upgrade
upgrade

Significant Policy Changes

Study smarter with Fiveable

Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.

Get Started

Why This Matters

When you study significant policy changes, you're not just memorizing dates and provisions—you're learning to analyze how governments respond to economic pressures, security threats, public health crises, and shifting global power dynamics. These policies reveal the tensions between national sovereignty and international cooperation, economic growth and social welfare, and security concerns and diplomatic engagement. Understanding the mechanisms behind these decisions helps you connect current events to broader patterns in governance and international relations.

Each policy change in this guide illustrates a specific type of governmental response: some prioritize multilateral cooperation, others assert national interests, and still others attempt to balance competing domestic constituencies. Don't just memorize what each policy does—know why it was enacted, what problem it aimed to solve, and how it reflects larger ideological or geopolitical trends. That's what you'll be tested on.


Multilateral Agreements and International Cooperation

These policies demonstrate how nations work together to address challenges that cross borders. The underlying principle is that some problems—climate change, trade disputes, nuclear proliferation—require coordinated action because no single country can solve them alone.

Paris Agreement on Climate Change

  • Limits global warming to well below 2°C—this target represents the scientific consensus on avoiding catastrophic climate impacts
  • Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) allow each country to set its own emissions reduction goals, balancing ambition with sovereignty
  • Climate finance provisions address the equity concern that developing nations shouldn't bear equal costs for a problem industrialized nations created

Iran Nuclear Deal (JCPOA)

  • Traded sanctions relief for nuclear limits—Iran agreed to reduce uranium enrichment in exchange for lifted economic restrictions
  • U.S. withdrawal in 2018 reimposed sanctions and demonstrated how executive agreements can be reversed by subsequent administrations
  • Regional stability implications highlight the connection between nuclear policy and broader Middle East security dynamics

Compare: Paris Agreement vs. Iran Nuclear Deal—both relied on multilateral negotiation to address global threats, but the Paris Agreement's voluntary structure has proven more durable than the JCPOA's binding terms. This illustrates how enforcement mechanisms affect policy longevity.


Trade Policy and Economic Nationalism

These policies reflect the tension between free trade orthodoxy and protectionist impulses. The mechanism at work is governments using tariffs, trade agreements, and regulatory standards to shape economic outcomes and assert national interests.

USMCA (Replacement for NAFTA)

  • Raised North American content requirements for automobiles—vehicles must contain 75% regional content (up from 62.5%) for tariff-free status
  • Strengthened labor and environmental standards reflect progressive critiques that earlier trade deals prioritized corporate interests
  • Digital trade provisions updated the framework for an economy that barely existed when NAFTA was signed in 1994

US-China Trade War

  • Tariffs targeted trade imbalances and IP theft—the U.S. imposed duties on hundreds of billions in Chinese goods starting in 2018
  • Retaliatory tariffs from China affected American agriculture and manufacturing, demonstrating how trade conflicts create domestic winners and losers
  • Decoupling concerns raised questions about whether the world's two largest economies can maintain integrated supply chains amid strategic competition

Compare: USMCA vs. US-China Trade War—both emerged from dissatisfaction with existing trade arrangements, but USMCA sought to reform a multilateral framework while the trade war represented unilateral action. If asked about approaches to trade policy, these represent cooperative versus confrontational strategies.


Domestic Policy Reform

These changes show how governments restructure internal systems to address perceived failures or shift ideological direction. The principle here is that major domestic reforms typically require political alignment between executive and legislative branches and reflect changing public priorities.

Affordable Care Act (Obamacare)

  • Expanded coverage through Medicaid expansion and insurance marketplaces—reduced the uninsured rate from about 16% to under 9%
  • Pre-existing condition protections prevented insurers from denying coverage or charging more based on health status
  • Individual mandate required insurance coverage or a tax penalty, creating a mechanism to prevent adverse selection in insurance markets

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017

  • Cut corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%—the largest reduction in corporate taxes in U.S. history, based on supply-side economic theory
  • Doubled the standard deduction simplified filing for many households while reducing itemized deduction benefits
  • Eliminated the individual mandate penalty—effectively undermined an ACA provision without full repeal

Compare: ACA vs. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act—these represent opposing approaches to government's economic role. The ACA expanded federal involvement in healthcare markets; the TCJA reduced tax burdens based on the theory that private sector growth benefits everyone. Understanding this ideological divide is essential for analyzing domestic policy debates.


