Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Quadratic functions are the backbone of Algebra 2, and you're being tested on far more than just plugging numbers into formulas. The real exam challenge is knowing when to use each form and why one approach works better than another. Whether you're graphing a parabola, finding roots, or analyzing transformations, the form you choose determines how quickly and accurately you can solve the problem.
Think of these formulas as different lenses for viewing the same function—each one reveals specific information instantly. Standard form shows you the y-intercept, vertex form hands you the vertex coordinates, and factored form displays the roots right in the equation. Master the connections between these forms, and you'll handle any quadratic problem with confidence. Don't just memorize the formulas—know what each one tells you and when it's your best tool.
Every quadratic function can be written in three equivalent forms. Each form is optimized to reveal different features of the parabola, so choosing the right form saves time and reduces errors.
Compare: Standard Form vs. Vertex Form—both describe the same parabola, but standard form gives you the y-intercept instantly while vertex form gives you the vertex. On graphing problems, convert to vertex form first; on y-intercept questions, stay in standard form.
When factoring fails or isn't obvious, these formulas guarantee you can find the roots of any quadratic equation. The discriminant tells you what kind of roots to expect before you even solve.
Compare: Factored Form vs. Quadratic Formula—factored form shows roots directly but only works when you can factor; the quadratic formula always works but requires more calculation. If an FRQ asks you to "find all roots," try factoring first, then fall back to the quadratic formula.
These formulas help you find the turning point of any parabola directly from standard form coefficients. The axis of symmetry always passes through the vertex, dividing the parabola into mirror images.
Compare: Vertex Form vs. Vertex Formula—vertex form gives you the vertex by inspection , while the vertex formula calculates it from standard form coefficients. Know both: use the formula when given standard form, recognize the vertex instantly when given vertex form.
These elegant relationships connect the coefficients of a quadratic directly to its roots—no solving required. Vieta's formulas let you analyze roots using only , , and .
Compare: Quadratic Formula vs. Vieta's Formulas—the quadratic formula finds the actual root values, while Vieta's formulas give you the sum and product without solving. Use Vieta's when a problem asks about root relationships or when constructing a quadratic from given roots.
| Concept | Key Formulas |
|---|---|
| Standard Form | |
| Vertex Form | |
| Factored Form | |
| Finding Roots | Quadratic Formula: |
| Root Type Analysis | Discriminant: |
| Vertex Location | , then find by substitution |
| Axis of Symmetry | |
| Root Relationships | Sum: , Product: (Vieta's) |
You're given a quadratic in standard form and asked to graph it quickly. Which two formulas would you use first to locate the vertex?
A quadratic has a discriminant of . What does this tell you about the roots, and which form of the function would be impossible to write using only real numbers?
Compare and contrast: How do vertex form and the vertex formula each help you find the vertex? When would you use one over the other?
If you know a quadratic has roots at and , how would you use Vieta's formulas to find and (assuming )?
An FRQ gives you and asks for the minimum value. Which formula gives you the x-coordinate of the minimum, and how do you find the actual minimum value?