Significant Social Movements in Global Politics

Why This Matters

Social movements are the engine of political change—and AP Comparative Government tests you on how and why citizens mobilize to challenge state authority. You're not just being tested on what happened; you're expected to understand the mechanisms that make movements succeed or fail. This means connecting movements to concepts like civil society strength, regime legitimacy, political participation, and democratization. Whether a movement topples an authoritarian regime or gets crushed depends on factors you'll analyze across all six course countries.

These movements illustrate core tensions in comparative politics: state versus society, individual rights versus collective order, democratic transitions versus authoritarian resilience. When you study the Solidarity movement in Poland alongside Tiananmen Square in China, you're really comparing how different regime types respond to challenges to their legitimacy. Don't just memorize dates and leaders—know what concept each movement illustrates and be ready to use them as evidence in FRQs.

---

Movements Challenging Authoritarian Regimes

These movements directly confronted non-democratic governments, testing whether civil society could force political liberalization. The key variable is regime response: some governments negotiated transitions, while others used coercion to maintain power.

Pro-Democracy Movements in Eastern Europe

• Solidarity in Poland (1980s)—the first independent trade union in a Soviet-bloc country, demonstrating how civil society organizations can erode authoritarian legitimacy from within
• Velvet Revolution in Czechoslovakia (1989)—a largely nonviolent transition showing how peaceful transfers of power can occur when regimes lose coercive capacity and popular support
• Democratization outcomes—these movements led to multiparty elections and EU integration, making them textbook examples of successful regime change through sustained civic mobilization

Tiananmen Square Protests (China, 1989)

• Pro-democracy demonstrations—students and workers demanded political reform, free press, and an end to corruption, directly challenging CCP legitimacy
• Government crackdown—the violent suppression illustrates how authoritarian regimes use coercion to maintain power when legitimacy is threatened
• Lasting restrictions on civil society—China subsequently tightened controls on NGOs and media, showing how regimes learn to prevent future mobilization through preemptive repression

Iranian Revolution (1979)

• Overthrow of the Pahlavi monarchy—a coalition of Islamists, leftists, and liberals toppled a U.S.-backed authoritarian regime, demonstrating how diverse coalitions can achieve regime change
• Establishment of theocratic rule—Ayatollah Khomeini's Islamic Republic replaced one authoritarian system with another, illustrating that revolution doesn't guarantee democratization
• Transformation of state-society relations—the revolution fundamentally restructured Iranian governance around religious authority, a key example of traditional legitimacy in modern politics

---

Anti-Colonial and Independence Movements

These movements sought to end foreign domination and establish sovereign nation-states. They demonstrate how nationalism and civil disobedience can delegitimize colonial rule and force political transitions.

Indian Independence Movement

• Nonviolent resistance (satyagraha)—Gandhi's strategy of civil disobedience demonstrated how sustained peaceful protest can undermine colonial legitimacy without armed conflict
• Mass mobilization across classes—the movement united peasants, merchants, and intellectuals, showing how broad coalitions increase movement effectiveness
• 1947 independence and partition—success came with the traumatic division into India and Pakistan, illustrating how decolonization can create new ethnic and religious conflicts

Anti-Colonial Movements (Africa, Asia, Caribbean)

• Mid-20th century decolonization wave—movements in Algeria, Kenya, Ghana, Vietnam, and elsewhere ended European empires, fundamentally reshaping the international system
• Varied strategies—some used armed struggle (Algeria, Vietnam), others emphasized negotiation (Ghana), showing multiple paths to achieving self-determination
• Post-independence challenges—many new states struggled with weak institutions and arbitrary colonial borders, creating ongoing governance problems tested in AP Comp Gov

Anti-Apartheid Movement (South Africa)

• Dismantling institutionalized racism—the movement challenged a system of legal racial segregation, making it a key example of civil society confronting state-sponsored discrimination
• International pressure and sanctions—global boycotts and divestment campaigns show how transnational advocacy can support domestic movements
• Negotiated transition (1994)—Nelson Mandela's election demonstrated successful peaceful transfer of power and became a model for transitional justice through the Truth and Reconciliation Commission

---

Movements Expanding Political Rights Within Democracies

These movements operated within existing democratic systems to expand who counts as a full citizen. They illustrate how civil society pushes democracies to live up to their stated ideals.

