upgrade
upgrade

☪️Religions of the West

Sects of Islam

Study smarter with Fiveable

Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.

Get Started

Why This Matters

When you study the sects of Islam, you're not just memorizing a list of groups—you're uncovering how religious authority, succession disputes, and theological interpretation shape entire civilizations. The divisions within Islam illuminate core questions that appear across all Western religions: Who has the right to lead? How should sacred texts be interpreted? What role does mystical experience play alongside formal doctrine? These questions drove the Sunni-Shia split just as they drove the Protestant Reformation centuries later.

Understanding Islamic sects also prepares you to analyze religion's relationship to political power, a theme you'll encounter repeatedly on exams. Whether it's the alliance between Wahhabism and the Saudi state or the Alawite minority ruling Syria, these case studies demonstrate how religious identity intersects with governance, nationalism, and social hierarchy. Don't just memorize which sect believes what—know why these divisions emerged and what broader religious dynamics each sect illustrates.


Succession and Authority: The Original Split

The fundamental division in Islam centers on a single question: Who rightfully succeeded the Prophet Muhammad? This dispute over legitimate religious authority created the two largest branches of the faith and continues to shape geopolitics today.

Sunni Islam

  • Largest Islamic sect (85-90% of Muslims)—accepts the first four caliphs as legitimate successors chosen by community consensus
  • The Sunnah (traditions and practices of the Prophet) holds authority alongside the Quran, forming the basis of Islamic law
  • Four major legal schools—Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i, and Hanbali—demonstrate how Sunni Islam allows for diverse interpretations within shared foundational beliefs

Shia Islam

  • Ali ibn Abi Talib (Muhammad's cousin and son-in-law) was the rightful first caliph according to Shia belief—succession should follow the Prophet's bloodline
  • Imams serve as infallible spiritual guides—this concept of divinely guided leadership distinguishes Shia from Sunni authority structures
  • Twelver Shia is the largest branch, dominant in Iran, Iraq, and Lebanon, believing in twelve successive Imams with the twelfth in occultation awaiting return

Compare: Sunni vs. Shia—both revere the Quran and the Prophet, but differ fundamentally on how religious authority is transmitted. Sunnis emphasize community consensus; Shias emphasize bloodline and divinely appointed Imams. If an FRQ asks about religious schism, this is your clearest parallel to the Catholic-Protestant split over papal authority.


Mystical and Esoteric Traditions

Some Islamic movements prioritize inner spiritual experience over outward legal observance. These traditions often developed within existing sects, offering pathways to direct encounter with the divine.

Sufism

  • Mystical dimension of Islam seeking direct, personal experience of God through spiritual disciplines—not a separate sect but a practice found across Sunni and Shia communities
  • Tariqas (brotherhoods) organize around a sheikh who guides disciples through stages of spiritual purification toward divine union
  • Poetry, music, and dance (including the whirling of Mevlevi dervishes) serve as devotional practices—emphasizes love and tolerance as paths to God

Druze

  • Originated from Ismaili Shia Islam in 11th-century Egypt but developed into a distinct, closed religion with esoteric teachings
  • Reincarnation and divine unity are central beliefs—souls continuously reborn until achieving spiritual perfection
  • Religious knowledge is restricted to initiated members called uqqal; the Druze do not accept converts and maintain strict endogamy

Alawites

  • Syncretic tradition blending Shia Islam with Gnostic and pre-Islamic elements—views Ali as a divine manifestation rather than simply a rightful caliph
  • Esoteric knowledge transmitted through initiation distinguishes believers from outsiders—historically secretive due to persecution
  • Political significance in Syria where Alawites, though a minority, have held power since the Assad family's rise—demonstrates how marginalized sects can achieve political dominance

Compare: Sufism vs. Druze—both emphasize esoteric spiritual knowledge, but Sufism operates within mainstream Islam as a mystical practice, while Druze developed into a separate closed religion that no longer identifies as Muslim. This distinction matters for understanding how mystical movements can either reform from within or break away entirely.


Reform and Revivalist Movements

Throughout Islamic history, movements have emerged calling for return to original sources or purification of practice. These reform impulses parallel similar dynamics in Christianity and Judaism.

