Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Florida's constitutional history isn't just a list of dates and documents—it's a roadmap of power, rights, and who gets to participate in democracy. When you study these amendments, you're tracing how Florida responded to national crises (the Civil War, Reconstruction, the Civil Rights Movement) and how the state balanced competing interests: federal vs. state authority, individual rights vs. government control, access vs. restriction. These constitutional shifts directly shaped who could vote, who could go to school, and how government operated for generations of Floridians.
You're being tested on your ability to connect specific amendments to broader historical movements and to explain cause and effect across different eras. Don't just memorize that Florida got a new constitution in 1868—know why Reconstruction required it and what it actually changed. The exam rewards students who can trace themes like voting rights or education access across multiple constitutional moments. Understanding the "why" behind each amendment will help you tackle any comparative or analytical question thrown your way.
Florida's earliest constitutions established the basic machinery of government. These documents created the legislative, executive, and judicial structures that would be modified—but never fully abandoned—in every subsequent revision.
Compare: 1838 vs. 1968—both created foundational government structures, but 1838 built from scratch for a territory while 1968 reorganized an existing state for modern governance. If an FRQ asks about constitutional modernization, 1968 is your go-to example.
The three constitutions between 1865 and 1885 represent Florida's turbulent response to emancipation and federal Reconstruction policy. Each document reflected shifting power dynamics between federal oversight, white Southern Democrats, and newly freed African Americans.
Compare: 1868 vs. 1885—both were responses to Reconstruction, but they moved in opposite directions. The 1868 Constitution expanded rights during federal oversight; the 1885 Constitution systematically removed them once white Democrats regained control. This reversal illustrates how constitutional rights can be granted and then stripped away.
Constitutional amendments don't just address rights—they also reorganize how government functions. Florida's cabinet system underwent significant changes to improve efficiency and accountability.
Compare: 1968 vs. 1998—both modernized Florida government, but 1968 restructured the entire constitutional framework while 1998 targeted specifically the executive branch's cabinet system. Both reflect ongoing efforts to make state government more functional.
Florida has used constitutional amendments to mandate educational standards and access. These amendments reflect the belief that education policy is important enough to enshrine in the state's foundational document rather than leave to legislative discretion.
Compare: Class Size vs. Universal Pre-K (both 2002)—these sister amendments show Floridians using the constitutional process to prioritize education funding. Both mandate state spending and reflect voter willingness to bypass the legislature on education policy. Strong examples for questions about direct democracy and constitutional mandates.
Perhaps no constitutional theme is more consistently tested than who gets to vote. Florida's amendments trace a dramatic arc from expansion to restriction and back again.
Compare: 1885 vs. 2018—both addressed voting eligibility, but in opposite directions. The 1885 Constitution used poll taxes and literacy tests to disenfranchise Black voters; the 2018 amendment expanded the franchise to formerly incarcerated people. This comparison illustrates Florida's long struggle over who belongs in the electorate.
Constitutional amendments sometimes address social and cultural questions, embedding specific values into the state's foundational document.
Compare: 2008 Marriage Amendment vs. 2018 Felons' Voting Rights—both were citizen-initiated amendments addressing civil rights questions, but they moved in opposite directions. The 2008 amendment restricted rights while 2018 expanded them. Both show how Florida's initiative process allows voters to directly shape constitutional policy.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Foundational governance | 1838 Constitution, 1968 Constitution |
| Reconstruction & civil rights expansion | 1868 Constitution |
| Voter disenfranchisement | 1885 Constitution (poll taxes, literacy tests) |
| Voter rights restoration | 2018 Amendment 4 |
| Education mandates | 2002 Class Size, 2002 Universal Pre-K |
| Executive branch reform | 1998 Cabinet Reform |
| Social/cultural policy | 2008 Marriage Amendment |
| Post-Civil War compliance | 1865 Constitution |
Which two constitutions represent the most dramatic reversal in voting rights for African Americans, and what specific mechanisms did each use?
How do the 2002 education amendments (Class Size and Universal Pre-K) demonstrate the use of constitutional amendments to mandate state spending?
Compare the 1865 and 1868 Constitutions: What did each accomplish regarding civil rights, and why were two constitutions needed within three years?
If an FRQ asked you to trace the theme of "who gets to vote" across Florida's constitutional history, which four amendments would you discuss and in what order?
Why did the 1968 Constitution replace the 1885 Constitution, and what does this tell you about how constitutions can become outdated even without being morally problematic?