Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
When you study dance history, you're not just memorizing company names and founding dates—you're tracing how artistic movements emerge, challenge conventions, and reshape cultural expression. These companies represent pivotal moments when choreographers broke from tradition, fused cultural influences, or codified entirely new movement vocabularies. Understanding why each company matters helps you connect individual works to broader themes like modernism's rejection of classical form, the democratization of dance, and cross-cultural exchange.
On exams, you'll be tested on how companies reflect their historical moment and influence subsequent generations. A question about Martha Graham isn't really about Graham—it's about contraction and release as a rejection of ballet's verticality. A question about Ballets Russes is really asking about collaborative modernism and the birth of dance as total theater. Don't just memorize facts—know what artistic revolution each company represents and how they connect to one another.
These companies rejected classical ballet's rigid vocabulary and created new movement languages rooted in emotional authenticity, breath, and the body's relationship to gravity. They represent dance's modernist revolution.
Compare: Martha Graham vs. Merce Cunningham—both rejected classical ballet, but Graham centered emotional narrative and psychological drama while Cunningham stripped dance of meaning entirely, treating movement as pure form. If an FRQ asks about modernism's range, these two represent opposite poles of the same revolution.
These companies preserved and codified the classical tradition while also evolving it. They represent institutional continuity, technical rigor, and the ballet canon that modern dance defined itself against.
Compare: Bolshoi Ballet vs. Royal Ballet—both maintain classical repertoire, but Bolshoi emphasizes theatrical grandeur and athletic virtuosity while Royal Ballet cultivates musicality and emotional subtlety. This distinction illustrates how national cultures shape ballet aesthetics even within shared technique.
The United States developed two major ballet institutions with contrasting missions—one preserving tradition, one reinventing it. Together they define American classical dance.
Compare: ABT vs. NYCB—both are premier American companies, but ABT functions as a repertory company preserving diverse traditions while NYCB was built around one choreographer's revolutionary vision. This distinction matters for understanding how institutions shape artistic identity.
These companies transformed dance by breaking down barriers between art forms, treating ballet as total theater that integrated visual art, music, and movement in unprecedented ways.
Compare: Ballets Russes vs. Nederlands Dans Theater—both prioritized collaboration and innovation over repertoire preservation, but Ballets Russes operated in early modernism's explosion of new art forms while NDT emerged in postwar Europe's experimental climate. Both show how breaking from institutions enables artistic revolution.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Modern dance pioneers | Martha Graham, Alvin Ailey, Merce Cunningham |
| Classical ballet institutions | Paris Opera Ballet, Bolshoi Ballet, Royal Ballet |
| American ballet development | ABT, New York City Ballet |
| Collaborative/interdisciplinary approach | Ballets Russes, Merce Cunningham, Nederlands Dans Theater |
| Cultural representation in dance | Alvin Ailey American Dance Theater |
| Neoclassical innovation | New York City Ballet (Balanchine) |
| Avant-garde experimentation | Merce Cunningham, Nederlands Dans Theater |
| Oldest companies (institutional continuity) | Paris Opera Ballet (1669), Bolshoi (1776) |
Compare and contrast Martha Graham Dance Company and Merce Cunningham Dance Company. Both rejected classical ballet—what did each propose instead, and how do their philosophies represent different strands of modernism?
Which two companies best illustrate the difference between preserving repertoire versus building around a single choreographic vision? Explain what makes their missions distinct.
If an FRQ asked you to discuss how dance companies have addressed cultural representation and identity, which company would be your strongest example and why?
The Ballets Russes never performed in Russia, yet it's considered essential to Russian ballet history. What does this reveal about how artistic movements spread and gain international influence?
Identify two companies founded in different centuries that both emphasize collaboration across artistic disciplines. What historical conditions enabled each company's collaborative approach?