upgrade
upgrade

🇺🇸AP US History

Significant Native American Conflicts

Study smarter with Fiveable

Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.

Get Started

Why This Matters

Native American conflicts aren't just a list of battles to memorize—they're the clearest window into how the United States government and settlers systematically dispossessed Indigenous peoples of their lands, sovereignty, and lives. You're being tested on the patterns behind these conflicts: federal Indian policy, Manifest Destiny, resistance and accommodation, and the expansion of federal power. Each war, massacre, and forced removal illustrates broader themes about American expansion and the human costs of westward movement.

These conflicts span from the colonial period through Reconstruction and into the Gilded Age, meaning they connect to nearly every unit in the course. Don't just memorize dates and death tolls—know what concept each conflict illustrates. Was it about colonial competition for empire? Jacksonian democracy and states' rights? The post-Civil War consolidation of federal power over western territories? Understanding the why behind each conflict will help you tackle both multiple-choice questions and FRQs with confidence.


Colonial-Era Conflicts: Competition for Empire

Before American independence, conflicts between Native peoples and colonists were shaped by European imperial rivalries and the struggle for control of North American resources. Native nations often played European powers against each other, but colonial expansion steadily eroded Indigenous autonomy.

King Philip's War

  • Deadliest colonial conflict per capita—fought 1675–1676 between New England colonists and a coalition led by Metacom (King Philip) of the Wampanoag
  • Devastating losses for Native peoples eliminated organized Indigenous resistance in southern New England and opened land for colonial settlement
  • Turning point in colonial-Native relations, demonstrating that coexistence was giving way to conquest as the dominant colonial approach

French and Indian War

  • Part of the global Seven Years' War (1754–1763)—British and French forces, with their respective Native allies, fought for control of North American territory
  • British victory ended French colonial presence in mainland North America but created massive war debts that strained relations with colonists
  • Native autonomy declined as tribes lost the ability to play European powers against each other, setting the stage for post-war dispossession

Pontiac's Rebellion

  • Pan-Indian resistance movement (1763)—Chief Pontiac of the Ottawa united multiple tribes against British forts and settlements after the French defeat
  • Proclamation of 1763 resulted from the uprising, attempting to restrict colonial expansion west of the Appalachians
  • Colonial defiance of the Proclamation foreshadowed later tensions between settlers' land hunger and imperial/federal attempts to regulate expansion

Compare: King Philip's War vs. Pontiac's Rebellion—both were Native coalitions resisting colonial encroachment, but King Philip's War destroyed Native power in New England while Pontiac's Rebellion temporarily forced British policy changes. If an FRQ asks about Native resistance strategies, note how coalition-building evolved over time.


Jacksonian Era: Federal Power and Forced Removal

The 1830s marked a shift from localized conflicts to systematic federal policy aimed at removing all Native peoples east of the Mississippi. These events connect directly to debates over federal power, states' rights, and the meaning of Jacksonian democracy.

Indian Removal Act

  • Landmark legislation (1830) signed by Andrew Jackson authorizing the president to negotiate removal treaties with southeastern tribes
  • States' rights dimension—Jackson supported Georgia's efforts to extend state law over Cherokee lands, defying the Supreme Court's ruling in Worcester v. Georgia
  • Foundation for forced relocations that dispossessed the "Five Civilized Tribes" and established the legal framework for later western removals

Trail of Tears

  • Forced Cherokee removal (1838–1839)—approximately 16,000 Cherokee marched to Indian Territory (present-day Oklahoma) under military escort
  • 4,000+ deaths from disease, starvation, and exposure during the journey, making it a symbol of the human cost of removal policy
  • Cherokee resistance through legal channels (Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, Worcester v. Georgia) demonstrated Native nations' attempts to use American institutions—ultimately overridden by executive action

Seminole Wars

  • Three conflicts spanning 1817–1858—the longest and costliest Indian wars in U.S. history, fought over removal from Florida
  • Second Seminole War (1835–1842) featured guerrilla resistance that cost the U.S. millions of dollars and thousands of lives
  • Incomplete removal left a Seminole population in Florida, the only major tribe never fully removed from the Southeast

