Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Sustainable fishing sits at the intersection of ecology, economics, and human behavior—three forces you'll see collide throughout this course. When you study these practices, you're really learning how humans attempt to manage common pool resources, prevent the tragedy of the commons, and balance short-term harvests against long-term ecosystem health. Every method here represents a different approach to the same fundamental problem: how do we take from nature without taking too much?
Don't just memorize what each practice does—understand why it works and which conservation principle it demonstrates. Exam questions will ask you to compare approaches, identify which method fits a specific scenario, or explain why one strategy succeeds where another fails. Know the mechanism behind each practice, and you'll be ready for anything the test throws at you.
These practices directly regulate how many fish leave the water. They work by controlling harvest pressure—the simplest and most direct way to prevent population collapse.
Compare: Catch quotas vs. size limits—both control harvest, but quotas cap total numbers while size limits shape population structure. Size limits protect reproductive capacity even when quotas are met. If an FRQ asks about maintaining genetic diversity in a fishery, size limits are your stronger example.
These methods recognize that fish don't exist in isolation. Protecting where fish live and what they interact with is just as critical as controlling how many we catch.
Compare: MPAs vs. EBFM—MPAs protect specific places, while EBFM changes how we fish everywhere. MPAs are spatially explicit; EBFM is process-oriented. Strong FRQ answers mention both as complementary strategies.
Fishing isn't precise—nets and hooks catch more than intended. These practices reduce collateral damage to non-target species and habitats.
Compare: Selective gear vs. bycatch reduction devices—selective gear prevents unwanted catch from entering, while BRDs allow escape after entry. Both reduce bycatch, but selective gear is proactive and BRDs are reactive. Know examples of each.
These approaches shift pressure away from wild stocks by changing how seafood is produced and consumed.
Compare: Aquaculture vs. traceability—aquaculture addresses supply by creating alternatives, while traceability addresses demand by changing consumer behavior. Both reduce pressure on wild stocks through different mechanisms. Aquaculture is production-side; traceability is market-side.
Top-down regulations only work when people follow them. These practices build local buy-in and shared responsibility for fisheries health.
Compare: Community-based management vs. government quotas—both limit harvest, but community approaches are bottom-up while quotas are top-down. Community management works best in small-scale fisheries with strong social cohesion; quotas suit large industrial fisheries. FRQs may ask you to recommend approaches for different contexts.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Direct population control | Catch quotas, seasonal closures, size limits |
| Spatial protection | Marine Protected Areas, no-take zones |
| Ecosystem thinking | Ecosystem-Based Fisheries Management, adaptive management |
| Bycatch reduction | Selective gear, BRDs, TEDs, circle hooks |
| Alternative supply | Aquaculture, fish farming |
| Market-based solutions | Traceability, eco-labeling, MSC certification |
| Local governance | Community-based management, customary marine tenure |
| Reproductive protection | Spawning closures, minimum size limits |
Which two practices specifically protect fish during their reproductive life stages, and how do their mechanisms differ?
A coastal community wants to reduce sea turtle deaths in their shrimp fishery. Which practice would be most effective, and what device would you recommend they implement?
Compare and contrast Marine Protected Areas with Ecosystem-Based Fisheries Management—what does each approach prioritize, and how might they work together?
If an FRQ describes a fishery where regulations exist but compliance is low, which management approach would you recommend and why?
Aquaculture is often called a solution to overfishing, but it creates its own sustainability challenges. Identify two environmental concerns associated with fish farming and explain how they might be addressed.