Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
In algebraic topology, continuous functions are the primary tools you use to probe the structure of topological spaces. You're not just being tested on definitionsโexams will ask you to recognize when two spaces are essentially the same, how subspaces relate to their parent spaces, and what it means for functions to be deformable into one another. These functions form the backbone of every major theorem you'll encounter, from classification results to the fundamental group.
The key insight is that topology cares about properties preserved under continuous deformation. Each function type in this guide captures a different way spaces can relate: some preserve everything (homeomorphisms), some collapse structure (retractions, quotient maps), and some reveal hidden symmetry (covering maps). Don't just memorize the notationโknow what each function does to a space and what topological property it tests or preserves.
These functions maintain or reveal the essential topological structure of spaces. They're your go-to examples when proving two spaces share the same properties.
Compare: Identity function vs. Inclusion mapโboth "do nothing" to points, but identity has the same domain and codomain while inclusion relates a subspace to a larger space. On FRQs, inclusion maps often appear when you need to show a subspace inherits properties from the ambient space.
These functions reduce complexity by ignoring certain distinctionsโeither by projecting away dimensions or by gluing points together.
Compare: Projection map vs. Quotient mapโboth reduce dimensionality or complexity, but projections forget coordinates while quotient maps glue points together. If an FRQ asks you to construct a space by identification, you need quotient maps.
These functions capture when spaces or maps are "the same up to continuous wiggling"โthe heart of algebraic topology's flexible perspective.
Compare: Retraction vs. Deformation retractionโboth collapse onto , but deformation retractions do so continuously through time while keeping fixed throughout. Deformation retracts give homotopy equivalence; ordinary retracts don't necessarily.
Covering maps reveal the local-to-global structure of spaces and are essential for computing fundamental groups.
Compare: Quotient map vs. Covering mapโboth are surjective, but quotient maps glue points together (losing information) while covering maps "unfold" a space (revealing hidden structure). The circle covers itself via , but the quotient of by is the circle.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Structure preservation | Identity function, Homeomorphism, Inclusion map |
| Dimension reduction | Projection map, Constant function |
| Space construction | Quotient map |
| Homotopy equivalence | Homotopy, Deformation retraction |
| Subspace relationships | Inclusion map, Retraction, Deformation retraction |
| Local-global structure | Covering map |
| Always continuous | Identity, Constant function, Inclusion, Projection |
| Requires continuous inverse | Homeomorphism |
Which two functions both "fix" a subspace pointwise, and what additional property distinguishes a deformation retraction from an ordinary retraction?
A space is contractible if what relationship exists between its identity function and a constant function? What does this imply about ?
Compare and contrast quotient maps and covering maps: both are surjective, but how do they differ in what they reveal or conceal about the domain space?
If you're asked to show two spaces have isomorphic fundamental groups, which function type gives the strongest resultโand why might you prefer a deformation retraction over a general homotopy equivalence?
The projection is always continuous. What property of the product topology guarantees this, and how would you verify it using the definition of continuity?