dilation transforms one entire triangle into another. FRQs may ask you to justify similarity using either approach.
Applications and Proof Strategies
This is where similarity becomes a problem-solving powerhouse.
Real-World Applications
- Indirect measurement uses similar triangles to find heights or distances you can't measure directlyโlike using shadows to calculate building heights
- Scale models and maps rely on similarity; the scale factor converts between model measurements and real-world dimensions
- Architecture and engineering use proportional reasoning from similar triangles to ensure structural accuracy
Writing Similarity Proofs
- Identify your given information first, then select the appropriate criterion (AA, SAS, or SSS)
- State corresponding parts explicitlyโwhich angles are congruent? Which sides are proportional? Show your work
- End with a clear conclusion: "Therefore, โณABCโผโณDEF by [criterion]"
Compare: Proving similarity vs. using similarityโproofs establish that triangles are similar (using AA, SAS, or SSS), while applications use established similarity to find missing measurements. On exams, read carefully to determine which task you're being asked to do.
Quick Reference Table
|
| Proving similarity with angles only | AA Criterion, Parallel Line Theorem |
| Proving similarity with sides only | SSS Criterion |
| Proving similarity with mixed info | SAS Criterion |
| Finding unknown lengths | Scale Factor, Corresponding Parts |
| Justifying similarity through transformation | Dilation |
| Real-world problem solving | Indirect Measurement, Scale Models |
| Setting up proportions | Corresponding Parts, Scale Factor |
Self-Check Questions
-
Two triangles have two pairs of congruent angles. Which similarity criterion applies, and why don't you need to check the third angle?
-
You're given that DEABโ=EFBCโ=2, but DFACโ=3. Are the triangles similar? Explain your reasoning.
-
Compare and contrast SAS Similarity with SAS Congruenceโwhat's the key difference in what you're checking for the sides?
-
A line is drawn parallel to side BC of โณABC, intersecting AB at point D and AC at point E. Explain why โณADEโผโณABC and identify which criterion you'd use in a proof.
-
If the scale factor from โณPQR to โณXYZ is 52โ, and PQ=10, what is XY? What does this scale factor tell you about the relative sizes of the triangles?