Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Every shot type in cinematography serves a specific storytelling function—and on the exam, you're being tested on your ability to identify why a filmmaker chose a particular framing, not just what you see on screen. Shot selection directly impacts audience psychology: how close we feel to characters, how much context we receive about their world, and where our attention gets directed. Understanding these choices connects to broader concepts like visual rhetoric, narrative structure, mise-en-scène, and audience positioning.
When you analyze a scene, think beyond labeling shots. Ask yourself: What emotional or informational work is this shot doing? How does it relate to the shots before and after it? The best exam responses demonstrate that you understand shot types as deliberate communication tools, not just technical categories. Don't just memorize names—know what each shot accomplishes and when a director would reach for it.
The distance between camera and subject directly manipulates how audiences connect with characters. Closer framing increases intimacy and emotional intensity; greater distance creates objectivity or isolation.
Compare: Close-Up vs. Medium Shot—both keep focus on the subject, but CU prioritizes internal emotion while MS reveals how characters physically inhabit space. If an FRQ asks about character dynamics in conversation, discuss how alternating between these creates rhythm.
These shots orient viewers within the story world. They answer fundamental questions: Where are we? What's the scale? How do characters relate to their environment?
Compare: Establishing Shot vs. Wide Shot—both show environment, but establishing shots specifically introduce a location (often at scene beginnings), while wide shots can appear anywhere to emphasize spatial relationships. Know the functional difference for analysis questions.
These framings reveal how characters connect to each other. They make subtext visible by showing physical and psychological positioning between people.
Compare: Two-Shot vs. Over-the-Shoulder—both show character relationships, but two-shots present characters as equals in frame while OTS privileges one character's perspective. Discuss this distinction when analyzing how films position audience sympathy.
These shots manipulate what audiences know and how they experience story information. They determine whether we observe characters or experience events through them.
Compare: POV vs. Insert—both focus attention on specific visual information, but POV is explicitly tied to a character's perception while inserts are narratively motivated close-ups that may not represent any character's viewpoint. This distinction matters when discussing subjective vs. objective camera work.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Emotional intimacy | Extreme Close-Up, Close-Up |
| Character-environment relationship | Wide Shot, Long Shot, Establishing Shot |
| Dialogue and interaction | Medium Shot, Over-the-Shoulder, Two-Shot |
| Subjective experience | Point-of-View Shot |
| Narrative emphasis on detail | Insert Shot, Extreme Close-Up |
| Scene transitions and orientation | Establishing Shot |
| Power dynamics between characters | Two-Shot, Over-the-Shoulder |
Which two shot types both emphasize detail but differ in whether they represent a character's perspective? Explain the distinction.
A director wants to show a character's isolation in a vast landscape. Which shot type would be most effective, and why might a close-up undermine this goal?
Compare the Over-the-Shoulder shot and the Two-Shot: how does each position the audience differently in relation to the characters?
If an FRQ asks you to analyze how a film builds suspense, which shot types would you discuss and what specific effects would you attribute to each?
A scene opens with a city skyline at dusk, then cuts to two people arguing in an apartment. Identify the shot types used and explain the narrative function of this sequence.