upgrade
upgrade

๐Ÿ”ขElementary Algebraic Topology

Significant Continuous Functions

Study smarter with Fiveable

Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.

Get Started

Why This Matters

In algebraic topology, continuous functions are the primary tools you use to probe the structure of topological spaces. You're not just being tested on definitionsโ€”exams will ask you to recognize when two spaces are essentially the same, how subspaces relate to their parent spaces, and what it means for functions to be deformable into one another. These functions form the backbone of every major theorem you'll encounter, from classification results to the fundamental group.

The key insight is that topology cares about properties preserved under continuous deformation. Each function type in this guide captures a different way spaces can relate: some preserve everything (homeomorphisms), some collapse structure (retractions, quotient maps), and some reveal hidden symmetry (covering maps). Don't just memorize the notationโ€”know what each function does to a space and what topological property it tests or preserves.


Structure-Preserving Maps

These functions maintain or reveal the essential topological structure of spaces. They're your go-to examples when proving two spaces share the same properties.

Identity Function

  • Maps every point to itselfโ€”the "do nothing" function that serves as the baseline for all other continuous maps
  • Notation: idX:Xโ†’Xid_X: X \to X where idX(x)=xid_X(x) = x for all xโˆˆXx \in X
  • Role in proofs: appears in composition identities and as the reference point for defining retractions and homotopy equivalences

Homeomorphism

  • Bijective continuous function with continuous inverseโ€”the gold standard for "topologically identical" spaces
  • Notation: f:Xโ†’Yf: X \to Y is a homeomorphism if ff and fโˆ’1f^{-1} are both continuous
  • Classification power: if Xโ‰…YX \cong Y, every topological invariant (compactness, connectedness, fundamental group) agrees

Inclusion Map

  • Embeds a subspace into its parent spaceโ€”formally i:Aโ†ชXi: A \hookrightarrow X where i(a)=ai(a) = a
  • Preserves subspace topology: the open sets in AA are precisely intersections of open sets in XX with AA
  • Pairs with retractions: if rโˆ˜i=idAr \circ i = id_A, then AA is a retract of XX

Compare: Identity function vs. Inclusion mapโ€”both "do nothing" to points, but identity has the same domain and codomain while inclusion relates a subspace to a larger space. On FRQs, inclusion maps often appear when you need to show a subspace inherits properties from the ambient space.


Collapsing and Simplifying Maps

These functions reduce complexity by ignoring certain distinctionsโ€”either by projecting away dimensions or by gluing points together.

Projection Map

  • Extracts one factor from a product spaceโ€”ฯ€1:Xร—Yโ†’X\pi_1: X \times Y \to X sends (x,y)โ†ฆx(x, y) \mapsto x
  • Always continuous in the product topology (this is essentially why we define the product topology as we do)
  • Universal property: characterizes product spacesโ€”any map into Xร—YX \times Y factors through projections

Constant Function

  • Sends every point to a single fixed pointโ€”f:Xโ†’Yf: X \to Y with f(x)=y0f(x) = y_0 for all xโˆˆXx \in X
  • Always continuous regardless of the topologies on XX and YY
  • Homotopy baseline: a space is contractible if its identity map is homotopic to a constant map

Quotient Map

  • Identifies points via an equivalence relationโ€”q:Xโ†’X/โˆผq: X \to X/{\sim} is surjective with the quotient topology
  • Characterizing property: UโІX/โˆผU \subseteq X/{\sim} is open if and only if qโˆ’1(U)q^{-1}(U) is open in XX
  • Construction tool: builds tori, projective spaces, and Klein bottles by gluing edges of simpler spaces

Compare: Projection map vs. Quotient mapโ€”both reduce dimensionality or complexity, but projections forget coordinates while quotient maps glue points together. If an FRQ asks you to construct a space by identification, you need quotient maps.


Deformation and Equivalence

These functions capture when spaces or maps are "the same up to continuous wiggling"โ€”the heart of algebraic topology's flexible perspective.

