Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Migration is one of the most tested concepts in AP Human Geography, and understanding pull factors is essential for explaining why people move where they do. You're being tested on your ability to connect specific pull factors to broader geographic principles—things like economic development patterns, urbanization processes, chain migration, and the demographic transition. The College Board wants you to demonstrate that migration isn't random; it follows predictable patterns driven by perceived opportunities in destination regions.
Don't just memorize a list of reasons people move. Instead, focus on how pull factors interact with push factors, why certain regions become migration magnets, and what consequences mass migration has for both sending and receiving areas. When you see an FRQ about migration, you'll need to explain the mechanisms behind these pull factors and connect them to concepts like intervening opportunities, distance decay, and step migration. Know what geographic principle each pull factor illustrates, and you'll be ready for anything the exam throws at you.
Economic opportunity remains the most powerful driver of voluntary migration worldwide. When wage differentials exist between regions, people rationally calculate that relocating can improve their financial position—this is the foundation of Ravenstein's Laws of Migration and remains central to understanding global migration flows today.
Compare: Economic opportunities vs. urbanization—both involve jobs, but economic pull emphasizes wage differentials while urbanization emphasizes infrastructure and lifestyle. On FRQs about rural-to-urban migration, urbanization is your better example; for international migration, lead with wage differentials.
Migrants don't just seek higher incomes—they seek security and predictability. Stable governance reduces risk and increases the expected return on a migrant's investment in relocation, making political factors inseparable from economic calculations.
Compare: Political stability vs. religious freedom—both involve safety, but political stability addresses physical security while religious freedom addresses identity security. Refugees fleeing war exemplify the first; religious minorities seeking tolerance exemplify the second.
Education and healthcare represent investments in human capital—and migrants often relocate specifically to access institutions that will improve their long-term productivity and wellbeing. These pull factors disproportionately attract younger migrants and families, shaping the age structure of receiving populations.
Compare: Education vs. healthcare as pull factors—both build human capital, but education attracts younger migrants and families while healthcare access appeals across age groups. Note that both can trigger chain migration as initial migrants sponsor relatives.
Migration is rarely an individual decision—it occurs within social networks that reduce risk and provide support. Chain migration, where established migrants facilitate the movement of family and community members, explains why migration flows concentrate between specific origin-destination pairs.
Compare: Family reunification vs. quality of life—family reunification creates specific destination choices based on existing networks, while quality of life factors create general preferences for developed regions. FRQs about migration patterns between specific countries often hinge on chain migration.
Environmental conditions influence migration through both resource availability and livability. As climate change intensifies, environmental pull factors will increasingly interact with economic and safety considerations in shaping global migration flows.
Compare: Environmental pull factors vs. environmental push factors—the same phenomenon (climate) can push people away from degraded areas and pull them toward favorable ones. On questions about environmental migration, be prepared to discuss both directions.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Economic pull | Wage differentials, urban job markets, tech hubs |
| Governance/safety pull | Political stability, rule of law, religious freedom |
| Human capital pull | Elite universities, healthcare access, credential recognition |
| Social network pull | Family reunification, chain migration, diaspora communities |
| Environmental pull | Favorable climate, natural resources, environmental quality |
| Urbanization effects | Infrastructure, agglomeration, modern amenities |
| Intervening opportunities | Closer destinations with similar pull factors |
| Distance decay | Pull factor strength diminishes with distance from origin |
Which two pull factors most directly explain why migration often follows specific corridors between particular origin and destination countries, rather than dispersing randomly?
A family migrates from a rural area in a developing country to a major city in a developed country. Identify one economic pull factor and one human capital pull factor that might explain their decision—and explain how these factors interact.
Compare and contrast political stability and religious freedom as pull factors. What type of migrant would each factor most strongly attract?
How do urbanization and technological advancement function as pull factors differently for skilled versus unskilled migrants?
An FRQ asks you to explain how pull factors contribute to chain migration. Which pull factor is most directly responsible for chain migration, and how does it create self-reinforcing migration flows?