Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Dance schools aren't just training facilities—they're the laboratories where movement vocabularies are invented, codified, and transmitted across generations. When you study significant dance schools, you're really examining how pedagogical systems shape artistic movements, how national identities get expressed through codified techniques, and how institutional power determines which styles become canonical. These schools represent the intersection of tradition and innovation, technique and artistry, and preservation and experimentation.
You're being tested on your ability to connect specific institutions to broader developments in dance history. Don't just memorize founding dates—know what technique or methodology each school pioneered, how it reflected the cultural moment of its creation, and what lasting influence it had on professional dance. Understanding why the Vaganova method differs from Balanchine's approach matters far more than knowing when either school opened its doors.
These institutions established ballet as a codified art form with systematic training methods. Each developed a distinct national style while maintaining the classical vocabulary, creating the pedagogical frameworks that still define professional ballet training worldwide.
Compare: Paris Opera Ballet School vs. Vaganova Academy—both train elite classical dancers, but French style prioritizes decorative refinement while Russian training emphasizes athletic power and dramatic expression. If an FRQ asks about national ballet styles, these two schools represent the clearest contrast.
American ballet schools emerged in the 20th century with a mission to create distinctly New World approaches to classical technique. These institutions challenged European dominance while still honoring classical foundations, producing the speed-driven, musical, and democratic aesthetic that defines American ballet.
Compare: School of American Ballet vs. Vaganova Academy—both produce world-class technicians, but SAB trains dancers for Balanchine's plotless, music-driven ballets while Vaganova prepares dancers for dramatic full-length narratives. This distinction reflects broader differences between American neoclassicism and Russian classical traditions.
These schools emerged from choreographers who rejected ballet's codified vocabulary in favor of new movement systems. Each founder developed a technique based on their own body and artistic philosophy, institutionalizing personal innovation into teachable methodology.
Compare: Martha Graham School vs. Merce Cunningham Studio—both rejected ballet, but Graham replaced classical vocabulary with psychologically expressive movement while Cunningham rejected expression itself, treating dance as pure movement. This split defines the two major branches of American modern dance.
These institutions use dance training to advance cultural preservation and social change. Rather than claiming universal technique, they center specific cultural traditions and community values, challenging Eurocentric dominance in concert dance.
Compare: Alvin Ailey School vs. Juilliard Dance Division—both train versatile contemporary dancers, but Ailey centers African American cultural heritage while Juilliard emphasizes cross-disciplinary collaboration within Western concert dance traditions. Both reject single-technique training.
These institutions embed dance within broader performing arts education, emphasizing collaboration, versatility, and career preparation. The conservatory model treats dance as one discipline among many, producing artist-scholars rather than pure technicians.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| National ballet styles | Paris Opera (French), Vaganova (Russian), Royal Ballet (English) |
| American neoclassicism | School of American Ballet |
| Modern dance techniques | Martha Graham School, Merce Cunningham Studio |
| Cultural identity missions | Alvin Ailey School, Laban Centre |
| Conservatory training model | Juilliard Dance Division |
| Codified technique systems | Vaganova method, Graham technique, Cunningham technique, Balanchine style |
| Rejection of narrative | Merce Cunningham Studio, School of American Ballet |
| Interdisciplinary practice | Juilliard, Merce Cunningham Studio, Laban Centre |
Which two schools represent the clearest contrast between French and Russian classical ballet styles, and what specific qualities distinguish each national approach?
Both Martha Graham and Merce Cunningham rejected ballet—what fundamental principle did they disagree about regarding dance's relationship to meaning and expression?
If an FRQ asked you to discuss how American ballet distinguished itself from European traditions, which school and choreographer would provide your strongest evidence, and why?
Compare the Alvin Ailey School and the Laban Centre: what do they share in their approach to dance training, and how do their cultural missions differ?
Which three schools developed codified techniques named after their founders, and how does each technique's core principle reflect its creator's artistic philosophy?