Homotopy

  • Continuous deformation between two mapsโ€”H:Xร—[0,1]โ†’YH: X \times [0,1] \to Y with H(x,0)=f(x)H(x,0) = f(x) and H(x,1)=g(x)H(x,1) = g(x)
  • Notation: we write fโ‰ƒgf \simeq g when ff and gg are homotopic
  • Invariance principle: homotopic maps induce identical homomorphisms on fundamental groups and homology

Retraction

  • Projects a space onto a subspaceโ€”r:Xโ†’Ar: X \to A where AโІXA \subseteq X and rโˆ˜i=idAr \circ i = id_A
  • Restriction condition: r(a)=ar(a) = a for all aโˆˆAa \in A (the subspace stays fixed)
  • Obstruction results: if AA is a retract of XX, then ฯ€1(A)\pi_1(A) injects into ฯ€1(X)\pi_1(X)

Deformation Retraction

  • Retraction plus a homotopyโ€”H:Xร—[0,1]โ†’XH: X \times [0,1] \to X with H0=idXH_0 = id_X, H1=rH_1 = r, and HtโˆฃA=idAH_t|_A = id_A
  • Implies homotopy equivalence: Xโ‰ƒAX \simeq A when AA is a deformation retract of XX
  • Classic example: Rnโˆ–{0}\mathbb{R}^n \setminus \{0\} deformation retracts onto Snโˆ’1S^{n-1}

Compare: Retraction vs. Deformation retractionโ€”both collapse XX onto AA, but deformation retractions do so continuously through time while keeping AA fixed throughout. Deformation retracts give homotopy equivalence; ordinary retracts don't necessarily.


Covering and Lifting

Covering maps reveal the local-to-global structure of spaces and are essential for computing fundamental groups.

Covering Map

  • Locally trivial surjectionโ€”p:Eโ†’Bp: E \to B where each bโˆˆBb \in B has a neighborhood UU with pโˆ’1(U)โ‰…Uร—Fp^{-1}(U) \cong U \times F (discrete fiber)
  • Path lifting property: paths and homotopies in BB lift uniquely to EE once you fix a starting point
  • Fundamental group connection: for the universal cover, ฯ€1(B)โ‰…Deck(E/B)\pi_1(B) \cong \text{Deck}(E/B), the group of deck transformations

Compare: Quotient map vs. Covering mapโ€”both are surjective, but quotient maps glue points together (losing information) while covering maps "unfold" a space (revealing hidden structure). The circle covers itself via zโ†ฆznz \mapsto z^n, but the quotient of R\mathbb{R} by Z\mathbb{Z} is the circle.


Quick Reference Table

ConceptBest Examples
Structure preservationIdentity function, Homeomorphism, Inclusion map
Dimension reductionProjection map, Constant function
Space constructionQuotient map
Homotopy equivalenceHomotopy, Deformation retraction
Subspace relationshipsInclusion map, Retraction, Deformation retraction
Local-global structureCovering map
Always continuousIdentity, Constant function, Inclusion, Projection
Requires continuous inverseHomeomorphism

Self-Check Questions

  1. Which two functions both "fix" a subspace AA pointwise, and what additional property distinguishes a deformation retraction from an ordinary retraction?

  2. A space XX is contractible if what relationship exists between its identity function and a constant function? What does this imply about ฯ€1(X)\pi_1(X)?

  3. Compare and contrast quotient maps and covering maps: both are surjective, but how do they differ in what they reveal or conceal about the domain space?

  4. If you're asked to show two spaces have isomorphic fundamental groups, which function type gives the strongest resultโ€”and why might you prefer a deformation retraction over a general homotopy equivalence?

  5. The projection ฯ€1:Xร—Yโ†’X\pi_1: X \times Y \to X is always continuous. What property of the product topology guarantees this, and how would you verify it using the definition of continuity?