Stakeholder Analysis Techniques

Why This Matters

Stakeholder analysis isn't just a box to check before launching a project—it's the foundation of strategic decision-making. You're being tested on your ability to identify who matters, why they matter, and how to engage them effectively. These techniques appear throughout business courses because they connect directly to concepts like power dynamics, organizational behavior, change management, and ethical decision-making. Master these tools, and you'll understand why some projects sail through approval while others face unexpected resistance.

The real exam challenge isn't memorizing technique names—it's knowing when to use which tool and what each reveals about stakeholder relationships. A Power/Interest Grid and a Salience Model might seem similar, but they answer different strategic questions. Don't just memorize definitions; know what problem each technique solves and how they complement each other in real-world scenarios.

---

Identification and Discovery Techniques

Before you can analyze stakeholders, you need to find them. These foundational methods ensure you capture the full landscape of individuals and groups who can influence—or be influenced by—your decisions.

Stakeholder Identification

• Systematic discovery process—identifies all individuals, groups, or organizations that can affect or are affected by a project, preventing costly oversights later
• Categorization by role and influence helps segment stakeholders into meaningful groups for targeted analysis
• Data gathering methods include interviews, surveys, and brainstorming sessions to ensure comprehensive coverage beyond obvious players

Social Network Analysis

• Relationship mapping reveals hidden influence patterns and informal power structures that formal org charts miss
• Key influencer identification pinpoints communication bottlenecks and potential champions within stakeholder networks
• Strategic leverage opportunities emerge when you understand how information and influence flow through social connections

---

Prioritization Matrices

Once you've identified stakeholders, you need to decide where to focus limited time and resources. These matrix-based tools use two or more dimensions to classify stakeholders and guide engagement priorities.

Power/Interest Grid

• Two-axis classification plots stakeholders by their level of power (ability to affect outcomes) and interest (degree of concern about the project)
• Four quadrants emerge: Manage Closely (high power/high interest), Keep Satisfied (high power/low interest), Keep Informed (low power/high interest), Monitor (low power/low interest)
• Visual prioritization makes it immediately clear which stakeholders demand the most attention and communication resources

Influence/Impact Matrix

• Dual evaluation criteria assess both stakeholder influence over the project and the project's impact on them
• Risk and opportunity identification highlights stakeholders who could derail progress or become powerful advocates
• Strategic resource allocation ensures engagement efforts target stakeholders with the highest combined scores

Salience Model (Power, Legitimacy, Urgency)

• Three-attribute assessment evaluates stakeholders on power (ability to influence), legitimacy (perceived validity of their claim), and urgency (time-sensitivity of their needs)
• Seven stakeholder types emerge from attribute combinations, from Dormant (power only) to Definitive (all three attributes)
• Dynamic prioritization recognizes that stakeholder salience shifts as project circumstances change

---

Visual Mapping Tools

Sometimes you need to see the big picture. These techniques create visual representations of stakeholder ecosystems, revealing relationships and dynamics that lists and matrices can miss.

Stakeholder Mapping

• Relationship visualization diagrams connections and influence dynamics among multiple stakeholders simultaneously
• Alliance identification reveals potential coalitions—both supportive and resistant—that could affect project outcomes
• Contextual understanding shows how stakeholders interact with each other, not just with the project

Stakeholder Circle

• Concentric visualization arranges stakeholders by proximity to the project, with those closest having the greatest potential impact
• Influence and interest integration combines both dimensions in a single intuitive graphic
• Communication strategy development becomes easier when you can see at a glance which stakeholders occupy each ring

---

Role Clarification Tools

Knowing who matters is only half the battle—you also need clarity on who does what. These techniques define responsibilities and engagement levels to prevent confusion and ensure accountability.

RACI Matrix

• Four-role framework assigns each stakeholder as Responsible (does the work), Accountable (owns the outcome), Consulted (provides input), or Informed (receives updates)
• Accountability clarity ensures exactly one person is accountable for each task, eliminating finger-pointing
• Communication efficiency reduces noise by specifying who needs to be in the loop versus who just needs status updates

Stakeholder Engagement Assessment Matrix

• Current state analysis evaluates existing engagement levels against desired engagement levels for each stakeholder
• Gap identification reveals where relationships need strengthening and where communication is falling short
• Targeted strategy development creates specific action plans to move stakeholders from Unaware to Supportive (or manage those who are Resistant)

---

Investment and Commitment Analysis

Some stakeholders have more skin in the game than others. These techniques measure the depth of stakeholder investment to predict behavior and resistance.

Vested Interest-Impact Index

• Investment measurement quantifies how much stakeholders have riding on project success or failure—financially, reputationally, or operationally
• Behavioral prediction identifies stakeholders likely to resist change (high negative impact) or champion initiatives (high positive stake)
• Proactive risk management highlights potential blockers early, allowing for mitigation strategies before opposition solidifies

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. Which two techniques would you combine to first identify stakeholders and then understand how they influence each other informally?

2. A project manager needs to quickly categorize 20 stakeholders to decide communication frequency. Which technique offers the fastest visual prioritization, and what are its four quadrants?

3. Compare and contrast the Power/Interest Grid and the Salience Model. When would the additional dimension of the Salience Model provide critical insight that the Grid cannot?

4. Your team is confused about who approves deliverables versus who just needs status updates. Which technique resolves this, and what do each of its four letters represent?

5. An FRQ asks you to predict which stakeholders will resist a major organizational change. Which technique best measures personal investment in outcomes, and how does it differ from the Influence/Impact Matrix?