Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Language acquisition is one of the most remarkable feats of human cognition—and it happens largely without formal instruction. Understanding the stages of acquisition reveals how phonology, morphology, syntax, and semantics develop in predictable patterns across all typically developing children, regardless of which language they're learning. You're being tested on your ability to identify what linguistic knowledge emerges at each stage and why the sequence unfolds the way it does.
Don't just memorize age ranges—know what each stage demonstrates about the child's developing linguistic competence. Exam questions often ask you to identify a stage from a speech sample, explain what grammatical features are present or absent, or compare how different linguistic components (sounds vs. syntax vs. meaning) develop at different rates. The key insight? Children aren't just imitating adults; they're actively constructing a grammar based on the input they receive.
Before children produce recognizable words, they're already developing crucial prerequisites for language: turn-taking, intentional communication, and phonetic discrimination. These stages demonstrate that language is fundamentally social and that infants are tuned into linguistic patterns from the start.
Compare: Prelinguistic vs. Babbling Stage—both occur before meaningful speech, but babbling shows emerging phonological structure while prelinguistic vocalizations (crying, cooing) lack systematic sound patterns. If asked to identify the onset of phonetic development, babbling is your answer.
The transition to meaningful speech marks a critical shift: children must now coordinate phonological forms with semantic content. These stages reveal how vocabulary and conceptual development interact, and why context is essential for interpreting early speech.
Compare: Holophrastic vs. Telegraphic Speech—both stages show vocabulary-grammar mismatches, but telegraphic speech reveals syntactic knowledge (word order, semantic roles) that holophrases cannot demonstrate. FRQs often provide utterances and ask you to identify the stage and justify your answer.
Once children move beyond two-word combinations, their grammar develops rapidly. These stages showcase the acquisition of morphology, complex syntax, and pragmatic competence—and reveal that children don't just imitate but actively hypothesize rules.
Compare: Early vs. Later Multiword Stages—both involve sentences longer than two words, but the later stage shows mastery of bound morphology and complex syntax. Overgeneralization errors ("goed") peak in the early stage and decline as children learn exceptions.
By school age, children have acquired the core grammar of their language and can use it flexibly across contexts. This stage demonstrates that acquisition involves not just structure but metalinguistic awareness and stylistic variation.
Compare: Later Multiword vs. Adult-Like Stage—both feature complex sentences, but the adult-like stage adds metalinguistic awareness and pragmatic sophistication. A 3-year-old can produce a grammatical sentence; a 6-year-old can explain why it's grammatical.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Pre-verbal communication | Prelinguistic Stage, Babbling Stage |
| Phonological development | Babbling Stage (canonical → variegated) |
| Vocabulary-grammar mismatch | Holophrastic Stage, Telegraphic Speech |
| Emerging syntax | Two-Word Stage, Early Multiword Stage |
| Morphological overgeneralization | Early Multiword Stage ("goed," "foots") |
| Complex syntax mastery | Later Multiword Stage, Adult-Like Stage |
| Pragmatic/metalinguistic skills | Later Multiword Stage, Adult-Like Stage |
| Evidence against pure imitation | Overgeneralization errors, consistent word order in telegraphic speech |
A child says "doggy goed outside." What stage is this, and what does the error reveal about the child's grammatical knowledge?
Compare the holophrastic stage and telegraphic speech: what specific linguistic evidence distinguishes a child at 14 months from a child at 20 months?
Which two stages provide the strongest evidence that children are not simply imitating adult speech? Explain what phenomena in each stage support this claim.
If an FRQ presents the utterance "want more cookie please," what stage would you identify, and what features (present and absent) justify your answer?
Why does phonetic perception narrow during the prelinguistic stage, and how does this relate to the transition into babbling?