Civil Rights Movement (United States)

• Ending legal segregation—the movement dismantled Jim Crow laws through litigation, protest, and legislation, showing how civil society can force policy change in democracies
• Key legislation achieved—the Civil Rights Act (1964) and Voting Rights Act (1965) expanded political participation and became models for anti-discrimination law globally
• Nonviolent direct action—tactics like sit-ins and marches demonstrated how peaceful protest can shift public opinion and pressure legislators

Women's Suffrage Movement

• Securing voting rights—movements in the U.S., UK, and elsewhere expanded the electorate to include women, fundamentally changing democratic participation
• Varied national timelines—New Zealand (1893) led; Switzerland didn't grant women's suffrage until 1971, showing how political culture shapes reform pace
• Foundation for broader feminism—suffrage victories enabled subsequent movements for workplace equality, reproductive rights, and political representation

LGBTQ+ Rights Movement

• Marriage equality and anti-discrimination protections—the movement has achieved legal recognition in many democracies while facing criminalization in others
• Stonewall Riots (1969)—this watershed moment catalyzed organized activism, demonstrating how critical events can spark sustained mobilization
• Global variation in outcomes—legal same-sex marriage in some countries contrasts with persecution elsewhere, making this useful for comparing civil liberties across regime types

---

Movements Responding to Economic Grievances

These movements emerged from dissatisfaction with economic conditions, labor exploitation, or the effects of liberalization policies. They demonstrate the link between economic policy and political stability.

Labor Rights Movement

• Improving wages and working conditions—unions and strikes forced governments and employers to recognize worker rights, fundamentally shaping industrial economies
• Collective bargaining power—the formation of trade unions like the AFL-CIO created organized interest groups that could negotiate with both employers and the state
• Policy outcomes—movements achieved minimum wage laws, workplace safety regulations, and limits on working hours, showing how civil society shapes economic policy

Arab Spring (2010-2012)

• Economic grievances as catalyst—high unemployment, corruption, and rising food prices sparked protests, demonstrating how policy effectiveness affects regime legitimacy
• Varied outcomes across countries—Tunisia achieved democratic transition; Egypt saw military reassertion; Syria descended into civil war, showing how regime type and institutional strength shape responses
• Social media mobilization—digital tools enabled rapid coordination, illustrating how technology changes political participation patterns

Mexican Student Movement of 1968

• Challenging PRI authoritarianism—students demanded democratic reforms and an end to single-party dominance, highlighting tensions in hybrid regimes
• Tlatelolco massacre—government violence against protesters exposed the regime's reliance on coercion rather than legitimate authority
• Long-term democratization—the movement planted seeds for Mexico's eventual transition to competitive elections, showing how failed movements can still shift political culture

---

Contemporary Movements and Digital Mobilization

These recent movements use new technologies and transnational networks to challenge systemic injustices. They illustrate evolving forms of political participation in the digital age.

Black Lives Matter

• Challenging systemic racism—the movement addresses police violence, mass incarceration, and racial inequality, demonstrating how civil society can force issues onto the policy agenda
• Decentralized structure—unlike earlier movements with clear hierarchies, BLM operates through loose networks, representing a new model of political organization
• Policy impacts—the movement has influenced debates on police reform, prosecutorial accountability, and racial equity, showing how sustained protest affects policy outcomes

#MeToo Movement

• Addressing sexual harassment and assault—the movement exposed widespread abuse across industries, demonstrating how social media can amplify marginalized voices
• Transnational spread—#MeToo resonated globally, with movements emerging in India, China, and France, showing how civil society operates across borders
• Institutional accountability—the movement led to resignations, prosecutions, and policy changes in workplaces, illustrating how public pressure can shift organizational behavior

Environmental Movement

• Climate change and sustainability—movements like Fridays for Future demand policy action on emissions, connecting to AP Comp Gov topics on industrialization and economic development
• Transnational coordination—groups like Greenpeace and 350.org operate globally, exemplifying international civil society and NGO influence
• Policy tensions—environmental demands often conflict with economic growth priorities, creating debates about development models and state capacity to enforce regulations

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. Which two movements both achieved regime change through largely nonviolent means but in different regime contexts (colonial vs. domestic racial)? What strategy did they share?

2. Compare the outcomes of pro-democracy movements in Eastern Europe (1989) and China (1989). What factors explain why one succeeded in achieving democratization while the other was suppressed?

3. Identify two movements that emerged primarily from economic grievances rather than demands for political rights. How did economic conditions affect regime legitimacy in each case?

4. If an FRQ asked you to explain how civil society can challenge authoritarian regimes, which three movements would provide the strongest contrasting evidence of success and failure?

5. Compare Black Lives Matter and the Civil Rights Movement in terms of organizational structure, primary targets (state vs. society), and methods of mobilization. What do the differences reveal about how political participation has evolved?