Wahhabism

  • 18th-century reform movement founded by Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab in Arabia—advocates strict monotheism and rejection of bid'ah (religious innovation)
  • Alliance with the Saudi state gave Wahhabism political power and global reach through oil wealth and religious institutions
  • Criticized for intolerance toward Sufism, Shia Islam, and practices like shrine veneration—represents the tension between reform and pluralism within religious traditions

Ahmadiyya

  • Founded in 1889 by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, who claimed to be the Promised Messiah and Mahdi—challenges the mainstream belief in Muhammad as the final prophet
  • Continuation of revelation distinguishes Ahmadiyya theology—most Muslim groups reject this claim and consider Ahmadis non-Muslim
  • Emphasizes peace and service—despite (or because of) persecution, the movement promotes non-violence and humanitarian work globally

Compare: Wahhabism vs. Ahmadiyya—both are modern reform movements, but they move in opposite directions. Wahhabism seeks to restrict Islam to its earliest sources and practices; Ahmadiyya seeks to expand the prophetic tradition. Both face controversy: Wahhabism for exclusivism, Ahmadiyya for heterodoxy.


Alternative Models of Governance and Community

Some sects developed distinct approaches to political authority and community organization, often in response to the centralized caliphate model.

Ibadi Islam

  • Predates the Sunni-Shia split—emerged from early debates about leadership and represents a third, often overlooked branch of Islam
  • Pragmatic governance emphasizes community consensus and rejects both hereditary rule and violent rebellion—leaders can be deposed for moral failure
  • Dominant in Oman where Ibadi traditions have shaped a reputation for moderation and religious tolerance in the region

Kharijites

  • Earliest schismatic movement emerging from the first Islamic civil war (656-661 CE)—rejected both Sunni and Shia claims to authority
  • Radical egalitarianism held that any pious Muslim could lead, regardless of lineage—moral purity, not bloodline, determined legitimacy
  • Legacy of rebellion—though nearly extinct as a distinct sect, Kharijite ideas about takfir (declaring Muslims to be unbelievers) influence some modern extremist ideologies

Compare: Ibadi vs. Kharijite—both rejected the mainstream caliphate, but Ibadis developed a moderate, consensus-based approach while Kharijites embraced violent purism. This shows how similar origins can produce radically different outcomes—a useful point for essays on religious extremism versus moderation.


Islam in New Contexts

When Islam encounters new cultural settings, it sometimes produces movements that blend Islamic elements with local traditions and concerns.

Nation of Islam

  • African American religious movement founded in 1930s Detroit—combines Islamic terminology with Black nationalist theology and social activism
  • Unique theological claims include belief that Wallace Fard Muhammad was Allah in human form and Elijah Muhammad was his prophet—rejected by mainstream Islam
  • Focus on racial justice and economic empowerment—demonstrates how religious movements can serve as vehicles for social and political liberation among marginalized communities

Compare: Nation of Islam vs. Ahmadiyya—both are modern movements considered heterodox by mainstream Muslims, but for different reasons. Ahmadiyya challenges prophetic finality; Nation of Islam challenges core theological concepts about God's nature. Both illustrate how new movements navigate acceptance and rejection.


Quick Reference Table

ConceptBest Examples
Succession/Authority DisputeSunni, Shia
Mystical/Esoteric TraditionsSufism, Druze, Alawites
Modern Reform MovementsWahhabism, Ahmadiyya
Alternative Governance ModelsIbadi, Kharijites
Syncretic/Contextual MovementsNation of Islam, Druze, Alawites
Religion-State AllianceWahhabism (Saudi Arabia), Alawites (Syria)
Persecuted/Marginalized GroupsAhmadiyya, Alawites (historically), Druze
Emphasis on Bloodline AuthorityShia, Alawites

Self-Check Questions

  1. Compare and contrast Sunni and Shia Islam's views on religious authority. What fundamental question divides them, and how does each tradition answer it?

  2. Which two sects emerged as alternatives to both Sunni and Shia models of governance, and how do their approaches to leadership differ from each other?

  3. If an exam question asks you to identify Islamic movements that emphasize esoteric or mystical knowledge, which three groups would be your strongest examples, and what distinguishes each?

  4. Both Wahhabism and Ahmadiyya are considered reform movements. What does each seek to reform, and why does mainstream Islam accept one as legitimate while rejecting the other?

  5. How do the Druze and Nation of Islam illustrate the boundaries of Islamic identity? What specific beliefs place each movement outside mainstream Muslim acceptance?