Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Succession planning sits at the intersection of several critical HR concepts you'll encounter throughout your studies: talent management, organizational development, strategic HR alignment, and workforce planning. When exam questions probe leadership continuity or ask how organizations prepare for inevitable turnover, they're testing whether you understand that succession planning isn't just about replacing people—it's about building organizational capability and reducing institutional risk. This process demonstrates how HR functions strategically rather than reactively.
The steps in succession planning reveal a fundamental truth about modern HR management: people are assets that require intentional investment. You're being tested on your ability to connect individual development activities to broader organizational outcomes, and to recognize how different HR functions—recruitment, training, performance management—must work together as an integrated system. Don't just memorize these steps in order; know what strategic purpose each step serves and how they build upon one another.
Before any development can happen, organizations must understand where their vulnerabilities lie. This diagnostic phase establishes the strategic focus for all subsequent succession activities.
Compare: Identifying key positions vs. developing competency models—both are diagnostic steps, but the first asks "where are we vulnerable?" while the second asks "what does success look like?" FRQ tip: If asked about succession planning foundations, discuss how these two steps work together to create targeted development efforts.
Once you know what roles matter and what success requires, the next phase involves honestly evaluating current talent against those standards.
Compare: Initial talent assessment vs. regular talent reviews—the first creates a baseline understanding, while reviews ensure that understanding stays accurate over time. Both combat the dangerous assumption that talent landscapes remain static.
Assessment without action is merely an academic exercise. This phase translates insights into intentional growth activities.
Compare: Individual development plans vs. leadership training programs—IDPs are personalized and successor-specific, while training programs address common leadership competencies across multiple candidates. Effective succession planning requires both individual and programmatic approaches working in concert.
Succession planning cannot exist in isolation. Its effectiveness depends on alignment with broader organizational systems and transparent communication.
Compare: HR strategy integration vs. stakeholder communication—integration is about structural alignment of systems, while communication is about human alignment of understanding and commitment. Both are necessary for succession planning to move from policy to practice.
The final phase closes the loop, treating succession planning as an ongoing process rather than a one-time project.
Compare: Regular talent reviews vs. process monitoring—talent reviews evaluate people (are our successors developing?), while process monitoring evaluates the system (is our succession planning approach working?). Both feedback loops are essential.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Diagnostic/Foundation Steps | Identify key positions, Develop competency models |
| Assessment Activities | Assess current talent, Conduct talent reviews |
| Development Interventions | Individual development plans, Leadership training, Talent pipeline |
| Integration Efforts | HR strategy alignment, Stakeholder communication |
| Evaluation Mechanisms | Process monitoring, Success metrics, Lessons learned |
| Risk Reduction | Critical role analysis, Pipeline building, Regular reviews |
| Strategic Alignment | Competency models, HR integration, Organizational objectives |
| Continuous Improvement | Talent reviews, Process evaluation, Plan updates |
Which two steps work together to establish the foundation for targeted development efforts, and how do they differ in focus?
Explain the difference between assessing current talent and conducting regular talent reviews. Why does effective succession planning require both?
Compare individual development plans and leadership training programs. In what situations might an organization emphasize one over the other?
If an FRQ asked you to describe how succession planning connects to broader HR strategy, which steps would you reference and why?
A company successfully identifies key positions and high-potential employees but still experiences leadership gaps during transitions. Based on the succession planning process, what steps might they be neglecting, and how would strengthening those steps address the problem?