Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
When you're designing curriculum for young children, you're not just picking activities out of a hat—you're making decisions grounded in how children actually learn, grow, and make sense of their world. These developmental theories aren't abstract academic concepts; they're the frameworks that explain why certain teaching strategies work and others fall flat. You'll be tested on your ability to connect specific classroom practices to their theoretical foundations, whether that's understanding why a child needs scaffolding during a challenging task or why consistent caregiver relationships matter so much in infant programs.
Here's what you need to internalize: each theory emphasizes different drivers of development—cognitive construction, social interaction, biological maturation, environmental systems, or behavioral conditioning. The exam will ask you to identify which theory applies to a given scenario, compare how different theorists would approach the same classroom situation, and explain how these ideas translate into curriculum decisions. Don't just memorize names and stages—know what mechanism each theorist believes powers development and how that shapes what educators should do.
These theories focus on how children actively construct knowledge through their own mental processes and experiences. Development happens when children encounter new information and work to make sense of it.
Compare: Piaget vs. Gardner—both see children as active learners with internal cognitive processes, but Piaget emphasizes universal stages while Gardner emphasizes individual variation in types of intelligence. If an exam question asks about differentiated instruction, Gardner is your go-to theorist.
These theories position other people—caregivers, peers, teachers, and culture itself—as central to how children develop. Learning is fundamentally a social process.
Compare: Vygotsky vs. Bandura—both emphasize learning from others, but Vygotsky focuses on guided instruction within the ZPD while Bandura focuses on observation and imitation without direct teaching. Think: scaffolded math lesson (Vygotsky) vs. child copying an older sibling's behavior (Bandura).
These theories focus on how children develop a sense of self, navigate relationships, and build moral understanding. Development involves resolving internal conflicts and forming identity.
Compare: Erikson vs. Kohlberg—both describe development through stages driven by social experience, but Erikson addresses emotional and identity development while Kohlberg focuses specifically on moral reasoning. Erikson's early stages are more relevant to infant-toddler curriculum; Kohlberg becomes more applicable in preschool and beyond.
These theories zoom out to examine how the broader environment—family, community, culture, and society—influences children's growth. Development cannot be understood apart from context.
Compare: Bronfenbrenner vs. Vygotsky—both emphasize social and cultural context, but Vygotsky focuses on immediate social interaction while Bronfenbrenner maps multiple layers of environmental influence. Use Bronfenbrenner when discussing family engagement or community partnerships.
These theories emphasize the role of genetics, physical maturation, and innate biological processes in development. Some aspects of development unfold on a biological schedule.
Compare: Gesell vs. Piaget—both describe sequential development, but Gesell attributes it to biological maturation while Piaget emphasizes active cognitive construction. Gesell would say "wait until the child is ready"; Piaget would say "provide rich experiences that challenge current thinking."
These theories focus on observable behavior and the environmental conditions that strengthen or weaken it. Learning is the result of conditioning processes.
Compare: Skinner vs. Bandura—both focus on how behaviors are learned, but Skinner emphasizes direct reinforcement of the learner's own behavior while Bandura includes vicarious learning through observation. Skinner requires the child to perform the behavior first; Bandura allows learning before any behavior occurs.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Active cognitive construction | Piaget, Gardner |
| Social interaction as driver | Vygotsky, Bandura, Erikson |
| Attachment and emotional development | Bowlby, Erikson |
| Environmental/contextual influences | Bronfenbrenner, Vygotsky |
| Biological maturation | Gesell |
| Behavioral conditioning | Skinner, Bandura |
| Stage-based development | Piaget, Erikson, Kohlberg |
| Individual differences in learning | Gardner |
A teacher provides temporary support during a challenging puzzle, gradually reducing help as the child gains competence. Which two theories best explain this practice, and how do they differ in their emphasis?
If a child consistently seeks caregiver approval before exploring new activities, which theory would you use to explain this behavior, and what attachment style might be indicated?
Compare how Gesell and Piaget would each explain why a three-year-old cannot yet perform conservation tasks. What different curriculum recommendations might follow from each perspective?
A preschooler watches an older child receive praise for sharing and then begins sharing toys herself. Identify the theory that explains this and describe the key mechanism at work.
An FRQ asks you to design a curriculum that addresses the "whole child" across multiple developmental domains. Which three theories would you combine, and what specific element would each contribute?