upgrade
upgrade

💃History of Dance

Significant Dance Schools

Study smarter with Fiveable

Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.

Get Started

Why This Matters

Dance schools aren't just training facilities—they're the laboratories where movement vocabularies are invented, codified, and transmitted across generations. When you study significant dance schools, you're really examining how pedagogical systems shape artistic movements, how national identities get expressed through codified techniques, and how institutional power determines which styles become canonical. These schools represent the intersection of tradition and innovation, technique and artistry, and preservation and experimentation.

You're being tested on your ability to connect specific institutions to broader developments in dance history. Don't just memorize founding dates—know what technique or methodology each school pioneered, how it reflected the cultural moment of its creation, and what lasting influence it had on professional dance. Understanding why the Vaganova method differs from Balanchine's approach matters far more than knowing when either school opened its doors.


Classical Ballet Academies: The European Foundations

These institutions established ballet as a codified art form with systematic training methods. Each developed a distinct national style while maintaining the classical vocabulary, creating the pedagogical frameworks that still define professional ballet training worldwide.

Paris Opera Ballet School

  • Oldest continuously operating ballet school in the world (1713)—established during Louis XIV's reign, institutionalizing court dance into formal pedagogy
  • French style emphasizes elegant port de bras, refined épaulement, and decorative precision over athletic virtuosity
  • Direct pipeline to Paris Opera Ballet means students learn repertoire and company style from the earliest stages of training

Vaganova Academy of Russian Ballet

  • Vaganova method combines French elegance with Italian virtuosity, creating the athletic yet expressive Russian style that dominated 20th-century ballet
  • Founded in 1738 in St. Petersburg, producing legends including Nijinsky, Pavlova, Nureyev, and Baryshnikov
  • Character dance training integrated alongside classical technique, reflecting Russian ballet's embrace of folk traditions and dramatic narrative

Royal Ballet School

  • Founded in 1926 by Ninette de Valois—part of the deliberate effort to establish a British national ballet tradition
  • English style blends French precision with Russian expressiveness, emphasizing clean lines and understated musicality
  • Dual-track curriculum combines professional dance training with academic studies, pioneering the conservatory model now standard worldwide

Compare: Paris Opera Ballet School vs. Vaganova Academy—both train elite classical dancers, but French style prioritizes decorative refinement while Russian training emphasizes athletic power and dramatic expression. If an FRQ asks about national ballet styles, these two schools represent the clearest contrast.


American Ballet: Breaking from European Tradition

American ballet schools emerged in the 20th century with a mission to create distinctly New World approaches to classical technique. These institutions challenged European dominance while still honoring classical foundations, producing the speed-driven, musical, and democratic aesthetic that defines American ballet.

School of American Ballet

  • Founded in 1934 by George Balanchine and Lincoln Kirstein—the institutional foundation for creating an American ballet identity
  • Balanchine technique emphasizes speed, off-balance movement, extreme extensions, and deep musicality rather than pantomime storytelling
  • Official school of New York City Ballet means curriculum directly reflects company repertoire and aesthetic values

Compare: School of American Ballet vs. Vaganova Academy—both produce world-class technicians, but SAB trains dancers for Balanchine's plotless, music-driven ballets while Vaganova prepares dancers for dramatic full-length narratives. This distinction reflects broader differences between American neoclassicism and Russian classical traditions.


Modern Dance Pioneers: Rejecting Ballet's Dominance

These schools emerged from choreographers who rejected ballet's codified vocabulary in favor of new movement systems. Each founder developed a technique based on their own body and artistic philosophy, institutionalizing personal innovation into teachable methodology.

Martha Graham School of Contemporary Dance

  • Founded in 1926, making it contemporary with the Royal Ballet School but representing a radical alternative to classical training
  • Graham technique centers on contraction and release—using the breath and solar plexus as the movement's origin rather than the vertical spine of ballet
  • Dance as emotional expression prioritizes psychological truth and narrative meaning over decorative beauty or technical virtuosity

Merce Cunningham Studio

  • Cunningham technique treats spine as a flexible, articulated structure, emphasizing isolated movement of body parts and chance-based choreography
  • Rejected Graham's expressionism—movement has no inherent meaning; dance exists independently from music and narrative
  • Collaboration across art forms with composers like John Cage and visual artists like Robert Rauschenberg modeled interdisciplinary practice now standard in contemporary dance

Compare: Martha Graham School vs. Merce Cunningham Studio—both rejected ballet, but Graham replaced classical vocabulary with psychologically expressive movement while Cunningham rejected expression itself, treating dance as pure movement. This split defines the two major branches of American modern dance.


Cultural Identity and Social Mission Schools

These institutions use dance training to advance cultural preservation and social change. Rather than claiming universal technique, they center specific cultural traditions and community values, challenging Eurocentric dominance in concert dance.

Alvin Ailey American Dance Theater School

  • Founded in 1969 to train dancers in the style of Ailey's company, which fuses modern, ballet, jazz, and African diasporic forms
  • Cultural mission explicitly centers African American experience and heritage, challenging the whiteness of mainstream concert dance
  • Diverse technique curriculum produces versatile dancers capable of moving across styles, reflecting Ailey's own eclectic choreographic vocabulary

Laban Centre for Movement and Dance

  • Laban Movement Analysis (LMA) provides vocabulary for describing any movement, not just codified dance technique—democratizing movement study
  • Founded in 1986 but based on Rudolf Laban's early 20th-century theories about effort, shape, and space
  • Holistic approach integrates performance training with movement analysis, dance therapy, and community practice

Compare: Alvin Ailey School vs. Juilliard Dance Division—both train versatile contemporary dancers, but Ailey centers African American cultural heritage while Juilliard emphasizes cross-disciplinary collaboration within Western concert dance traditions. Both reject single-technique training.


Conservatory Models: Comprehensive Arts Training

These institutions embed dance within broader performing arts education, emphasizing collaboration, versatility, and career preparation. The conservatory model treats dance as one discipline among many, producing artist-scholars rather than pure technicians.

Juilliard School Dance Division

  • Founded in 1951 within America's most prestigious performing arts conservatory, legitimizing dance as equal to music and drama
  • Curriculum balances ballet, modern, and choreography—rejecting single-technique training in favor of versatility
  • Cross-disciplinary collaboration with Juilliard musicians and actors models professional creative partnerships

ConceptBest Examples
National ballet stylesParis Opera (French), Vaganova (Russian), Royal Ballet (English)
American neoclassicismSchool of American Ballet
Modern dance techniquesMartha Graham School, Merce Cunningham Studio
Cultural identity missionsAlvin Ailey School, Laban Centre
Conservatory training modelJuilliard Dance Division
Codified technique systemsVaganova method, Graham technique, Cunningham technique, Balanchine style
Rejection of narrativeMerce Cunningham Studio, School of American Ballet
Interdisciplinary practiceJuilliard, Merce Cunningham Studio, Laban Centre

Self-Check Questions

  1. Which two schools represent the clearest contrast between French and Russian classical ballet styles, and what specific qualities distinguish each national approach?

  2. Both Martha Graham and Merce Cunningham rejected ballet—what fundamental principle did they disagree about regarding dance's relationship to meaning and expression?

  3. If an FRQ asked you to discuss how American ballet distinguished itself from European traditions, which school and choreographer would provide your strongest evidence, and why?

  4. Compare the Alvin Ailey School and the Laban Centre: what do they share in their approach to dance training, and how do their cultural missions differ?

  5. Which three schools developed codified techniques named after their founders, and how does each technique's core principle reflect its creator's artistic philosophy?