Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Urban dance styles aren't just entertainment—they're living archives of social history, community identity, and cultural resistance. When you study these forms, you're examining how marginalized communities transformed limited resources and public spaces into powerful platforms for self-expression. Each style emerged from specific urban conditions: economic hardship, racial tension, LGBTQ+ liberation movements, and the search for belonging in rapidly changing cities.
You're being tested on your ability to connect artistic expression to broader themes of urbanization, cultural diffusion, and social movements. The AP exam loves asking how art reflects and shapes urban identity, so don't just memorize when and where these dances started—know what social conditions they responded to and how they spread from local neighborhoods to global phenomena.
The late 1960s and early 1970s saw California become a laboratory for movement innovation, as dancers translated the rhythmic complexity of funk music into distinct physical vocabularies. These styles prioritized individual virtuosity and precise muscle control, reflecting both the competitive nature of street performance and the influence of soul and funk aesthetics.
Compare: Popping vs. Locking—both emerged from California funk culture, but popping emphasizes internal muscle control while locking focuses on external theatrical expression. If an FRQ asks about how the same cultural moment produces different artistic responses, this pairing works perfectly.
New York City's South Bronx became ground zero for hip-hop culture in the 1970s, with dance serving as one of the four foundational elements alongside DJing, MCing, and graffiti. These styles emerged directly from urban decay—abandoned buildings, block parties, and youth seeking alternatives to gang violence.
Compare: Breaking vs. Hip-Hop Dance—breaking is a specific, codified style with defined elements, while hip-hop dance is a broader category that absorbs and remixes multiple influences. Understanding this distinction helps when exam questions ask about cultural specificity versus cultural fusion.
Dance floors in Chicago, New York, and Los Angeles became laboratories for styles that prioritized musicality, social connection, and the creation of safe spaces for marginalized communities. These forms often emerged from LGBTQ+ and Black and Latino communities who faced exclusion from mainstream entertainment venues.
Compare: Voguing vs. Waacking—both emerged from LGBTQ+ communities of color and emphasize dramatic self-presentation, but voguing developed in competitive ball culture while waacking grew from disco club floors. Both demonstrate how marginalized communities create art that celebrates rather than hides identity.
The 2000s saw new styles emerge that prioritized raw emotional expression and narrative storytelling, often in response to ongoing urban challenges. Social media accelerated the spread of these forms far beyond their neighborhoods of origin.
Compare: Krumping vs. Flexing—both emerged from specific urban neighborhoods as responses to hardship, but krumping emphasizes explosive release while flexing prioritizes controlled illusion. Both demonstrate how dance functions as therapy and testimony in challenging environments.
Some urban dance styles prioritize technical mastery and visual illusion over emotional expression, treating the body as an instrument for creating impossible-seeming effects.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Funk-era West Coast origins | Popping, Locking, Waacking |
| Hip-hop culture foundations | Breaking, Hip-hop dance |
| LGBTQ+ community expression | Voguing, Waacking |
| Emotional release/social commentary | Krumping, Flexing |
| Club/nightlife culture | House dance, Voguing, Waacking |
| Technical precision/illusion | Tutting, Popping, Flexing |
| Battle/competition culture | Breaking, Voguing |
| California origins | Popping, Locking, Waacking, Krumping |
| New York origins | Breaking, House dance, Voguing, Flexing |
Which two styles both emerged from LGBTQ+ communities but developed in different cities and decades? What do their similarities reveal about how marginalized groups use art for identity expression?
Compare and contrast krumping and flexing: What urban conditions produced each style, and how do their movement vocabularies reflect different responses to similar challenges?
If an FRQ asked you to explain how a single musical genre (funk) produced multiple distinct dance styles, which three examples would you use and what would you emphasize about each?
Breaking and voguing both feature competitive "battle" formats. How do these competition structures reflect the communities that created them, and what social functions do they serve beyond entertainment?
Which styles demonstrate the role of television and social media in cultural diffusion? How did media exposure change these dance forms as they spread beyond their original communities?