Sovereignty and Regional Realignment

These policies demonstrate how nations assert or redefine their relationships with international institutions and neighbors. The mechanism involves weighing the benefits of integration against the desire for independent decision-making.

Brexit

  • 2016 referendum chose EU departure—52% voted to leave, reflecting concerns about sovereignty, immigration, and EU regulations
  • Trade and immigration policy changes required years of negotiation, illustrating how deeply integrated the UK had become with EU systems
  • Northern Ireland Protocol created ongoing tensions by maintaining an open border with Ireland while the UK left the EU customs union

China's Belt and Road Initiative

  • Infrastructure investment strategy aims to connect Asia, Africa, and Europe through ports, railways, and digital networks
  • Debt diplomacy concerns arise when recipient countries struggle to repay Chinese loans, potentially ceding strategic assets or political influence
  • Geopolitical competition with Western development models reflects China's ambition to reshape global economic architecture

Compare: Brexit vs. Belt and Road Initiative—Brexit represents a nation withdrawing from an integration project, while BRI represents a nation building new integration frameworks. Both reshape regional relationships, but in opposite directions.


Crisis Response and Emergency Powers

These policies show how governments expand their roles during emergencies. The principle is that crises often accelerate policy changes that might otherwise take years, but also raise questions about when emergency measures should end.

COVID-19 Pandemic Response Policies

  • Public health measures including lockdowns, mask mandates, and social distancing represented unprecedented peacetime restrictions on movement and commerce
  • Vaccine development and emergency authorization compressed a typically decade-long process into under a year through Operation Warp Speed and similar programs
  • Economic stimulus packages injected trillions into economies worldwide, expanding government debt while preventing economic collapse

EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)

  • Comprehensive data rights give individuals control over personal information, including rights to access, correction, and deletion
  • Explicit consent requirements force organizations to obtain clear permission before processing data, shifting the default from opt-out to opt-in
  • Extraterritorial enforcement means any company handling EU residents' data must comply, effectively setting global privacy standards

Compare: COVID-19 Response vs. GDPR—both expanded government regulatory power, but COVID policies were reactive emergency measures while GDPR was a proactive framework developed over years. Consider how crisis-driven versus deliberative policymaking produces different outcomes.


Quick Reference Table

ConceptBest Examples
Multilateral cooperationParis Agreement, Iran Nuclear Deal, USMCA
Economic nationalism/protectionismUS-China Trade War, Brexit, USMCA content requirements
Healthcare policy reformAffordable Care Act, COVID-19 vaccine distribution
Tax and fiscal policyTax Cuts and Jobs Act, COVID-19 stimulus packages
Sovereignty vs. integrationBrexit, Belt and Road Initiative
Crisis response mechanismsCOVID-19 policies, Iran Deal withdrawal
Regulatory expansionGDPR, ACA insurance mandates
Geopolitical competitionUS-China Trade War, Belt and Road Initiative

Self-Check Questions

  1. Which two policies demonstrate opposing approaches to international cooperation—one building multilateral frameworks and one withdrawing from them? What does each approach prioritize?

  2. Compare the Affordable Care Act and the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act: how do they reflect different theories about government's role in the economy?

  3. Both the US-China Trade War and USMCA addressed dissatisfaction with trade arrangements. What distinguishes a unilateral approach from a multilateral one, and what are the tradeoffs of each?

  4. If an essay asked you to analyze how crises accelerate policy change, which two policies from this guide would you compare, and what mechanisms would you highlight?

  5. The Belt and Road Initiative and Brexit both reshape regional relationships. How do they represent opposite directions of economic integration, and what concerns has each raised about sovereignty?