Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Native American conflicts aren't just a list of battles to memorize—they're the clearest window into how the United States government and settlers systematically dispossessed Indigenous peoples of their lands, sovereignty, and lives. You're being tested on the patterns behind these conflicts: federal Indian policy, Manifest Destiny, resistance and accommodation, and the expansion of federal power. Each war, massacre, and forced removal illustrates broader themes about American expansion and the human costs of westward movement.
These conflicts span from the colonial period through Reconstruction and into the Gilded Age, meaning they connect to nearly every unit in the course. Don't just memorize dates and death tolls—know what concept each conflict illustrates. Was it about colonial competition for empire? Jacksonian democracy and states' rights? The post-Civil War consolidation of federal power over western territories? Understanding the why behind each conflict will help you tackle both multiple-choice questions and FRQs with confidence.
Before American independence, conflicts between Native peoples and colonists were shaped by European imperial rivalries and the struggle for control of North American resources. Native nations often played European powers against each other, but colonial expansion steadily eroded Indigenous autonomy.
Compare: King Philip's War vs. Pontiac's Rebellion—both were Native coalitions resisting colonial encroachment, but King Philip's War destroyed Native power in New England while Pontiac's Rebellion temporarily forced British policy changes. If an FRQ asks about Native resistance strategies, note how coalition-building evolved over time.
The 1830s marked a shift from localized conflicts to systematic federal policy aimed at removing all Native peoples east of the Mississippi. These events connect directly to debates over federal power, states' rights, and the meaning of Jacksonian democracy.
Compare: Trail of Tears vs. Seminole Wars—both resulted from the Indian Removal Act, but Cherokee removal succeeded through military force while Seminole guerrilla resistance made complete removal impossible. This contrast shows the range of Native responses to federal policy.
After 1865, the federal government turned its attention—and its newly expanded military—toward consolidating control over western territories. Conflicts in this era reflect the collision between reservation policy, railroad expansion, and Native peoples' final armed resistance.
Compare: Sand Creek Massacre vs. Wounded Knee Massacre—both involved U.S. forces killing peaceful or surrendering Native people, including women and children. Sand Creek occurred during the Civil War era amid frontier chaos; Wounded Knee marked the deliberate end of the "Indian Wars." Both illustrate the brutality underlying federal Indian policy.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Colonial-era imperial competition | French and Indian War, King Philip's War |
| Pan-Indian resistance coalitions | Pontiac's Rebellion, Battle of Little Bighorn |
| Jacksonian federal Indian policy | Indian Removal Act, Trail of Tears |
| Native legal resistance strategies | Cherokee court cases, Treaty negotiations |
| Guerrilla warfare and prolonged resistance | Seminole Wars, Lakota campaigns |
| U.S. military massacres of non-combatants | Sand Creek Massacre, Wounded Knee Massacre |
| Westward expansion and land dispossession | Black Hawk War, post-Little Bighorn campaigns |
| End of Native armed resistance | Wounded Knee Massacre (1890) |
Which two conflicts both resulted from the Indian Removal Act but demonstrated very different Native responses to federal policy?
How did the outcome of the French and Indian War change the strategic position of Native nations in North America?
Compare the federal government's response to Sand Creek Massacre with its response to Native victory at Little Bighorn. What does this contrast reveal about U.S. Indian policy?
An FRQ asks you to explain how Andrew Jackson's presidency expanded federal power. Which conflict from this list provides the strongest evidence, and why might it seem contradictory given Jackson's states' rights rhetoric?
Identify two conflicts—one colonial, one post-Civil War—that both involved pan-Indian coalitions. What factors made coalition-building possible in each case, and why did both ultimately fail to stop American expansion?