Significant Education Court Cases

Why This Matters

Education law cases aren't just history—they're the legal architecture that defines who gets access to education, what students can say and believe, and how schools must treat diverse populations. You're being tested on how the courts have interpreted equal protection, free speech, religious freedom, and federalism in educational settings. These cases show up repeatedly on exams because they illustrate the tension between competing constitutional values: state authority versus individual rights, majority rule versus minority protection, and religious liberty versus church-state separation.

Don't just memorize case names and dates. Know what constitutional principle each case established and how later decisions built on or challenged earlier precedents. When you see an FRQ about student rights or educational equity, you need to connect specific cases to the broader legal doctrines they represent. The exam rewards students who can explain why a ruling matters, not just what it decided.

---

Equal Protection and Desegregation

The Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause became the primary tool for dismantling educational discrimination. These cases trace the arc from legally sanctioned segregation to court-ordered integration—and reveal the limits of judicial power to achieve educational equity.

Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)

• Established the "separate but equal" doctrine—legitimizing state-mandated racial segregation for nearly six decades
• Upheld Louisiana's segregation laws and created constitutional cover for Jim Crow policies across public facilities, including schools
• Set the legal precedent that the Fourteenth Amendment permitted racial separation as long as facilities were theoretically equal—a standard rarely enforced in practice

Brown v. Board of Education (1954)

• Declared racial segregation in public schools unconstitutional—unanimously overturning Plessy's "separate but equal" doctrine
• Emphasized psychological harm, ruling that segregation "generates a feeling of inferiority" that damages African American children's educational development
• Became the foundation for the civil rights movement's legal strategy and all subsequent school desegregation efforts

Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education (1971)

• Upheld busing as a desegregation tool—affirming broad judicial authority to remedy segregated school systems
• Gave federal courts enforcement power to oversee and mandate specific desegregation plans, including redrawing attendance zones
• Addressed implementation challenges of Brown, recognizing that ending de jure segregation required active remedies, not just passive nondiscrimination

---

Educational Access and Equity

Beyond racial segregation, courts have grappled with who deserves educational access and whether funding disparities violate constitutional guarantees. These cases define the boundaries of equal protection when applied to immigration status, language barriers, and economic inequality.

Plyler v. Doe (1982)

• Ruled that states cannot deny free public education to undocumented children—striking down a Texas law that withheld funding for their schooling
• Applied intermediate scrutiny under the Equal Protection Clause, finding that punishing children for their parents' immigration status was irrational
• Emphasized education's unique role in preparing individuals for civic participation—though stopped short of declaring education a fundamental right

Lau v. Nichols (1974)

• Required schools to provide language assistance to non-English speaking students—ruling that identical treatment isn't always equal treatment
• Interpreted Title VI of the Civil Rights Act to mandate affirmative steps for language access, not just the absence of discrimination
• Established the legal foundation for bilingual education programs and English Language Learner services nationwide

San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez (1973)

• Ruled that education is not a fundamental right under the U.S. Constitution—applying only rational basis review to funding disparities
• Upheld property tax-based school funding despite creating vast inequalities between wealthy and poor districts
• Shifted equity battles to state courts, where many state constitutions do guarantee educational rights—a critical distinction for exam questions

---

Student Free Speech Rights

The First Amendment doesn't stop at the schoolhouse gate—but it doesn't apply with full force either. Courts have carved out a middle ground that protects student expression while preserving schools' ability to maintain order and fulfill their educational mission.

Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969)

• Affirmed that students retain First Amendment rights in school—famously declaring they don't "shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse gate"
• Protected symbolic political speech (black armbands protesting Vietnam) that didn't substantially disrupt school operations
• Established the disruption standard: schools can only restrict student expression if it materially and substantially interferes with education—a test still applied today

---

Religion in Public Schools

The First Amendment's religion clauses—Free Exercise and Establishment—create competing pressures in education. Schools cannot promote religion, but they also cannot burden religious practice without compelling justification.

Engel v. Vitale (1962)

• Ruled that state-sponsored prayer in public schools violates the Establishment Clause—even when participation is technically voluntary
• Rejected the argument that nondenominational prayer was constitutionally acceptable; government cannot compose prayers for students
• Established the principle that public schools must remain neutral on religion, launching decades of litigation over religious expression in schools

Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972)

• Exempted Amish families from compulsory education laws past eighth grade based on Free Exercise rights
• Balanced competing interests, weighing the state's interest in educated citizens against parents' rights to direct religious upbringing
• Set precedent for religious exemptions in education—though later cases have narrowed Free Exercise protections in other contexts

Zelman v. Simmons-Harris (2002)

• Upheld school voucher programs that allow public funds to flow to religious schools through parental choice
• Applied the "true private choice" test—if parents, not government, direct funds to religious institutions, no Establishment Clause violation occurs
• Reshaped the school choice debate by removing a major constitutional barrier to voucher programs

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. Which two cases both addressed school desegregation but focused on different aspects—one on the constitutional principle and one on implementation remedies?

2. How do Plyler v. Doe and San Antonio v. Rodriguez reach different conclusions about educational access despite both involving the Equal Protection Clause?

3. Compare and contrast Engel v. Vitale and Zelman v. Simmons-Harris: What explains why government involvement with religion was unconstitutional in one case but permitted in the other?

4. If an FRQ asked you to explain the constitutional standard for restricting student speech in public schools, which case establishes the baseline rule, and what is that standard?

5. Wisconsin v. Yoder and Engel v. Vitale both involve religion in education but rely on different parts of the First Amendment. Which clause does each case interpret, and how do the outcomes reflect the tension between those clauses?