Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Chaucer's The Canterbury Tales isn't just a collection of medieval stories—it's a masterclass in how literature reflects and critiques society. When you're analyzing these themes, you're being tested on your ability to recognize social commentary, character as archetype, narrative framing, and the tension between ideals and reality. The exam will ask you to connect specific tales and pilgrims to broader thematic concerns, so understanding the "why" behind Chaucer's choices is essential.
Think of the Tales as Chaucer's grand experiment in holding a mirror up to 14th-century England. Every pilgrim, every story, every bawdy joke serves a purpose: exposing the gap between what people claim to value and how they actually behave. Don't just memorize which pilgrim tells which tale—know what each character and narrative reveals about medieval attitudes toward class, faith, gender, and human nature. That's where the real exam points live.
Chaucer's genius lies in his ability to skewer society while appearing to simply tell entertaining stories. Through irony, caricature, and strategic juxtaposition, he exposes the flaws of every social class without ever preaching directly.
Compare: The Pardoner vs. the Parson—both are Church figures, but one embodies corruption while the other represents genuine piety. If an FRQ asks about Chaucer's view of religious institutions, use these two as contrasting evidence.
Medieval England was saturated with religious language and ritual, but Chaucer probes whether this outward piety reflects genuine faith. The tension between doctrine and practice runs through nearly every tale.
Compare: The Knight's Tale vs. The Miller's Tale—both follow the pilgrimage's opening, but one treats fate and honor seriously while the other parodies those same themes. This juxtaposition is Chaucer's commentary on how genre shapes meaning.
Chaucer explores romantic relationships with remarkable nuance, presenting multiple competing views rather than a single authoritative position. The "Marriage Group" of tales directly debates questions of power and partnership.
Compare: The Wife of Bath's Prologue vs. The Clerk's Tale—both address marriage and female submission, but from radically different angles. The Wife demands sovereignty; Patient Griselda embodies extreme obedience. Chaucer never tells us which is "right."
Chaucer was deeply interested in how stories work—how they shape identity, transmit values, and create meaning. The frame narrative itself becomes a theme.
Compare: The Monk's Tale vs. The Nun's Priest's Tale—both address fortune and tragedy, but the Monk offers dreary repetition while the Nun's Priest transforms the theme into comedy. Same concept, radically different tones—perfect for analyzing Chaucer's range.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Clerical corruption | Pardoner, Friar, Summoner |
| Marriage debate | Wife of Bath, Clerk, Franklin |
| Chivalric ideals | Knight's Tale, Sir Thopas (parody) |
| Class critique | General Prologue portraits, Miller vs. Reeve |
| Fortune and fate | Knight's Tale, Monk's Tale, Nun's Priest's Tale |
| Female agency | Wife of Bath, Patient Griselda (contrast) |
| Narrative self-consciousness | Frame narrative, Chaucer's own interrupted tales |
| Religious sincerity | Parson (genuine) vs. Pardoner (corrupt) |
Which two pilgrims best illustrate Chaucer's contrast between genuine and hypocritical religious practice, and what specific details support this comparison?
How do the Wife of Bath's Prologue and the Clerk's Tale present opposing views on marriage—and why might Chaucer refuse to resolve this debate?
If an FRQ asked you to analyze how Chaucer uses narrative structure to develop theme, which aspects of the frame narrative would you discuss?
Compare the Knight's Tale and the Miller's Tale: how does Chaucer use genre (romance vs. fabliau) to explore the same themes of love and competition differently?
What does Chaucer suggest about the relationship between social class and moral virtue? Identify at least two pilgrims whose characterization supports your argument.