Black Hawk War

  • Brief conflict (1832) when Sauk leader Black Hawk led followers back to Illinois to reclaim ceded lands
  • Rapid U.S. victory resulted in the Treaty of Fort Armstrong, opening millions of acres in the upper Midwest to white settlement
  • Abraham Lincoln and Jefferson Davis both served in this war, connecting it to later Civil War leadership

Compare: Trail of Tears vs. Seminole Wars—both resulted from the Indian Removal Act, but Cherokee removal succeeded through military force while Seminole guerrilla resistance made complete removal impossible. This contrast shows the range of Native responses to federal policy.


Post-Civil War: Military Conquest of the West

After 1865, the federal government turned its attention—and its newly expanded military—toward consolidating control over western territories. Conflicts in this era reflect the collision between reservation policy, railroad expansion, and Native peoples' final armed resistance.

Sand Creek Massacre

  • Unprovoked attack (1864) by Colorado militia on a peaceful Cheyenne and Arapaho village flying an American flag and white surrender flag
  • 150–200 killed, mostly women, children, and elderly, with bodies mutilated by soldiers who displayed remains publicly
  • Congressional investigation condemned the massacre, but Colonel John Chivington faced no punishment—highlighting the gap between official policy and frontier violence

Battle of Little Bighorn

  • Decisive Native victory (June 1876)—Lakota, Northern Cheyenne, and Arapaho warriors annihilated Lieutenant Colonel George Custer's 7th Cavalry
  • Sitting Bull and Crazy Horse led the coalition that demonstrated Native military capability at its peak
  • Pyrrhic victory that intensified U.S. military campaigns, leading to the eventual defeat and reservation confinement of the Lakota

Wounded Knee Massacre

  • Final major conflict (December 1890)—U.S. troops killed approximately 250–300 Lakota men, women, and children during a disarmament operation
  • Ghost Dance movement had spread among reservation Natives, and U.S. officials feared it would spark an uprising
  • Symbolic end of armed Native resistance, marking the completion of U.S. military conquest of the continental West

Compare: Sand Creek Massacre vs. Wounded Knee Massacre—both involved U.S. forces killing peaceful or surrendering Native people, including women and children. Sand Creek occurred during the Civil War era amid frontier chaos; Wounded Knee marked the deliberate end of the "Indian Wars." Both illustrate the brutality underlying federal Indian policy.


Quick Reference Table

ConceptBest Examples
Colonial-era imperial competitionFrench and Indian War, King Philip's War
Pan-Indian resistance coalitionsPontiac's Rebellion, Battle of Little Bighorn
Jacksonian federal Indian policyIndian Removal Act, Trail of Tears
Native legal resistance strategiesCherokee court cases, Treaty negotiations
Guerrilla warfare and prolonged resistanceSeminole Wars, Lakota campaigns
U.S. military massacres of non-combatantsSand Creek Massacre, Wounded Knee Massacre
Westward expansion and land dispossessionBlack Hawk War, post-Little Bighorn campaigns
End of Native armed resistanceWounded Knee Massacre (1890)

Self-Check Questions

  1. Which two conflicts both resulted from the Indian Removal Act but demonstrated very different Native responses to federal policy?

  2. How did the outcome of the French and Indian War change the strategic position of Native nations in North America?

  3. Compare the federal government's response to Sand Creek Massacre with its response to Native victory at Little Bighorn. What does this contrast reveal about U.S. Indian policy?

  4. An FRQ asks you to explain how Andrew Jackson's presidency expanded federal power. Which conflict from this list provides the strongest evidence, and why might it seem contradictory given Jackson's states' rights rhetoric?

  5. Identify two conflicts—one colonial, one post-Civil War—that both involved pan-Indian coalitions. What factors made coalition-building possible in each case, and why did both ultimately fail to stop American expansion?