Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
When you're covering business and economics, stock market indices are your shorthand for understanding how markets—and by extension, economies—are performing. But here's what separates sharp financial reporters from those who just parrot numbers: you need to understand what each index actually measures and why its methodology matters. A 500-point drop in the Dow means something very different than a 500-point drop in the S&P 500, and confusing the two will undermine your credibility fast.
You're being tested on your ability to distinguish between weighting methodologies, geographic scope, sector composition, and market capitalization focus. These aren't just technical details—they determine which stories each index tells. The S&P 500 reflects big American corporate health; the Russell 2000 signals how Main Street businesses are faring. Don't just memorize the numbers—know what economic narrative each index reveals and when to use each one in your reporting.
These indices aim to capture the overall health of a nation's stock market, serving as the go-to references for general market performance. Their breadth makes them reliable proxies for economic sentiment, but their weighting methods affect how you interpret their movements.
Compare: S&P 500 vs. NASDAQ Composite—both are market-cap weighted U.S. indices, but the S&P 500 represents diversified sector exposure while NASDAQ skews heavily toward tech. When tech rallies, NASDAQ outperforms; when tech crashes, NASDAQ falls harder. Use this distinction when explaining why indices diverge on the same trading day.
Unlike most modern indices, these calculate their value based on stock prices rather than company size. This means a $200 stock moves the index twice as much as a $100 stock, regardless of which company is actually larger.
Compare: DJIA vs. S&P 500—both track large U.S. companies, but the Dow's price-weighting and 30-stock limitation make it less representative. The S&P 500 is the professional standard; the Dow persists mainly due to brand recognition and historical significance. When they diverge significantly, that's often a story worth exploring.
Small-cap indices track smaller companies that tend to be more domestically focused and economically sensitive. They often serve as leading indicators because smaller firms feel economic shifts before multinational giants do.
Compare: Russell 2000 vs. S&P 500—the S&P tracks large multinational corporations while the Russell 2000 reflects smaller, domestically focused businesses. When the Russell outperforms, it often signals confidence in U.S. economic growth; when it lags, investors may be seeking safety in large-cap stability.
These indices serve as primary benchmarks for Europe's largest economies, offering insight into regional economic health and serving as proxies for eurozone and UK sentiment.
Compare: FTSE 100 vs. DAX—both are leading European indices, but the FTSE reflects UK/global multinational performance while the DAX tracks Germany's industrial and export-driven economy. Post-Brexit, their divergence often signals differing UK vs. eurozone economic trajectories.
Asian indices provide crucial insight into the world's fastest-growing economic region, each reflecting distinct market structures and regulatory environments.
Compare: Hang Seng vs. Shanghai Composite—both reflect Chinese economic health, but the Hang Seng is more globally integrated and accessible to foreign investors, while the Shanghai Composite is more insulated and policy-driven. When they diverge, it often signals differing domestic vs. international investor sentiment on China.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Broad U.S. market benchmark | S&P 500, NASDAQ Composite |
| Price-weighted methodology | DJIA, Nikkei 225 |
| Small-cap/domestic focus | Russell 2000 |
| Technology sector indicator | NASDAQ Composite |
| European market health | FTSE 100, DAX |
| Asian market sentiment | Nikkei 225, Hang Seng, Shanghai Composite |
| Global diversification benchmark | MSCI World Index |
| Leading economic indicator | Russell 2000 |
Methodology comparison: Why might the Dow Jones Industrial Average and S&P 500 show different percentage changes on the same trading day, even though both track large U.S. companies?
Sector identification: Which index would you cite when reporting on a story about tech industry performance, and why is it more appropriate than the S&P 500?
Geographic analysis: A source claims "Asian markets fell overnight." Which two or three indices would you check to verify this claim, and what different aspects of Asian markets does each represent?
Economic indicator: Your editor asks which index best reflects the health of small American businesses and might serve as a leading indicator for the broader economy. Which index do you recommend and why?
Compare and contrast: Explain to a reader why the FTSE 100 might rise on a day when UK economic news is negative. What characteristic of this index explains this apparent contradiction?