Triangle Congruence Postulates

Why This Matters

Triangle congruence is the foundation of geometric proof—and you'll use these postulates constantly throughout Honors Geometry. When you prove two triangles are congruent, you unlock the ability to conclude that all their corresponding parts are equal (that's CPCTC—Corresponding Parts of Congruent Triangles are Congruent). This becomes your go-to strategy for proving segments equal, angles equal, or lines parallel in complex figures.

Here's what you're really being tested on: pattern recognition, strategic thinking, and logical justification. The five congruence postulates aren't just rules to memorize—they're tools for deciding what minimum information guarantees two triangles are identical. Don't just memorize the acronyms; know which postulate applies when you're given certain information, and understand why some combinations (like SSA) don't work while others do.

---

Side-Based Postulates

These postulates prioritize side measurements. When you have information about multiple sides, these are your first options to consider. The key principle: sides determine the "skeleton" of a triangle, and enough side information locks in the shape completely.

Side-Side-Side (SSS)

• Three pairs of congruent sides—if all three sides of one triangle equal all three sides of another, the triangles must be congruent
• No angle information required—this is the only postulate that works with sides alone, making it ideal when angle measures aren't given
• Works for all triangle types—scalene, isosceles, or equilateral; the shape is completely determined by its three side lengths

Side-Angle-Side (SAS)

• Two sides and the INCLUDED angle—the angle must be sandwiched between the two sides you're comparing
• Order matters critically—Side-Angle-Side means the angle is in the middle; if the angle isn't included, this postulate doesn't apply
• Most commonly used postulate—appears frequently in proofs because diagrams often give you adjacent sides sharing a vertex angle

---

Angle-Based Postulates

These postulates work when you have strong angle information. The underlying principle: two angles of a triangle determine the third (since angles sum to $180°$), so angle-heavy information can be just as powerful as side measurements.

Angle-Side-Angle (ASA)

• Two angles and the INCLUDED side—the side must be between the two angles, meaning it connects their vertices
• The "mirror image" of SAS—instead of an angle between two sides, you have a side between two angles
• Powerful for parallel line problems—when parallel lines create alternate interior angles, ASA often emerges naturally

Angle-Angle-Side (AAS)

• Two angles and a NON-INCLUDED side—the side can be anywhere, not necessarily between the two angles
• Logically equivalent to ASA—since two angles determine the third, AAS gives you the same information as ASA, just packaged differently
• Flexible positioning—useful when the congruent side isn't conveniently located between your known angles

---

Special Case: Right Triangles

Right triangles have built-in structure that allows for a streamlined congruence test. The Pythagorean relationship means the hypotenuse and one leg actually determine the entire triangle.

Hypotenuse-Leg (HL)

• Right triangles only—you must first establish that both triangles have a right angle ($90°$) before using HL
• Hypotenuse + one leg—if the hypotenuse and any one leg are congruent, the triangles are congruent
• A special case of SSS logic—the Pythagorean theorem ($a^2 + b^2 = c^2$) means knowing the hypotenuse and one leg determines the third side

---

Why SSA Doesn't Work

You might wonder why Side-Side-Angle (when the angle is NOT included) isn't a valid postulate. The ambiguous case: given two sides and a non-included angle, you can sometimes construct two different triangles—one acute and one obtuse. This ambiguity means SSA cannot guarantee congruence. Never use SSA as a reason in a proof.

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. You're given that two triangles share a common side and have two pairs of congruent sides total. Which postulate should you consider first, and what additional information would you need?

2. Compare and contrast ASA and AAS: What do they have in common, and how do you decide which one applies in a proof?

3. A diagram shows two right triangles with congruent hypotenuses. What's the minimum additional information needed to prove them congruent, and which postulate would you use?

4. Why does SSA fail as a congruence postulate, while SAS works? What's the geometric difference?

5. If an FRQ asks you to prove two segments are congruent and those segments are corresponding parts of two triangles, outline the two-step strategy you would use.