upgrade
upgrade

🫂Human Resource Management

Succession Planning Steps

Study smarter with Fiveable

Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.

Get Started

Why This Matters

Succession planning sits at the intersection of several critical HR concepts you'll encounter throughout your studies: talent management, organizational development, strategic HR alignment, and workforce planning. When exam questions probe leadership continuity or ask how organizations prepare for inevitable turnover, they're testing whether you understand that succession planning isn't just about replacing people—it's about building organizational capability and reducing institutional risk. This process demonstrates how HR functions strategically rather than reactively.

The steps in succession planning reveal a fundamental truth about modern HR management: people are assets that require intentional investment. You're being tested on your ability to connect individual development activities to broader organizational outcomes, and to recognize how different HR functions—recruitment, training, performance management—must work together as an integrated system. Don't just memorize these steps in order; know what strategic purpose each step serves and how they build upon one another.


Foundation: Identifying What Matters Most

Before any development can happen, organizations must understand where their vulnerabilities lie. This diagnostic phase establishes the strategic focus for all subsequent succession activities.

Identify Key Positions and Roles

  • Critical role analysis—determine which positions have the greatest impact on business operations, strategy execution, and competitive advantage
  • Risk assessment considers roles that are difficult to fill externally, have long learning curves, or experience high turnover rates
  • Strategic alignment ensures focus remains on positions that drive organizational success rather than simply those with impressive titles

Develop Competency Models for Critical Roles

  • Competency frameworks define the specific skills, knowledge, and behaviors required for success in each key position
  • Organizational alignment connects these models to company values and strategic objectives, creating a blueprint for what "ready" looks like
  • Multi-purpose application—these models guide not just succession planning but also recruitment, performance evaluation, and training design

Compare: Identifying key positions vs. developing competency models—both are diagnostic steps, but the first asks "where are we vulnerable?" while the second asks "what does success look like?" FRQ tip: If asked about succession planning foundations, discuss how these two steps work together to create targeted development efforts.


Assessment: Understanding Your Talent Landscape

Once you know what roles matter and what success requires, the next phase involves honestly evaluating current talent against those standards.

Assess Current Talent and Potential Successors

  • Performance evaluation uses existing review data and assessments to identify employees who demonstrate both current capability and future potential
  • Dual-criteria analysis examines both technical competence and leadership qualities—high performers aren't automatically high-potentials
  • Succession readiness categorizes candidates by timeline: ready now, ready in 1-2 years, or developmental candidates

Conduct Regular Talent Reviews

  • Periodic assessment cycles ensure succession plans remain current as employees develop, leave, or as business needs shift
  • Stakeholder involvement brings diverse perspectives from multiple leaders, reducing bias and blind spots in talent identification
  • Data-driven decisions leverage performance metrics, assessment results, and development progress to inform objective talent discussions

Compare: Initial talent assessment vs. regular talent reviews—the first creates a baseline understanding, while reviews ensure that understanding stays accurate over time. Both combat the dangerous assumption that talent landscapes remain static.


Development: Building Future Leaders

Assessment without action is merely an academic exercise. This phase translates insights into intentional growth activities.

Create Individual Development Plans

  • Personalized roadmaps address each successor's specific skill gaps while honoring their career aspirations and learning preferences
  • Structured accountability includes clear goals, realistic timelines, and identified resources—transforming vague intentions into measurable commitments
  • Dynamic documents require regular review and updating as employees progress and organizational needs evolve

Implement Leadership Training Programs

  • Competency-based curriculum targets the specific leadership skills identified in competency models rather than generic management topics
  • Experiential learning through mentorship, coaching, stretch assignments, and job rotations accelerates development beyond classroom training alone
  • Effectiveness measurement uses feedback mechanisms and performance metrics to evaluate program ROI and identify needed adjustments

Build a Talent Pipeline

  • Systematic identification creates processes for continuously spotting and nurturing potential leaders at all organizational levels
  • Proactive strategies combine internal development with external recruitment to ensure a steady flow of qualified candidates
  • Retention focus fosters a culture of continuous learning and growth that keeps high-potential employees engaged and committed

Compare: Individual development plans vs. leadership training programs—IDPs are personalized and successor-specific, while training programs address common leadership competencies across multiple candidates. Effective succession planning requires both individual and programmatic approaches working in concert.


Integration: Connecting to the Bigger Picture

Succession planning cannot exist in isolation. Its effectiveness depends on alignment with broader organizational systems and transparent communication.

Integrate Succession Planning with Overall HR Strategy

  • Strategic coherence ensures succession efforts align with recruitment strategies, performance management systems, and organizational objectives
  • Cross-functional collaboration connects succession planning with compensation, workforce planning, and talent acquisition to create mutually reinforcing HR initiatives
  • Cultural embedding communicates the importance of succession planning throughout the organization, making leadership development everyone's responsibility

Communicate the Succession Plan to Stakeholders

  • Transparent processes clearly articulate how succession decisions are made, building trust and perceived fairness among employees
  • Multi-level engagement involves both senior leadership (for strategic buy-in) and employees (for developmental motivation)
  • Regular updates maintain momentum and accountability by sharing progress on succession initiatives

Compare: HR strategy integration vs. stakeholder communication—integration is about structural alignment of systems, while communication is about human alignment of understanding and commitment. Both are necessary for succession planning to move from policy to practice.


Evaluation: Ensuring Continuous Improvement

The final phase closes the loop, treating succession planning as an ongoing process rather than a one-time project.

Monitor and Evaluate the Succession Planning Process

  • Success metrics track outcomes like internal promotion rates, time-to-fill for key positions, and successor performance post-transition
  • Continuous improvement uses regular outcome reviews and stakeholder feedback to refine processes and address emerging gaps
  • Institutional learning documents lessons learned from both successful transitions and failures to strengthen future succession efforts

Compare: Regular talent reviews vs. process monitoring—talent reviews evaluate people (are our successors developing?), while process monitoring evaluates the system (is our succession planning approach working?). Both feedback loops are essential.


Quick Reference Table

ConceptBest Examples
Diagnostic/Foundation StepsIdentify key positions, Develop competency models
Assessment ActivitiesAssess current talent, Conduct talent reviews
Development InterventionsIndividual development plans, Leadership training, Talent pipeline
Integration EffortsHR strategy alignment, Stakeholder communication
Evaluation MechanismsProcess monitoring, Success metrics, Lessons learned
Risk ReductionCritical role analysis, Pipeline building, Regular reviews
Strategic AlignmentCompetency models, HR integration, Organizational objectives
Continuous ImprovementTalent reviews, Process evaluation, Plan updates

Self-Check Questions

  1. Which two steps work together to establish the foundation for targeted development efforts, and how do they differ in focus?

  2. Explain the difference between assessing current talent and conducting regular talent reviews. Why does effective succession planning require both?

  3. Compare individual development plans and leadership training programs. In what situations might an organization emphasize one over the other?

  4. If an FRQ asked you to describe how succession planning connects to broader HR strategy, which steps would you reference and why?

  5. A company successfully identifies key positions and high-potential employees but still experiences leadership gaps during transitions. Based on the succession planning process, what steps might they be neglecting, and how would strengthening those steps address the problem?