Wave functions are the mathematical heart of quantum mechanics—they encode everything measurable about a quantum system. When you're tested on this material, you're not just being asked to recall formulas. You're being evaluated on whether you understand why certain wave functions take their particular forms, how boundary conditions and potential shapes determine quantization, and what physical principles connect seemingly different systems like a particle in a box and the hydrogen atom.
The wave functions covered here demonstrate core concepts you'll see throughout the course: energy quantization, normalization, orthogonality, the uncertainty principle, and the transition between classical and quantum behavior. Each example illustrates a different mathematical technique—from separation of variables to special functions like Hermite polynomials and spherical harmonics. Don't just memorize the functional forms; know what conceptual principle each wave function demonstrates and when you'd use it as a model for real physical systems.
Bound States in Confining Potentials
These wave functions arise when particles are trapped by potential energy barriers. The confinement forces wave functions to satisfy boundary conditions, which directly produces energy quantization.
Particle in a Box (Infinite Square Well)
Sinusoidal standing wavesψn(x)=L2sin(Lnπx)—the simplest exactly solvable quantum system with rigid boundary conditions
Quantized energies scale as En=2mL2n2π2ℏ2, demonstrating that confinement alone produces discrete energy levels
Nodes increase with quantum number—ψn has exactly n−1 interior nodes, a pattern that generalizes to other bound systems
Finite Square Well
Piecewise wave functions with sinusoidal behavior inside the well and exponential decay outside—more physically realistic than the infinite well
Tunneling into classically forbidden regions occurs because ψ(x)=0 where E<V0, a purely quantum phenomenon
Finite number of bound states exists depending on well depth and width, unlike the infinite well's unlimited spectrum
Delta Function Potential
Single bound stateψ(x)=ℏmαe−mα∣x∣/ℏ2 for an attractive delta potential V(x)=−αδ(x)
Derivative discontinuity at x=0 encodes the strength of the point interaction—a key boundary condition technique
Scattering applications make this potential essential for modeling localized impurities and resonance phenomena
Compare: Infinite vs. Finite Square Well—both produce quantized bound states through confinement, but the finite well allows tunneling and has a limited number of bound states. FRQs often ask you to explain what changes physically when walls become penetrable.
Harmonic and Oscillatory Systems
The harmonic oscillator potential V(x)=21mω2x2 appears everywhere in physics because any smooth potential looks quadratic near its minimum. Mastering this system unlocks quantum field theory and molecular physics.
Harmonic Oscillator
Hermite-Gaussian wave functionsψn(x)=NnHn(ξ)e−ξ2/2 where ξ=mω/ℏx—the Gaussian envelope times Hermite polynomials
Equally spaced energy levelsEn=ℏω(n+21) with nonzero ground state energy, demonstrating zero-point motion
Ladder operator method provides an elegant algebraic solution using a^ and a^†, foundational for quantum field theory
Coherent States
Minimum uncertainty states satisfying Δx⋅Δp=ℏ/2—as close to classical behavior as quantum mechanics allows
Eigenstates of the annihilation operatora^∣α⟩=α∣α⟩, making them mathematically tractable for calculations
Stable time evolution where the wave packet oscillates without changing shape—essential for modeling laser light
Compare: Harmonic oscillator eigenstates vs. coherent states—both solve the same Hamiltonian, but eigenstates are stationary with definite energy while coherent states are superpositions that evolve classically. This distinction is crucial for quantum optics problems.
Central Potentials and Angular Momentum
When potentials depend only on distance from a center, separation of variables in spherical coordinates splits the problem into radial and angular parts. The angular solutions are universal.
Spherical Harmonics
Angular eigenfunctionsYlm(θ,ϕ) satisfy L^2Ylm=ℏ2l(l+1)Ylm and L^zYlm=ℏmYlm
Orthonormal and complete on the sphere—any angular function can be expanded in spherical harmonics
Orbital shapes in atoms correspond to ∣Ylm∣2: s-orbitals (l=0), p-orbitals (l=1), d-orbitals (l=2), etc.
Hydrogen Atom
Full 3D wave functionsψnlm(r,θ,ϕ)=Rnl(r)Ylm(θ,ϕ) with radial functions involving Laguerre polynomials
Three quantum numbers emerge: n (principal, sets energy), l (angular momentum magnitude), m (z-component)
Energy depends only onn: En=−n213.6 eV, producing the characteristic hydrogen spectrum and degeneracy
Compare: Spherical harmonics vs. hydrogen wave functions—spherical harmonics describe angular behavior for any central potential, while hydrogen wave functions include the specific radial dependence from the Coulomb potential. Know when to use each.
Free Particles and Wave Packets
Without confining potentials, energy is continuous rather than quantized. These wave functions illustrate momentum eigenstates and the uncertainty principle in action.
Free Particle
Plane wave solutionsψk(x)=Aei(kx−ωt) are momentum eigenstates with definite p=ℏk
Continuous energy spectrumE=2mℏ2k2 reflects the absence of boundary conditions
Non-normalizable in infinite space—physically, free particles must be described by wave packets
Gaussian Wave Packet
Localized superpositionψ(x,0)=(2πσ21)1/4e−x2/4σ2eik0x combines position localization with average momentum
Minimum uncertainty at t=0 with Δx⋅Δp=ℏ/2—the tightest localization quantum mechanics allows
Dispersion over time causes the packet to spread as different momentum components travel at different speeds
Compare: Free particle plane wave vs. Gaussian wave packet—plane waves have definite momentum but infinite position uncertainty; Gaussian packets sacrifice some momentum precision to achieve localization. This tradeoff embodies the uncertainty principle.
Superposition and Quantum Foundations
These wave functions highlight the conceptual foundations of quantum mechanics, including superposition, measurement, and the quantum-classical boundary.
Schrödinger Cat States
Macroscopic superpositions∣ψ⟩=21(∣alive⟩+∣dead⟩) illustrate quantum superposition at extreme scales
Decoherence sensitivity explains why such states are never observed—environmental interactions rapidly destroy superpositions
Measurement problem connection makes these states central to interpretational debates about wave function collapse
Quick Reference Table
Concept
Best Examples
Energy quantization from boundary conditions
Particle in a box, Finite square well, Hydrogen atom
Both the infinite square well and the harmonic oscillator produce quantized energy levels. What is fundamentally different about the spacing of these levels, and what causes this difference?
Which two wave functions from this guide achieve minimum uncertainty Δx⋅Δp=ℏ/2, and why is this property physically significant?
Compare the hydrogen atom wave functions and spherical harmonics: if you needed to describe a particle in a different central potential (not Coulomb), which parts of the hydrogen solution could you reuse and which would change?
A free particle plane wave and a Gaussian wave packet both describe unbound particles. Explain why only one is physically realizable and how the other serves as a mathematical building block.
If an FRQ asks you to find bound state energies for a novel potential well, which wave function from this guide provides the best template for your approach—and what boundary conditions would you apply?